Proto-Circassian language

Proto-Circassian (or Proto-Adyghe–Kabardian) is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Adyghean and Kabardian languages.

Proto-Circassian
Proto-Adyghe–Kabardian
Reconstruction ofCircassian languages
Reconstructed
ancestor
Lower-order reconstructions

Phonology

edit


ProtoCircassian
Proto-East Circassian
ProtoWest Circassian
Kuban river
Black Sea coast
A Circassian dialects family tree.

Note on Orthography: This article employs Cyrillic characters alongside IPA to assist readers familiar with the Circassian alphabet. However, standard Adyghe orthography contains inconsistencies; notably, the digraph кӏ represents the sound [t͡ʃʼ] despite visually suggesting a velar ejective [kʼ]. To ensure phonetic precision, this article utilizes the following distinctions: чӏ for [t͡ʃʼ], чӏъ for [ʈʂʼ], and кӏь for [kʲʼ].

Orthographic Convention
This article uses specific Cyrillic notation to resolve ambiguities in the standard alphabet:
чӏ [t͡ʃʼ] (Standard кӏ)
чӏъ [ʈʂʼ] (Retroflex)
кӏь [kʲʼ] (Palatalized velar)

Consonants

edit

The consonant system is reconstructed with a four-way phonation contrast in stops and affricates, and a two-way contrast in fricatives.

Shifts

edit

The following table shows how Proto-Circassian consonants diverged and evolved in the Western and Eastern dialects.[1][2][3][4]

Proto-
Circassian
Western Circassian (Adyghe) Eastern Circassian (Kabardian)
Shapsug Bzhedug Chemguy Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
b б b б b б
p п p п b б
пʰ пʰ p п p п
пӏ пӏ пӏ
d д d д d д
t т t т d д
тʰ тʰ t т t т
тӏ тӏ тӏ
ɡʲ гь ɡʲ гь d͡ʒ дж ɡʲ гь d͡ʒ дж
(ɡʲ гь in some dialects)
кь кь t͡ʃ ч ɡʲ гь d͡ʒ дж
(ɡʲ гь in some dialects)
kʲʰ кʰь kʲʰ кʰь t͡ʃʰ чʰ t͡ʃ ч кь t͡ʃ ч
( кь in some dialects)
kʲʼ кӏь kʲʼ кӏь t͡ʃʼ чӏ kʲʼ кӏь t͡ʃʼ чӏ
(kʲʼ кӏь in some dialects)
ɡʷ гу ɡʷ гу ɡʷ гу
ку ку ɡʷ гу
kʷʰ кʰу kʷʰ кʰу ку ку
kʷʼ кӏу kʷʼ кӏу kʷʼ кӏу
q къ q къ q къ
кʰъ кʰъ q къ q͡χ кхъ
къу къу къу
qʷʰ кʰъу qʷʰ кʰъу къу q͡χʷ кхъу
Proto-
Circassian
Western Circassian Eastern Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedug Chemguy Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
d͡z дз d͡z дз d͡z дз
t͡s ц t͡s ц d͡z дз
t͡sʰ цʰ t͡sʰ цʰ t͡s ц t͡s ц
t͡sʼ цӏ t͡sʼ / цӏ / сӏ t͡sʼ цӏ t͡sʼ цӏ
d͡ʐʷ джъу d͡ʐʷ джъу v в
t͡ʂʷ чъу t͡ʂʷ чъу v в
t͡ɕʷʰ чъʰу t͡ʂʷʰ чъʰу t͡ʂʷ чъу f ф
d͡ʒ дж d͡ʒ дж ʒ ж d͡ʒ дж ʒ ж
t͡ʃ ч t͡ʃ ч ʃ ш d͡ʒ дж ʒ ж
t͡ʂ чъ t͡ʃ ч t͡ʂ чъ ʂ шъ d͡ʐ джъ ʒ ж
t͡ʃʰ чʰ   ʃʰ шʰ ʃ ш t͡ʃ ч ʃ ш
t͡ʂʰ чʰъ ʃʰ шʰ ʃ ш t͡ʂ чъ ʃ ш
t͡ʃʼ чӏ t͡ʃʼ чӏ ɕʼ / ʔʲ щӏ / ӏ t͡ʃʼ чӏ ɕʼ щӏ
t͡ʂʼ чӏъ t͡ʃʼ чӏ t͡ʂʼ чӏъ ɕʼ / ʔʲ щӏ / ӏ t͡ʂʼ чӏъ ɕʼ щӏ
Proto-
Circassian
Western Circassian Eastern Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedug Chemguy Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
z з z з z з
s с s с s с
ʑ жь ʒ ж ʑ жь ʑ жь
ɕ щ ʃ ш ɕ щ ɕ щ
ɕʼ шӏ ʃʼ шӏ ɕʼ щӏ
ʐʷ жъу ʑʷ жьу ʐʷ жъу v в
ʂʷ шъу ɕʷ щу ʂʷ шъу f ф
ʂʷʼ шӏу ʂʷʼ шӏу фӏ
ʒ ж ʒ ж ʒ ж ʑ жь
ʐ жъ ʐ жъ ʐ жъ ʑ жь
ʃ ш ʃ ш ʃ ш ɕ щ
ʂ шъ ʂ шъ ʂ шъ ɕ щ
ʃʰ шʰ ʃʰ шʰ ʃ ш ʃ ш ɕ щ
ʂʰ шʰъ ʃʰ шʰ ʃ ш ʂ шъ ɕ щ
Proto-
Circassian
Western Circassian Eastern Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedug Chemguy Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
ɮ л ɮ л ɮ л
ɬ лъ ɬ лъ ɬ лъ
ɬʼ лӏ ɬʼ лӏ ɬʼ лӏ
ɣ г ɣ г ɣ г
x х x х x х
ху f ф ху
ʁ гъ ʁ гъ ʁ гъ
ʁʷ гъу ʁʷ гъу ʁʷ гъу
χ хъ χ хъ χ хъ
χʷ хъу χʷ хъу χʷ хъу
ħ хь ħ хь ħ хь
m м m м m м
n н n н n н
r р r р r р
w у w у w у
j й j й j й
ʔ ӏ ʔ ӏ ʔ ӏ
ʔʷ ӏу ʔʷ ӏу ʔʷ ӏу

Specific Shifts

edit

Aspirated, plain and tense consonants

edit

In Proto-Circassian each voiceless obstruent could appear in up to three manners: an aspirated (lax) variant, a plain variant, and a tense (geminate) variant.

The aspirated series survived in the Shapsug and Bzhedug dialects, while it became plain in the other dialects (Abzakh, Chemgui, Kabardian).[5]

The tense series survived in the western dialects (Shapsug, Hatuqay, Bzhedug), merged into plain voiceless consonants in Chemgui (Temirgoy), and became voiced in the eastern dialects (Besleney and Kabardian). In linguistics literature the tense consonants are often written with a colon (e.g. ) to denote gemination/tenseness, and in some Cyrillic orthographies with double letters (e.g. пп, тт, цц) or a colon (e.g. п:, т:, ц:).[5]

In the tables below, dialects are grouped under West Circassian (Shapsug, Bzhedugh & Hatuqay, Chemgui, Abzakh) and East Circassian (Besleney where attested, and Kabardian). Bzhedugh and Hatuqay share a single column. The subsections group each consonant's aspirated and tense reflexes together.

Bilabial p
edit

Aspirated: пʰp п[5]

Tense: п: / ппb б[5]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: p
noiseпʰэ [pʰa]пʰэ [pʰa]пʰэ [pʰa]пэ [pa]пэ [pa]пэ [pa]
sharpпʰапсӏэ [pʰaːpsʼa]пʰапсӏэ [pʰaːpsʼa]пʰапцӏэ [paːpt͡sʼa]папцӏэ [paːpt͡sʼa]папцӏэ [paːpt͡sʼa]папцӏэ [paːpt͡sʼa]
arrogantпʰагэ [pʰaːɣa]пʰагэ [pʰaːɣa]пʰагэ [pʰaːɣa]пагэ [paːɣa]пагэ [paːɣa]пагэ [paːɣa]
noseпʰэ [pʰa]пʰэ [pʰa]пʰэ [pʰa]пэ [pa]пэ [pa]пэ [pa]
hedgehogпʰыжьэ [pʰəźa]пʰыжьэ [pʰəźa]пʰыжьэ [pʰəźa]пыжьэ [pəźa]пыжьэ [pəźa]пэжь [paź]
pleasureгӏуапʰэ [ɡʷapʰa]гӏуапʰэ [ɡʷapʰa]гӏуапэ [ɡʷapa]гӏуапэ [ɡʷapa]гӏуапэ [ɡʷapa]гӏуапэ [ɡʷapa]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: b
thorn (bush)п:анэ [pːaːna]п:анэ [pːaːna]п:анэ [pːaːna]панэ [paːna]панэ [paːna]банэ [baːna]
strong, solidп:ытэ [pːətă]п:ытэ [pːətă]п:ытэ [pːətă]пытэ [pətă]пытэ [pətă]быдэ [bədă]
steamп:ахэ [pːaxă]п:ахэ [pːaxă]п:ахэ [pːaxă]пахэ [paxă]пахэ [paxă]бахэ [baxă]
Dental t
edit

Aspirated: тʰt т[6]

Tense: т: / ттd д[6]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: t
respectпхъатʰэ [pχaːtʰa]пхъатʰэ [pχaːtʰa]пхъатʰэ [pχaːtʰa]пхъатэ [pχaːta]пхъатэ [pχaːta]
to giveетʰын [jatʰən]етʰын [jatʰən]етʰын [jatʰən]етын [jatən]етын [jatən]етын [jatən]
to takeштʰэн [ʃtʰan]штʰэн [ʃtʰan]штʰэн [ʃtʰan]штэн [ʃtan]штэн [ʃtan]щтэн [ɕtan]
onтʰет [tʰajt]тʰет [tʰajt]тʰет [tʰajt]тет [tajt]тет [tajt]тет [tat]
smoothцӏашъутʰэ [t͡sʼaːʂʷtʰa]цӏашъутʰэ [t͡sʼaːʂʷtʰa]цӏашъутʰэ [t͡sʼaːʂʷtʰa]цӏашъутэ [t͡sʼaːʃʷta]цӏашъутэ [t͡sʼaːʃʷta]цӏафтэ [t͡sʼaːfta]
to be afraidщтʰэн [ɕtʰan]щтʰэн [ɕtʰan]щтʰэн [ɕtʰan]щтэн [ɕtan]щтэн [ɕtan]щтэн [ɕtan]
pillowшъхьантʰэ [ʂħaːntʰa]шъхьантʰэ [ʂħaːntʰa]шъхьатʰэ [ʂħaːtʰa]шъхьантэ [ʂħaːnta]шъхьантэ [ʂħaːnta]щхьантэ [ɕħaːnta]
basketматʰэ [maːtʰa]матʰэ [maːtʰa]матʰэ [maːtʰa]матэ [maːta]матэ [maːta]матэ [maːta]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: d
weт:э [tːa]т:э [tːa]т:э [tːa]тэ [ta]тэ [ta]дэ [da]
leaderтхьэмат:э [tħamaːtːa]тхьэмат:э [tħamaːtːa]тхьэмат:э [tħamaːtːa]тхьэматэ [tħamaːta]тхьэматэ [tħamaːta]тхьэмадэ [tħamaːda]
sunт:ыгъэ [tːəɣa]т:ыгъэ [tːəɣa]т:ыгъэ [tːəɣa]тыгъэ [təɣa]тыгъэ [təɣa]дыгъэ [dəɣa]
wingт:амэ [tːaːma]т:амэ [tːaːma]т:амэ [tːaːma]тамэ [taːma]тамэ [taːma]дамэ [daːma]
Front affricate t͡s
edit

Aspirated: t͡sʰ цʰt͡s ц[7]

Tense: t͡sː ц: / ццd͡z дз[7]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: t͡sʰt͡s
woolцʰы [t͡sʰə]цʰы [t͡sʰə]цʰы [t͡sʰə]цʰы [t͡sʰə]цы [t͡sə]цы [t͡sə]
eyelashнэбзыцʰ [nabzət͡sʰ]нэбзыцʰ [nabzət͡sʰ]нэбзыцʰ [nabzət͡sʰ]нэбзыц [nabzət͡s]нэбзыц [nabzət͡s]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian East Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
Shift: t͡sːd͡z
fishпц:эжъые [pt͡sːaʐəja]пц:эжъые [pt͡sːaʐəja]пц:эжъые [pt͡sːaʐəja]пцэжъые [pt͡saʐəja]пцэжъые [pt͡saʐəja]бдзэжъей [bd͡zaʐej]бдзэжьей [bd͡zaʑej]
mouseц:ыгъо [t͡sːəʁʷa]ц:ыгъо [t͡sːəʁʷa]ц:ыгъо [t͡sːəʁʷa]цыгъо [t͡səʁʷa]цыгъо [t͡səʁʷa]дзыгъуэ [d͡zəʁʷa]дзыгъуэ [d͡zəʁʷa]
Middle affricate t͡ɕʷ (labialized)
edit

Aspirated: t͡ɕʷʰ чʰуt͡ɕʷ чу[8]

Tense: t͡ɕːʷ цу: / цуцуv в[8]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: t͡ɕʷʰt͡ʃʷ
jungleчъʰуны [t͡ɕʷʰənə]чъʰуны [t͡ɕʷʰənə]чъʰуны [t͡ɕʷʰənə]цуны [t͡ʃʷənə]цуны [t͡ʃʷənə]фын [fən]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
haystackхьанжъо [ħanʒʷa]хьанжъо [ħanʒʷa]хьанжъ [ħanʒʷ]хьанжъо [ħanʒʷa]хьанжъо [ħanʒʷa]хьэвэ [ħavə]
Palatal affricate kʲ → t͡ʃ
edit

Aspirated: kʲʰ кʰьt͡ʃ ч[9]

Tense: kːʲ кь: / кькьɡʲ гь / d͡ʒ дж[9]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: kʲʰt͡ʃ / t͡ʃʰ
spleenкьʰэ [kʲʰa]кьʰэ [kʲʰa]чʰэ [t͡ʃʰa]чэ [t͡ʃa]чэ [t͡ʃa]чэ [t͡ʃa]
brushwoodкьʰы [kʲʰə]кьʰы [kʲʰə]чʰы [t͡ʃʰə]чы [t͡ʃə]чы [t͡ʃə]чы [t͡ʃə]
to coughпскьʰэн [pskʲʰan]пскьʰэн [pskʲʰan]псчʰэн [pst͡ʃʰan]псчэн [pst͡ʃan]псчэн [pst͡ʃan]псчэн [pst͡ʃan]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian East Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
Shift: kːʲɡʲ / d͡ʒ
glassапкь: [aːpkːʲ]апкь: [aːpkːʲ]апч: [aːpt͡ʃː]апч [aːpt͡ʃ]апч [aːpt͡ʃ]абгь [ʔaːbɡʲ]абдж [ʔaːbd͡ʒ]
chickenкь:эт [kːʲat]кь:эт [kːʲat]ч:эты [t͡ʃːatə]чэты [t͡ʃatə]чэты [t͡ʃatə]гьэд [ɡʲad]джэд [d͡ʒad]
Labialized velar kʷ
edit

Aspirated: kʷʰ кʰу ку[10]

Tense: kːʷ ку: / кукуɡʷ гу[10]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: kʷʰ
thighкʰо [kʷʰa]кʰо [kʷʰa]кʰо [kʷʰa]ко [kʷa]ко [kʷa]куэ [kʷa]
middleкʰу [kʷʰə]кʰу [kʷʰə]кʰу [kʷʰə]ку [kʷə]ку [kʷə]ку [kʷə]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian East Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
Shift: kːʷɡʷ
shortкӏьак:о [kʲʼaːkːʷa]кӏьак:о [kʲʼaːkːʷa]кӏак:о [t͡ʃʼaːkːʷa]кӏако [t͡ʃʼaːkʷa]кӏако [t͡ʃʼaːkʷa]кӏьагуэ [kʲʼaːɡʷa]кӏагуэ [t͡ʃʼaːɡʷa]
wheatк:оц [kːʷat͡s]к:оцы [kːʷat͡sə]к:оцы [kːʷat͡sə]коцы [kʷat͡sə]коцы [kʷat͡sə]гуэдз [ɡʷad͡z]гуэдз [ɡʷad͡z]
Uvular q
edit

Aspirated: кʰъq къ (Kabardian q͡χ)[11]

Tense: къ: / къкъq къ (Adyghe); кӏъ (Kabardian)[11]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: q / q͡χ
graveкʰъэ [qʰa]кʰъэ [qʰa]кʰъэ [qʰa]къэ [qa]къэ [qa]кхъэ [q͡χa]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: q /
cleanкъ:абзэ [qːaːbza]къ:абзэ [qːaːbza]къабзэ [qaːbza]къабзэ [qaːbza]къабзэ [qaːbza]къабзэ [qʼaːbza]
Labialized uvular qʷ
edit

Aspirated: qʷʰ кʰъу къу (Kabardian q͡χʷ)[12]

Tense: qːʷ къу: / къукъу къу (Adyghe); qʼʷ кӏъу (Kabardian)[12]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: qʷʰ / q͡χʷ
pigкʰъо [qʰʷa]кʰъо [qʰʷa]кʰъо [qʰʷa]къо [qʷa]къо [qʷa]кхъуэ [q͡χʷa]
cheeseкʰъуае [qʰʷaːja]кʰъуае [qʰʷaːja]кʰъуае [qʰʷaːja]къуае [qʷaːja]къуае [qʷaːja]кхъуей [q͡χʷaj]
shipкʰъохь [qʰʷaħ]кʰъохь [qʰʷaħ]кʰъохь [qʰʷaħ]къухьэ [qʷəħa]къухьэ [qʷəħa]кхъухь [q͡χʷəħ]
to fartкъэкʰъун [qaqʰʷəʃʷən]къэкʰъун [qaqʰʷəʃʷən]къэкʰъун [qaqʰʷəʃʷən]къэкъушъун [qaqʷəʃʷən]къэкъушъун [qaqʷəʃʷən]къэцыфын [qat͡səfən]
peerкʰъужъы [qʰʷəʐə]кʰъужъы [qʰʷəʐə]кʰъужъы [qʰʷəʐə]къужъы [qʷəʐə]къужъы [qʷəʐə]кхъужьы [q͡χʷəʑə]
pearкъожьы [qʰʷəźə]къожьы [qʰʷəźə]къожьы [qʰʷəźə]къожьы [qʷəźə]къожьы [qʷəźə]къожь [qʷəź]
Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: qːʷ / qʼʷ
sonкъ:о [qːʷa]къ:о [qːʷa]къо [qʷa]къо [qʷa]къо [qʷa]къо [qʷa]
mountainкъ:ушъхьэ [qːʷəʃħa]къ:ушъхьэ [qːʷəʃħa]къушъхьэ [qʷəʃħa]къушъхьэ [qʷəʃħa]къушъхьэ [qʷəʃħa]къушхьэ [qʷəʃħa]
Postalveolar fricative ʃ
edit

Aspirated: ʃʰ шʰʃ ш / ɕ щ[13]

Retroflex variant: ʂʰ шʰъʂ шъ[13]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
Shift: ʃʰʃ / ɕ
brotherчʰы [t͡ʃʰə]шʰы [ʃʰə]шʰы [ʃʰə]шы [ʃə]шы [ʃə]къуэш [qʷaʃ]
lameлъашʰэ [ɬaːʃʰa]лъашʰэ [ɬaːʃʰa]лъашʰэ [ɬaːʃʰa]лъащэ [ɬaːɕa]лъащэ [ɬaːɕa]лъашэ [ɬaːʃa]
milkшʰэ [ʃʰa]шʰэ [ʃʰa]шʰэ [ʃʰa]щэ [ɕa]щэ [ɕa]шэ [ʃa]
saltшʰыгъу [ʃʰəʁʷ]шʰыгъу [ʃʰəʁʷ]шʰыгъу [ʃʰəʁʷ]щыгъу [ɕəʁʷ]щыгъу [ɕəʁʷ]шыгъу [ʃəʁʷ]
cloudпшʰэ [pʃʰa]пшʰэ [pʃʰa]пшʰэ [pʃʰa]пщэ [pɕa]пщэ [pɕa]пшэ [pʃa]
pusшʰыны [ʃʰənə]шʰыны [ʃʰənə]шʰыны [ʃʰənə]щыны [ɕənə]щыны [ɕənə]шын [ʃən]
accordionпщынэ [pɕəna]пшʰынэ [pʃʰəna]пщынэ [pɕəna]пщынэ [pɕəna]пщынэ [pɕəna]пщынэ [pɕəna]
fatпшʰэры [pʃʰarə]пшʰэры [pʃʰarə]пшʰэры [pʃʰarə]пщэры [pɕarə]пщэры [pɕarə]пшэр [pʃar]
waxщэфы [ɕafə]иэфы [ʃʰafə]щэфы [ɕafə]щэфы [ɕafə]щэфы [ɕafə]щэху [ɕaxʷə]
horseшʰы [ʃʰə]шʰы [ʃʰə]шʰы [ʃʰə]шы [ʃə]шы [ʃə]шы [ʃə]
sandпшʰахъо [pʃʰaːχʷa]пшʰахъо [pʃʰaːχʷa]пшʰахъо [pʃʰaːχʷa]пшахъо [pʃaːχʷa]пшахъо [pʃaːχʷa]пшахъуэ [pʃaːχʷa]
storyпшʰысэ [pʃʰəsa]пшʰысэ [pʃʰəsa]пшʰысэ [pʃʰəsa]пшысэ [pʃəsa]пшысэ [pʃəsa]пшысэ [pʃəsa]
Postalveolar fricative ʃ (additional lax–tense reflexes)
edit

The book records further lax and tense back-sibilant reflexes, including a glottalized member.[14]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian East Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
mountain top, surfaceшʰагъо [ʃʰaɣʷa]шʰагъо [ʃʰaɣʷa]шагъо [ʃaɣʷa]шагъо [ʃaɣʷa]шагъо [ʃaɣʷa]щагъуэ [ɕaɣʷa]
measure, sizeшʰапхъэ [ʃʰaːpχa]шʰапхъэ [ʃʰaːpχa]шапхъ [ʃaːpχ]шапхъ [ʃaːpχ]шапхъ [ʃaːpχ]щапхъэ [ɕaːpχa]
to collectшʰапӏэ [ʃʰapʰa]шʰапӏэ [ʃʰapʰa]щапӏэ [ɕapʼa]
internal fatшъэ [ʃa]шъэ [ʃa]шъэ [ʃa]шъэ [ʃa]шъэ [ʃa]щэ [ɕa]
to measure (space)шъы [ʃə]шъы [ʃə]шъы [ʃə]шъы [ʃə]шъы [ʃə]щы [ɕə]
hunter; to huntшъакӏо [ʃakʷʼa]шъакӏо [ʃakʷʼa]шъакӏо [ʃakʷʼa]шъакӏо [ʃakʷʼa]шъакӏо [ʃakʷʼa]щакӏуэ [ɕakʷʼa]
axeӏуашъэ [waːʃʼa]ӏуашъэ [waːʃʼa]ӏуашъэ [waʃʼa]ӏуашъэ [waʃʼa]ӏуашъэ [waʃʼa]ӏуэщ [waɕ]
to shear (sheep)шъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]щэ [ɕa]
threeшъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]шъэ [ʃʼa]щы [ɕə]
princessгуашъэ [ɡʷaːʃʼa]гуашъэ [ɡʷaːʃʼa]гуашъэ [ɡʷaːʃʼa]гуашъэ [ɡʷaːʃʼa]гуашъэ [ɡʷaːʃʼa]гуащэ [ɡʷaːɕa]
princeпшъэ [pʃʼa]пшъэ [pʃʼa]пшъэ [pʃʼa]пшъэ [pʃʼa]пшъэ [pʃʼa]пщэ [pɕa]
Back affricates t͡ʃ / t͡ʂ (tense)
edit

Tense palato-alveolar: t͡ʃː ч: / ччd͡ʒ дж / ʒ ж[15]

Tense retroflex: t͡ʂː чъ: / чъчъd͡ʐ джъ / ʒ ж[15]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian East Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
Shift: t͡ʃːd͡ʒ / ʒ
nightч:эщ [t͡ʃːaɕ]ч:эщы [t͡ʃːaɕə]ч:эщы [t͡ʃːaɕə]чэщы [t͡ʃaɕə]чэщы [t͡ʃaɕə]джэщ [d͡ʒaɕ]жэщ [ʒaɕ]
villageч:ылэ [t͡ʃːəɮa]ч:ылэ [t͡ʃːəɮa]ч:ылэ [t͡ʃːəɮa]чылэ [t͡ʃəɮa]чылэ [t͡ʃəɮa]джылэ [d͡ʒəɮa]жылэ [ʒəɮa]
cowч:эм [t͡ʃːam]ч:эмы [t͡ʃːamə]ч:эмы [t͡ʃːamə]чэмы [t͡ʃamə]чэмы [t͡ʃamə]джэм [d͡ʒam]жэм [ʒam]
Shift: t͡ʂːd͡ʐ / ʒ
treeчъ:ыг [t͡ʂːəɣ]чъ:ыгы [t͡ʂːəɣə]чъ:ыгы [t͡ʂːəɣə]чъыгы [t͡ʂəɣə]чъыгы [t͡ʂəɣə]джъыг [d͡ʐəɣ]жыг [ʒəɣ]
Back affricates t͡ʃ (lax and plain, full dialect reflexes)
edit

The lax (aspirated) and plain back affricates show distinct outcomes across all dialects, including Besleney.[16]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian East Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
Lax t͡ʃʰ
horseшʰы [ʃʰə]чʰы [t͡ʃʰə]шʰы [ʃʰə]шы [ʃə]шы [ʃə]чы [t͡ʃə]шы [ʃə]
rough, toughпхъашʰэ [pχaːʃʰa]пхъачʰэ [pχaːt͡ʃʰa]пхъашʰэ [pχaːʃʰa]пхъашэ [pχaːʃa]пхъашэ [pχaːʃa]пхъашэ [pχaːʃa]
Front affricate t͡s (additional lax–tense reflexes)
edit

The book records further front-affricate examples, including tense reflexes that surface as d͡z in Kabardian.[7]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian Kabardian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh
hair, woolцʰы [t͡sʰə]цʰы [t͡sʰə]цʰы [t͡sʰə]цы [t͡sə]цы [t͡sə]цы [t͡sə]
(wooden) spadeхьанцʰэ [ħant͡sʰa]хьанцʰэ [ħant͡sʰa]хьанцʰэ [ħant͡sʰa]хьанц [ħant͡s]хьанц [ħant͡s]хьанцэ [ħant͡sa]
toothцэ [t͡sa]цэ [t͡sa]цэ [t͡sa]цэ [t͡sa]цэ [t͡sa]дзэ [d͡za]
mouseцыгъэ [t͡səɣʷa]цыгъэ [t͡səɣʷa]цыгъэ [t͡səɣʷa]цыгъэ [t͡saɣʷa]цыгъэ [t͡saɣʷa]дзыгъуэ [d͡zəɣʷa]
Back spirant ʒ (voiced)
edit

Voiced back spirant: ʒ → Adyghe and Besleney ʒ : Kabardian ʑ жь.[17]

Word Proto-Circassian West Circassian East Circassian
Shapsug Bzhedugh & Hatuqay Chemgui Abzakh Besleney Kabardian
mouthжэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жьэ [ʑa]
sledgeжэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]жэ [ʒa]ӏажэ [ʔaːʒa]ӏажьэ [ʔaːʑa]
fleaбжэжэ [bʒaʒa]бжэжэ [bʒaʒa]бжэжэ [bʒaʒa]бжэжэ [bʒaʒa]бжэжэ [bʒaʒa]бжьэжьэ [bʑaʑa]
windжьы [ʒə]жьы [ʒə]жьы [ʒə]жьы [ʒə]жьы [ʒə]жьы [ʑə]
beeбжьы [bʒə]бжьы [bʒə]бжьы [bʒə]бжьы [bʒə]бжьы [bʒə]бжьы [bʒə]бжьы [bʑə]
weaselуэжьы [waʒə]уэжьы [waʒə]уэжьы [waʒə]уэжьы [waʒə]уэжьы [waʒə]уэжьы [waʒə]уэжьы [waʑə]

The Two Major Shifts

edit

The consonant system of the modern Circassian dialects looks the way it does because of two sound changes that swept through the language at different times. To understand them, it helps to start with the ancestor language, Proto-Circassian, and see what it had that the modern dialects have since reshaped.

Proto-Circassian had a rich set of stops and affricates. (An affricate is a single sound that begins like a stop and releases like a fricative — think of the "ch" in English church or the "j" in judge.) Crucially, Proto-Circassian distinguished three groups of sounds that would later become tangled together:

Postalveolar affricates (made with the tongue just behind the ridge behind the teeth):

Retroflex affricates (made with the tongue curled further back):

Palatalized velars (k- and g-type sounds pronounced with the tongue raised toward the hard palate, giving them a "soft", y-coloured quality):

The key thing to notice is that the palatalized velars (гь, кь, кӏь) were originally completely separate from the affricates (дж, ч, чӏ). They sounded different and behaved differently. The two sound changes described below are what eventually caused some dialects to merge these two groups, which is why the modern picture can look confusing at first.

The two phases are: Spirantization (Phase 1), in which old affricates turned into fricatives, and Velar Palatalization (Phase 2), in which the palatalized velars turned into affricates. They did not happen everywhere, and they did not happen in the same dialects — which is exactly why comparing dialects lets us reconstruct the original system.

Phase 1: Spirantization (Affricate → Fricative)
edit

Spirantization simply means "turning into a fricative" (a spirant is just another word for a fricative — a hissing sound like sh, or zh, where air flows continuously instead of being briefly stopped). In Phase 1, the original Proto-Circassian postalveolar and retroflex affricates lost their initial "stop" portion and became plain fricatives.[18][19][20]

In other words, a sound like d͡ʒ (the "j" in judge) simply dropped its stop beginning and was left as ʒ (the "s" in measure). The same thing happened to the whole series.

  • Affected Dialects: Abzakh, Modern Standard Kabardian, and archaic Kabardian dialects.
  • Unaffected Dialects: Shapsug, Bzhedug, Chemguy, and Besleney. (These dialects kept the original affricates intact, which is why they are so valuable for reconstructing the older system.)

The individual shifts were:

Notice that the plain affricates could end up as either ʃ/ʂ or ʒ depending on the dialect (compare Abzakh, which favours the voiceless ш/шъ, with Kabardian, which often voices these to ж). The ejective affricates (чӏ, чӏъ — the ones with a "popping", glottalic release marked by ӏ) both collapsed into the single ejective fricative ɕʼ щӏ.

There is also one dialect-specific quirk worth noting. In Abzakh, the ejective t͡ʃʼ чӏ frequently did not become a fricative at all, but instead weakened all the way to a palatalized glottal stop ʔʲ ӏь — essentially a catch in the throat rather than a hiss.

A few worked examples make the pattern concrete:

  • Proto-Circassian чӏэкӏьын "to come out from under" → щӏэкӏьын in Proto-Kabardian, but ӏекӏьын in Proto-Abzakh (showing the чӏ → ӏь weakening).
  • Proto-Circassian чӏэгъуэжьын "to regret" → щӏэгъуэжын in Kabardian, ӏегъуэжьын in Abzakh.
  • Proto-Circassian пачӏэ "mustache" → пащӏэ in both Kabardian and Abzakh.
  • Proto-Circassian чӏалэ "boy; young man" → щӏалэ in Kabardian, but ӏелэ in Abzakh.
  • Proto-Circassian чӏымахуэ "winter" → щӏымахуэ in Kabardian, щӏымафэ in Abzakh.
  • Proto-Circassian чӏэ "new" → щӏэ in both Kabardian and Abzakh.

There is one important catch that sets up Phase 2. In the dialects affected by Phase 1 only (some archaic Kabardian dialects) or by both phases (Standard Kabardian and Abzakh), the change applied to the original affricates but left the original palatalized velars untouched — for the time being. So at this stage, words built on the old velar кӏь were still pronounced with kʲʼ: кӏьапсэ "rope", кӏьэрахъуэ "gun", and кӏьэ "tail" all still had a genuine k-sound. They had not yet been pulled into the affricate series. That only happened later, in Phase 2.

The following table demonstrates the Phase 1 shift (affricate → fricative), grouped by individual sound change. It shows how Abzakh and Standard Kabardian innovated, while Bzhedug, Chemguy, and Besleney stayed conservative for these particular consonants.

Word Proto
Circassian
Bzhedug
Chemguy
(No Phase 1)
Besleney
(No Phase 1)
Abzakh
(Phase 1 affected)
Standard Kabardian
(Phase 1 affected)
Shift: d͡ʒ джʒ ж
foxбаджэ [baːd͡ʒa]баджэ [baːd͡ʒa]баджэ [baːd͡ʒa]бажэ [baːʒa]бажэ [baːʒa]
flourхьаджыгъэхьаджыгъэхьажыгъэхьэжыгъэхьэжыгъэ
villageкъуаджэ [qʷaːd͡ʒa]къуаджэ [qʷaːd͡ʒa]къуаджэ [qʷaːd͡ʒa]къуажэ [qʷaːʒa]къуажэ [qʷaːʒa]
Shift: t͡ʃ чʃ ш / ʒ ж
villageчылэ [t͡ʃəɮa]чылэ [t͡ʃəɮa]джылэ [d͡ʒəɮa]шылэ [ʃəɮa]жылэ [ʒəɮa]
nightчэщ [t͡ʃaɕ]чэщы [t͡ʃaɕə]джэщ [d͡ʒaɕ]шэщы [ʃaɕə]жэщ [ʒaɕ]
cowчэм [t͡ʃam]чэмы [t͡ʃamə]джэм [d͡ʒam]шэмы [ʃamə]жэм [ʒam]
Shift: t͡ʃʼ чӏɕʼ щӏ (Abzakh ш)
newчӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]шӏэ [ʃʼa]щӏэ [ɕʼa]
winterчӏымахо [t͡ʃʼəmaːxʷa]чӏымафэ [t͡ʃʼəmaːfa]чӏымахуэ [t͡ʃʼəmaːxʷa]шӏымафэ [ʃʼəmaːfa]щӏымахуэ [ɕʼəmaːxʷa]
young-manчӏалэ [t͡ʃʼaːɮa]чӏалэ [t͡ʃʼaːɮa]чӏалэ [t͡ʃʼaːɮa]ӏелэ [ʔʲaːɮa]щӏалэ [ɕʼaːɮa]
Shift: t͡ʂ чъʂ шъ / ʒ ж
to sleepчъыен [t͡ʂəjan]чъыен [t͡ʂəjan]джъеин [d͡ʐajən]шъыен [ʂəjan]жеин [ʒajən]
treeчъыг [t͡ʂəɣ]чъыгы [t͡ʂəɣə]джъыг [d͡ʐəɣ]шъыгы [ʂəɣə]жыг [ʒəɣ]
to runчъэн [t͡ʂan]чъэн [t͡ʂan]джъэн [d͡ʐan]шъэн [tʂan]жэн [ʒan]
Shift: t͡ʂʼ чӏъɕʼ щӏ (Abzakh шӏ)
areaчӏыпӏэ [t͡ʂʼəpʼa]чӏыпӏэ [t͡ʂʼəpʼa]чӏыпӏэ [t͡ʂʼəpʼa]шӏыпӏэ [ʃʼəpʼa]щӏыпӏэ [ɕʼəpʼa]
ironгъучӏы [ʁʷət͡ʂʼə]гъучӏы [ʁʷət͡ʂʼə]гъучӏы [ʁʷət͡ʂʼə]гъушӏы [ʃʼəpʼa]гъущӏы [ɕʼəpʼa]
Phase 2: Velar Palatalization
edit

Phase 2 came later, and in a sense it is the mirror image of Phase 1. Where Phase 1 turned affricates into fricatives, Phase 2 turned the leftover palatalized velars into affricates. The technical name is velar palatalization (or affrication of velars): the "soft" k- and g-sounds (гь, кь, кӏь) shifted their place of articulation forward and became palato-alveolar affricates — дж [d͡ʒ], ч [t͡ʃ], and чӏ [t͡ʃʼ] respectively.[21][22][23][24][25][26]

This is the change that finally merges the two groups in the dialects that underwent both phases. Once the old affricates had vacated their "slots" by becoming fricatives (Phase 1), the velars moved in and filled those slots by becoming the new affricates (Phase 2). The result is that a modern Standard Kabardian чӏ is not the original чӏ at all — the original one became щӏ in Phase 1 — but rather a brand-new чӏ created out of the old кӏь.

  • Affected Dialects: Abzakh, Bzhedug, Chemguy, and Modern Standard Kabardian.
  • Unaffected Dialects: Shapsug, Besleney, and archaic Kabardian dialects. (In these, the soft velars кь, гь, кӏь survive to this day.)

The individual shifts were[9][25][26]:

This is why words that were still pronounced with a velar at the end of Phase 1 are now pronounced as affricates in these dialects. The words чӏапсэ "rope", чӏэрахъуэ "gun", and чӏэ "tail" — which had genuine кӏь kʲʼ a moment ago — are now said with t͡ʃʼ.

Word Proto
Circassian
Shapsug
(No Phase 2)
Bzhedug
Chemguy
Abzakh
(Phase 2 affected)
Besleney
(No Phase 2)
Kabardian
(Phase 2 affected)
Shift: t͡ʃ
to coughпскʰьэн [pskʲʰan]пскʰьэн [pskʲʰan]псчэн [pst͡ʃan]пскьэн [pskʲan]псчэн [pst͡ʃan]
throatкьый [kʲəj]кьый [kʲəj]чый [t͡ʃəj]кьий [kʲəj]чий [t͡ʃəj]
spleenкьэ [kʲa]кьэ [kʲa]чэ [t͡ʃa]кьэ [kʲa]чэ [t͡ʃa]
glassапкь [aːpkʲ]апкь [aːpkʲ]апч [aːpt͡ʃ]абгь [ʔaːbɡʲ]абдж [ʔaːbd͡ʒ]
chickenкьэт [kʲat]кьэт [kʲat]чэты [t͡ʃatə]гьэд [ɡʲad]джэд [d͡ʒad]
Shift: ɡʲd͡ʒ
gameгьэгу [ɡʲaɡʷ]гьэгу [ɡʲaɡʷ]джэгу [d͡ʒaɡʷ]гьэгу [ɡʲaɡʷ]джэгу [d͡ʒaɡʷ]
shirtгьанэ [ɡʲaːna]гьанэ [ɡʲaːna]джанэ [d͡ʒaːna]гьанэ [ɡʲaːna]джанэ [d͡ʒaːna]
to studyегьэн [jaɡʲan]егьэн [jaɡʲan]еджэн [jad͡ʒan]егьэн [jaɡʲan]еджэн [jad͡ʒan]
sickсымагьэ [səmaːɡʲa]сымагьэ [səmaːɡʲa]сымаджэ [səmaːd͡ʒa]сымагьэ [səmaːɡʲa]сымаджэ [səmaːd͡ʒa]
evilбзагьэ [bzaːɡʲa]бзагьэ [bzaːɡʲa]бзаджэ [bzaːd͡ʒa]бзагьэ [bzaːɡʲa]бзаджэ [bzaːd͡ʒa]
bitterдыгь [dəɡʲ]дыгьы [dəɡʲə]дыджы [dəd͡ʒə]дыгь [dəɡʲ]дыдж [dəd͡ʒ]
Shift: kʲʼt͡ʃʼ
shortкӏьако [kʲʼaːkʷa]кӏьако [kʲʼaːkʷa]чӏако [t͡ʃʼaːkʷa]кӏьагуэ [kʲʼaːɡʷa]чӏагуэ [t͡ʃʼaːɡʷa]
ropeкӏьапсэ [kʲʼaːpsa]кӏьапсэ [kʲʼaːpsa]чӏапсэ [t͡ʃʼaːpsa]кӏьапсэ [kʲʼaːpsa]чӏапсэ [t͡ʃʼaːpsa]
eggкӏьэнкӏьэ [kʲʼankʲʼa]кӏьакӏьэ [kʲʼaːkʲʼa]чӏэнчӏэ [t͡ʃʼant͡ʃʼa]гьэдыкӏэ [ɡʲadəkʲʼa]джэдыкӏэ [d͡ʒadət͡ʃʼa]
gunкӏьэрахъуэ [kʲʼaraːχʷa]кӏьэрахъуэ [kʲʼaraːχʷa]чӏэрахъо [t͡ʃʼaraːχʷa]кӏьэрахъуэ [kʲʼaraːχʷa]кӏэрахъуэ [t͡ʃʼaraːχʷa]
keyӏункӏьыбзэ [ʔʷənkʲʼəbza]ӏункӏьыбзэ [ʔʷənkʲʼəbza]ӏунчӏыбзэ [ʔʷənt͡ʃʼəbza]ӏункӏьыбзэ [ʔʷənkʲʼəbza]ӏунчӏыбз [ʔʷənt͡ʃʼəbz]
ceilingкӏьашъо [kʲʼaːʃʷa]кӏьашъо [kʲʼaːʃʷa]чӏашъо [t͡ʃʼaːʃʷa]кӏьафэ [kʲʼaːfa]чӏафэ [t͡ʃʼaːfa]
beardжьа кӏьэ [ʑaːkʲʼa]жьа кӏьэ [ʑaːkʲʼa]жачӏэ [ʒaːt͡ʃʼa]жьакӏьэ [ʑaːkʲʼa]жьачӏэ [ʑaːt͡ʃʼa]
tailкӏьэ [kʲʼa]кӏьэ [kʲʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]кӏьэ [kʲʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]
to killукӏьын [wkʲʼən]укӏьын [wkʲʼən]учӏын [wt͡ʃʼən]укӏьын [wkʲʼən]учӏын [wt͡ʃʼən]
nitцӏакӏьэсӏакӏьэцӏакӏьэцӏакӏьэцӏачӏэ
smithyк1ыыщк1ыыщч1ыыщк1ыыщч1ыыщ
Summary of Dialectal Evolution
edit

Because the two phases were independent, each dialect can be classified simply by asking two yes/no questions: did it undergo Phase 1, and did it undergo Phase 2? The four possible answers give four neat groups:

  • Shapsug & Besleney — neither phase. These are the most conservative dialects. They preserve both the original affricates and the original palatalized velars as separate sounds, which is precisely why linguists lean on them to reconstruct Proto-Circassian.
  • Bzhedug & Chemguy — Phase 2 only. They kept the original affricates but shifted their velars into affricates. Because the old affricates were still present, the new ones from the velars simply merged in with them.
  • Some Kabardian dialects (e.g. Uzunyayla) — Phase 1 only. They turned the original affricates into fricatives, but their soft velars never advanced, so words like кӏьэ "tail" still keep their kʲʼ.
  • Abzakh & Modern Standard Kabardian — both phases. First the original affricates spirantized (Phase 1), and then the velars moved in to become the new affricates (Phase 2). This two-step "chain shift" is why a modern чӏ in these dialects descends from an old velar кӏь, not from the old affricate чӏ (which is now щӏ).

The cleanest way to see all of this is to follow two words side by side: one built on an original affricate (so it only ever reacts to Phase 1) and one built on an original palatalized velar (so it only ever reacts to Phase 2). The table below does exactly that.

Word Proto
Circassian
Shapsug
(No Phases)
Besleney
(No Phases)
Bzhedug
Chemguy
(Phase 2 Only)
Some Kabardian
dialects
(Phase 1 Only)
Abzakh
(Both Phases)
Standard
Kabardian
(Both Phases)
tailкӏьэ [kʲʼa]кӏьэ [kʲʼa]кӏьэ [kʲʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]кӏьэ [kʲʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]
newчӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]кӏьэ [t͡ʃʼa]чӏэ [t͡ʃʼa]щӏэ [ʃʼa]щӏэ [ʃʼa]щӏэ [ʃʼa]
winterчӏымахуэ [t͡ʃʼəmaːxʷa]чӏымафэ [t͡ʃʼəmaːfa]чӏымахуэ [t͡ʃʼəmaːxʷa]чӏымафэ [t͡ʃʼəmaːfa]щӏымахуэ [ʃʼəmaːxʷa]щӏымафэ [ʃʼəmaːfa]щӏымахуэ [ʃʼəmaːxʷa]
mustacheпачӏэ [paːt͡ʃʼa]пачӏэ [paːt͡ʃʼa]пачӏэ [paːt͡ʃʼa]пачӏэ [paːt͡ʃʼa]пащӏэ [paːʃʼa]пащӏэ [paːʃʼa]пащӏэ [paːʃʼa]

Introduction of Labiodental Fricatives

edit

Proto-Circassian lacked the labiodental fricatives: the voiceless labiodental fricative [f] and the voiced labiodental fricative [v]. These sounds developed independently in the Western (Adyghe) and Eastern (Kabardian) dialects from completely different phonological sources.

In summary:

Western Shift (Velar to Labiodental)
edit

In Western Circassian dialects (such as Abzakh, Bzhedug, Chemguy, and Shapsug), the Proto-Circassian labialized voiceless velar fricative [xʷ] ху shifted to the voiceless labiodental fricative [f] ф.[27]

In Eastern dialects (Kabardian and Besleney), this consonant remained a velar [xʷ].

  • хуf ф
Western Shift: f
Word Proto
Circassian
Western
(Shifted)
Eastern
(Retained)
humanцӏыху [t͡sʼəxʷ]цӏыф [t͡sʼəf]цӏыху [t͡sʼəxʷ]
whiteхужь [xʷəʑ]фыжьы [fəʑə]хужь [xʷəʑ]
hotхуабэ [xʷaːba]фабэ [faːba]хуабэ [xʷaːba]
dayмахо [maːxʷa]мафэ [maːfa]махуэ [maːxʷa]
Eastern Shift (Sibilant to Labiodental)
edit

In Eastern Circassian dialects, a series of Proto-Circassian labialized postalveolar consonants (t͡ɕʷ, ʑʷ, ɕʷ, ɕʷʼ) shifted to become labiodental consonants.

In Western dialects, these consonants retained their original sibilant nature (pronounced as t͡ɕʷ, ʑʷ, ɕʷ, ɕʷʼ).

The specific shifts in Eastern dialects were[28]:

Eastern Shift: Sibilants → Labiodentals
Word Proto
Circassian
Western
(Retained)
Eastern
(Shifted)
Shift: t͡ɕʷv
oxцу [t͡ɕʷə]цу [t͡ɕʷə]вы [və]
shoeцуакъэ [t͡ɕʷaːqa]цуакъэ [t͡ɕʷaːqa]вакъэ [vaːqa]
Shift: ʑʷv
starжъуагъо [ʑʷaːʁʷa]жъуагъо [ʑʷaːʁʷa]вагъуэ [vaːʁʷa]
stoneмыжъо [məʑʷa]мыжъо [məʑʷa]мывэ [məva]
narrowзэжъу [zaʑʷə]зэжъу [zaʑʷə]зэвы [zavə]
Shift: ɕʷf
you (pl.)шъо [ɕʷa]шъо [ɕʷa]фэ [fa]
honeyшъоу [ɕʷaw]шъоу [ɕʷaw]фо [faw]
wifeшъуз [ɕʷəz]шъуз [ɕʷəz]фыз [fəz]
Shift: ɕʷʼ
blackшӏуцӏэ [ɕʷʼət͡sʼa]шӏуцӏэ [ɕʷʼət͡sʼa]фӏыцӏэ [fʼət͡sʼa]
fireмашӏо [maːɕʷʼa]машӏо [maːɕʷʼa]мафӏэ [maːfʼa]
dirtyшӏои [ɕʷʼajə]шӏои [ɕʷʼajə]фӏей [fʼaj]
Divergence Example: "Light" vs. "Blind"
edit

An interesting consequence of these opposing phonological shifts is the divergence of the words for "light" and "blind".

Proto-Circassian possessed two distinct words:

  • Light: naxʷ нэху (containing the velar )
  • Blind: naɕʷ нэшъу (containing the sibilant ɕʷ)

Due to the different sources of the labiodental [f] in the dialects, these words shifted in opposite directions:

  • In Western (Adyghe): The velar became f. Therefore, "light" became нэф. The sibilant ɕʷ was retained, so "blind" remained нэшъу.
  • In Eastern (Kabardian): The sibilant ɕʷ became f. Therefore, "blind" became нэф. The velar was retained, so "light" remained нэху.

As a result, the word нэф is a "false friend" between the dialects: it means light in Adyghe, but blind in Kabardian.

Evolution of "Light" and "Blind"
Meaning Proto-Circassian Western (Adyghe) Eastern (Kabardian)
Shift Result Shift Result
Lightнэху [naxʷ]fнэф [naf](Retained)нэху [naxʷ]
Blindнэшъу [naɕʷ](Retained)нэшъу [naɕʷ]ɕʷfнэф [naf]
Morphological Impact: Benefactive vs. Malefactive Prefixes
edit

The phonological shifts also affected grammatical prefixes, creating distinct forms for the Benefactive and Malefactive prefixes in the modern dialects.

In Proto-Circassian, these prefixes were distinct:

  • Benefactive ("for"): xʷa хуэ — containing the velar .
  • Malefactive ("to the detriment of"): ɕʷʼa шӏуэ — containing the ejective sibilant ɕʷʼ.

Due to the shifts:

  • In Western (Adyghe): The Benefactive xʷa became fa фэ, while the Malefactive ɕʷʼa was retained as шӏуэ.
  • In Eastern (Kabardian): The Benefactive xʷa was retained as хуэ, while the Malefactive ɕʷʼa shifted to fʼa фӏэ.
Comparison of Prefixes
Function Proto
Circassian
Western (Adyghe) Eastern (Kabardian)
Benefactive
(for someone's sake)
хуэ- [xʷa-]фэ- [fa-]хуэ- [xʷa-]
Malefactive
(to someone's detriment)
шӏуэ- [ɕʷʼa-]шӏуэ- [ɕʷʼa-]фӏэ- [fʼa-]

Examples of verbs utilizing these prefixes:

Meaning Proto
Circassian
Western (Adyghe) Eastern (Kabardian)
to go for someone's sakeхуэкӏуэн [xʷakʷʼan]фэкӏон [fakʷʼan]хуэкӏуэн [xʷakʷʼan]
to lose
(lit. to go from someone)
шӏуэкӏуэн [ɕʷʼakʷʼan]шӏуэкӏон [ɕʷʼakʷʼan]фӏэкӏуэн [fʼakʷʼan]
to take for someone's sakeхуэхьын [xʷaħən]фэхьын [faħən]хуэхьын [xʷaħən]
to take away from
(forcefully)
шӏуэхьын [ɕʷʼaħən]шӏуэхьын [ɕʷʼaħən]фӏэхьын [fʼaħən]
Glottalized uvular qʼ
edit

The Common Circassian glottalized uvular *qʼ became a plain glottal stop ʔ in most Circassian dialects, while it was preserved as in the Hakutsw (Hakuchey) subdialect of Shapsug.[29]

Word Proto-Circassian Bzhedugh / Temirgoy / Abzakh / Kabardian Hakutsw Shapsug
Shift: ʔ
hand, armӏэ [ʔa]ӏэ [ʔa]къӏэ [qʼa]
haystackӏатӏэ [ʔaːtʰa]ӏатӏэ [ʔaːta]къӏатӏэ [qʼaːta]
Shift: qʼʷʔʷ
cleverӏушэ [ʔʷaśa]ӏушэ [ʔʷaś]къӏушэ [qʷʼaśa]
nailӏунэ [ʔʷəna]ӏунэ [ʔʷəna]къӏунэ [qʷʼəna]
to turn, windӏантӏэ [ʔʷaːnta]ӏантӏэ [ʔʷaːnta]къӏантӏэ [qʷʼaːnta]

Grammar

edit

Dynamic prefix *wa-

edit

In Proto-Circassian, the dynamic prefix is reconstructed as *wa- (уэ-).[30] This verbal morpheme spans across several grammatical categories, strictly indicating that a verb is operating in the positive, dynamic, present tense. As the languages diverged, this prefix underwent distinct phonological shifts:

Dialectal Shifts of the Dynamic Prefix
BranchShiftPhraseMorphologyTranslation
West Circassian (Adyghe)-э- ([-a-])сэ сэкӀосэ с-э-кӀоI go
East Circassian (Kabardian)-о- ([-o-])сэ сокӀуэсэ с-о-кӀуэI go

In some specific verb roots, the East Circassian (Kabardian) branch preserves the ancestral *wa- (уэ-) more transparently than West Circassian. For instance, in the dynamic verb for "standing/spending time," Kabardian retains the form щ-уэ-ты-р, whereas West Circassian fully reduces the prefix to щ-э-ты.[30]

The historical reduction of the ancestral *wa- (уэ-) to the modern -э- in West Circassian is clearly visible in the conjugation of monovalent intransitive verbs without prefixes (such as "to go"). Through a process of vowel dropping and assimilation, the original forms simplified:[30]

  • 1st Person Singular: сэ-кӀо (I go) < *с-уэ-кӀо < *сы-уэ-кӀо
  • 2nd Person Singular: о-кӀо / уэ-кӀо (You go) < *у-уэ-кӀо < *уы-уэ-кӀо
  • 1st Person Plural: тэ-кӀо (We go) < *т-уэ-кӀо < *ты-уэ-кӀо
  • 2nd Person Plural: шъо-кӀо / шъу-э-кӀо (You all go) < *шъу-уэ-кӀо < *шъуы-уэ-кӀо

The presence of the dynamic prefix is highly restricted. It is completely dropped from the verb complex under the following grammatical conditions:

Non-Present Tenses: It is omitted in the past and future tenses, allowing personal pronouns to attach directly to the verb root or relational prefixes. For example, while the dynamic prefix is active in the present tense, it is entirely absent in past forms such as сы-кIуагъ (I went), у-кIуагъ (You went), кIуагъэ (He went), and с-тхыгъэ (I wrote that).[31]

BranchTensePhraseMorphologyTranslation
WestPresentсэ сэкӀосэ с-э-кӀоI go
Pastсэ скӀуагъсэ с-кӀу-агъI went
EastPresentсэ сокӀуэсэ с-о-кӀуэI go
Pastсэ скӀуащсэ с-кӀу-ащI went

Negative Polarity: It is dropped in negative forms across all tenses, including the present tense.

BranchPolarityPhraseMorphologyTranslation
WestPositiveсэ сэкӀосэ с-э-кӀоI go
Negativeсэ скӀорэпсэ с-кӀо-рэпI do not go
EastPositiveсэ сокӀуэсэ с-о-кӀуэI go
Negativeсэ сыкӀуэркъымсэ сы-кӀуэ-ркъымI do not go

Conditionals and Conjunctions: The addition of suffixes such as -мэ (if), -ми (even if), or adverbial suffixes like (while) strips the verb of its dynamic prefix.

BranchFormPhraseMorphologyTranslation
WestStandardсэ сэкӀосэ с-э-кӀоI go
ConditionalсыкӀомэсы-кӀо-мэIf I go
EastStandardсэ сокӀуэсэ с-о-кӀуэI go
ConditionalсыкӀуэмэсы-кӀуэ-мэIf I go

The мэ- (ma-) Mutation

edit

The morphological placement of the dynamic prefix typically falls between the personal pronoun prefixes and the verb root. However, a significant structural mutation occurs in monovalent intransitive verbs when conjugated for the third person (he/she/it/they).

Because the third-person absolutive index in Circassian is a null prefix (∅-), the dynamic prefix is forced into the absolute word-initial position. Since Circassian phonotactics do not permit the dynamic vowels (-э- or -о-) to stand alone at the beginning of a word without a preceding consonant, the prefix mutates into мэ- (ma-) in both the West and East branches (e.g., ∅-э-кӀо mutates to макӀо).[30]

This mutation is exclusively a feature of the positive present tense, as the dynamic prefix drops out entirely under other conditions. When the dynamic prefix is omitted, the мэ- mutation naturally disappears alongside it, leaving the root exposed:

Non-Present Tenses:

BranchTensePhraseMorphologyTranslation
WestPresentар макӀоар ∅-мэ-кӀоHe goes
Pastар кӀуагъар ∅-кӀу-агъHe went
EastPresentар макӀуэар ∅-мэ-кӀуэHe goes
Pastар кӀуащар ∅-кӀу-ащHe went

Negative Polarity:

BranchPolarityPhraseMorphologyTranslation
WestPositiveар макӀоар ∅-мэ-кӀоHe goes
Negativeар кӀорэпар ∅-кӀо-рэпHe does not go
EastPositiveар макӀуэар ∅-мэ-кӀуэHe goes
Negativeар кӀуэркъымар ∅-кӀуэ-ркъымHe does not go

Conditionals and Conjunctions:

BranchFormPhraseMorphologyTranslation
WestStandardмакӀо∅-мэ-кӀоHe goes
ConditionalкӀомэ∅-кӀо-мэIf he goes
EastStandardмакӀуэ∅-мэ-кӀуэHe goes
ConditionalкӀуэмэ∅-кӀуэ-мэIf he goes

Intransitive Verbs with Spatial Prefixes

edit

When a monovalent intransitive verb includes a spatial or directional prefix (such as къ- meaning "hither" or щ- indicating location), the dynamic prefix is sandwiched between this spatial prefix and the verb root. In these environments across all grammatical persons, the ancestral *wa- consistently reduces to -э- in modern West Circassian:[31]

Evolution of the Dynamic Prefix with Spatial Prefixes
Verb ComplexPre-Modern FormAncestral FormTranslation
сы-къ-э-кӀо*сы-къ-уэ-кӀо*сы-къэ-уэ-кӀоI am coming here
у-къ-э-кӀо*у-къ-уэ-кӀо*у-къэ-уэ-кӀоYou are coming here
къ-э-кӀо*къ-уэ-кӀо*къэ-уэ-кӀоHe/she/it is coming here
сы-щ-э-уцу*сы-щ-уэ-уцу*сы-щы-уэ-уцуI stop there
у-щ-э-уцу*у-щ-уэ-уцу*у-щы-уэ-уцуYou stop there
щ-э-уцу*щ-уэ-уцу*щы-уэ-уцуHe/she/it stops there

Bivalent Intransitive Verbs

edit

Bivalent intransitive verbs take an absolutive subject and an oblique indirect object. Because the dynamic prefix sits between the personal pronouns and the verb root in these cases, it is no longer in the word-initial position. Consequently, it never mutates into мэ- (ma-). Instead, it acts as a phonetic glue that often "swallows" or blends with adjacent vowels.

In Proto-Circassian, the underlying dynamic prefix *wa- (уэ-) clustered with the preceding indirect object pronouns. The ancestral combinations for "I look at him", "I look at you", and "I look at y'all" were reconstructed with the prefix sequence absolutive + oblique + dynamic prefix + root. These Proto-Circassian clusters effectively functioned as:

  • I look at him: *сы-й-уэ-плъ
  • I look at you: *сы-у-уэ-плъ
  • I look at y'all: *сы-шъу-уэ-плъ

As the branches diverged, these sequences evolved based on their respective dynamic prefix shifts. In West Circassian, the *wa- simplified to -э-, while in East Circassian, the *w+a contraction resulted in the rounded -о- (creating the intermediate/Eastern forms сы-й-о-плъ, сы-у-о-плъ, and сы-шъу-о-плъ).

Evolution of Bivalent Intransitive Prefixes (Present Tense)
Proto-CircassianBranchPhraseMorphologyTranslation
*сы-й-уэ-плъWestсэ сеплъысэ сы-й-э-плъыI look at him/it
Eastсэ соплъсэ сы-й-о-плъI look at him/it
*сы-у-уэ-плъWestсэ уэ суэплъысэ уэ с-у-э-плъыI look at you
Eastсэ уэ соплъсэ уэ сы-у-о-плъI look at you
*сы-шъу-уэ-плъWestсэ шъуэ сшъуэплъысэ шъуэ с-шъу-э-плъыI look at y'all
Eastсэ фэ сывоплъсэ фэ сы-в-о-плъI look at y'all
Distinguishing the Tense Marker from the Pronoun
edit

Because the dynamic prefix drops out in the past tense, it is crucial not to mistake phonetic pronoun contractions for the present tense dynamic marker.

For example, look closely at the East Circassian (Kabardian) past tense for "I looked at you" (сыноплъащ). The "о" here is not the dynamic prefix. The present tense dynamic prefix was dropped. Instead, the "о" in the past tense is the phonetic contraction of the 2nd person singular pronoun уэ blending with the preceding relational prefix (сы-ны-уэ-плъ-ащ).

If we compare the 2nd person singular past tense with the plural form, we can clearly see that the plural form lacks the "о", confirming it was just a pronoun contraction and not a tense marker:

Distinguishing Pronouns from Tense Markers (East Circassian)
TensePhraseMorphologyTranslationPresence of Dynamic Prefix
Presentсэ уэ сыноплъсэ уэ сы-ны-у-о-плъI look at youYes (о = dynamic prefix)
Pastсэ уэ сыноплъащсэ уэ сы-ны-уэ-плъ-ащI looked at youNo (о sound = pronoun уэ)
Presentсэ фэ сынывоплъсэ фэ сы-ны-в-о-плъI look at y'allYes (о = dynamic prefix)
Pastсэ фэ сынывэплъащсэ фэ сы-ны-вэ-плъ-ащI looked at y'allNo (Dynamic prefix is absent)

Transitive Dynamic Verbs

edit

The dynamic prefix is equally present in transitive dynamic verbs operating in the present tense. Just as with intransitive verbs, the ancestral *wa- (уэ-) sits between the personal prefixes and the verb root, undergoing reduction and blending with adjacent sounds:[31]

  • 1st Person Singular: с-э-тхы (I write that) < *с-уэ-тхы
  • 2nd Person Singular: о-тхы / у-э-тхы (You write that) < *у-уэ-тхы
  • 3rd Person Singular: е-тхы / й-э-тхы (He/she writes that) < *й-уэ-тхы < *йы-уэ-тхы

Function in Static and Dynamic Counterparts

edit

In Circassian grammar, verbs are fundamentally divided into static verbs (expressing a fixed state of being) and dynamic verbs (expressing an action or transition). The dynamic prefix is the central morphological tool used to derive dynamic counterparts from static roots, nouns, and adjectives.[30]

Deriving from Nouns and Adjectives
edit

The dynamic prefix can be attached to words expressing the quality of an object (adjectives) or a profession (nouns) to create active dynamic verbs. When conjugated in the third-person present tense, these take the мэ- mutation:

  • From Nouns: The noun пхъашIэ (carpenter) forms the static phrase ар пхъашIэ (he is a carpenter). Adding the dynamic prefix creates ар мэпхъашIэ (he works/acts as a carpenter).[30]
  • From Adjectives: The adjective бзаджэ (evil) forms the static phrase ар бзаджэ (he is evil). Adding the dynamic prefix creates ар мэбзаджэ (he is becoming evil).[30]
Terminal Vowel Retention
edit

The presence of the dynamic prefix also affects the phonetic structure of the verb's ending. Static verbs in the first and second-person present tense typically drop their terminal vowels (э and ы). In contrast, dynamic verbs bearing the dynamic prefix retain these final vowels.

  • Static: сэ сы-щыт (I stand - conveying a state of being)
  • Dynamic: сэ сы-щэты (I am standing / I spend time standing - conveying an action)[32]
Transitive Static Verbs
edit

While most transitive verbs in Circassian are inherently dynamic, the verb Iыгъын (to hold) is a unique bivalent transitive static verb. In its standard present-tense form (с-Iыгъ, "I hold"), it lacks the dynamic prefix because it expresses a state. However, it can take the dynamic prefix to form a dynamic variant, с-э-Iыгъы (derived from *с-уэ-Iыгъы), which instead conveys a habitual or ongoing action ("I hold it generally/often").[31]

Dynamic present suffix *-r

edit

Proto-Circassian featured a dynamic present tense suffix *-r.[33] It is crucial to note that this suffix attached exclusively to dynamic verbs (actions or events). Stative verbs (expressing continuous states, such as "to stand") did not take this suffix in Proto-Circassian, and therefore lack any reflex of *-р in their modern paradigms.[34] In the modern normal positive present tense, this suffix has been completely elided in the word-final position in the West Circassian (Adyghe) branch. However, the historical *-r surfaces in both branches under specific morphological conditions where it is protected by a subsequent suffix, preserved in fossilized forms, or kept as an optional marker in East Circassian.[35]

In both West and East Circassian, the -r appears in the negative present form, preceding the negation suffix:

  • West: ар кӀорэп, сэ скӀорэп[36]
  • East: ар кӀуэркъым, сэ скӀуэркъым[34]

In West Circassian, the suffix is retained in participles, when conjunctions are added, and in certain lexicalized relicts:[36]

  • Present participles: кӀорэр (the one who goes, absolutive case), кӀорэм (oblique case), кӀорэмкӀэ (instrumental case)
  • Coordination suffix (-i / "and"): кӀори (goes and...)
  • Lexical relicts: The suffix has fossilized in certain derived words, such as the noun and adjective стыр ("burn" or "spicy"), which derives from the verb стын ("to burn").

In East Circassian (Kabardian), the suffix is preserved in imperfect forms, interrogatives, participles, lexical relicts, adverbial constructions, and optionally in the positive present tense:[35]

  • Optional present tense: Unlike Adyghe, modern Kabardian allows the suffix to optionally surface in standard dynamic verbs in the present tense: сэ сокӀуэ / сокӀуэр ("I go"), ар макӀуэ / макӀуэр ("he goes").[37]
  • Imperfect: сэ сефэрт (I used to drink), сэ скӀуэрт (I used to go)
  • Interrogative: ар кӀуэрэ пӀэрэ? (does he go?)
  • Adverbial form: ар кӀуэурэ (going / as he goes)
  • Present participles: The suffix is consistently retained in infinite participle forms: макӀуэр ("the one who goes", absolutive case), сызэрэкӀуэр ("how I go").[38]
  • Lexical relicts: Fossilized in certain substantivized participles (nouns and adjectives), such as пшътыр ("hot/hotness"), гъуыр ("dry"), and плъыр ("guard/watchman").[39]

The following table demonstrates the reconstructed Proto-Circassian present tense paradigm using the verb "to go" alongside its modern descendants, illustrating the loss of the word-final *-r:[33]

Present Tense Evolution ("to go")
PersonProto-CircassianWest Circassian (Adyghe)East Circassian (Kabardian)
1st sg.сэ с-уэ-кӀуэ-рсэ сэкӀосэ сокӀуэ
2nd sg.уэ у-уэ-кӀуэ-ро окӀоуэ уокӀуэ
3rd sg.ар ма-кӀуэ-рар макӀоар макӀуэ
1st pl.тэ т-уэ-кӀуэ-ртэ тэкӀодэ докӀуэ
2nd pl.шъуэ шъу-уэ-кӀуэ-ршъо шъокӀофэ фокӀуэ
3rd pl.ахэр ма-кӀуэ-хэ-рахэр макӀохахэр макӀуэ

Negative prefix *mə-

edit

In Proto-Circassian, verbal negation was primarily marked by the prefix *mə- (мы-). While this prefix survives in both the modern West Circassian (Adyghe) and East Circassian (Kabardian) branches, both languages have innovated by developing additional, distinct negative suffixes for standard indicative verb forms. West Circassian developed the suffix -ep (-эп), while East Circassian developed -q'əm (-къым).

The evolution of Circassian negation created a strict grammatical division between finite (declarative) and non-finite or dependent verbs. The modern negative suffixes entirely took over the standard indicative forms in declarative sentences across the present, past, and future tenses. However, the historical Proto-Circassian prefix *mə- (мы-) is strictly preserved in both modern branches under specific grammatical conditions where the new suffixes cannot be used. Namely, the original prefix remains mandatory in non-finite forms (such as participles and verbal nouns), dependent clauses (such as conditionals and concessives), and non-declarative moods (such as imperatives/prohibitives).[40][41][42][43]

The following table illustrates the divergence toward suffixal negation across standard indicative tenses using the verb "to go" in the third-person singular (ar, "he/she/it"):

Evolution of Negative Indicative Forms ("he does not go")
TenseProto-CircassianWest Circassian (Adyghe)East Circassian (Kabardian)
Presentар мыкӀуэрар кӀорэпар кӀуэркъым
Pastар мыкӀуагъэар кӀуагъэпар кӀуакъым
Futureар мыкӀуэн(у)ар кӀощтэпар кӀуэнукъым

As noted, despite this shift in standard declarative sentences, the historical prefix *mə- is retained in the following constructions:

  • Conditionals: Negation within a conditional clause retains the prefix.
    • Positive: кӀомэ (if he goes)
    • Negative: мыкӀомэ (if he does not go)
  • Concessives: Similarly, verbs taking the concessive suffix (-i, "even if") use the prefix.
    • Positive: кӀоми (even if he goes)
    • Negative: мыкӀоми (even if he does not go)
  • Imperatives: Negative commands (prohibitives) utilize the prefix alongside the second-person index.
    • Positive: КӀо! (Go!)
    • Negative: УмыкӀу! (Do not go!)
  • Participles and Verbal Nouns: Infinite verbal forms maintain prefixal negation.
    • Negative participle: мыкӀорэр (the one who does not go)

Past Tense in Proto-Circassian

edit

In Proto-Circassian, the past tense was historically marked by the suffix *-гъэ (-ğă).[44] Following the split of the proto-language, this suffix evolved differently across the modern Circassian branches. In West Circassian (Adyghe), the original Proto-Circassian suffix is strictly preserved. In East Circassian (Kabardian), however, the suffix underwent a phonetic shift, merging with the preceding vowel to form the long vowel .[45]

Linguists N. F. Jakovlev and D. A. Ashkhamaf theorized that this past tense suffix did not originally emerge as a grammatical marker. Through etymological reconstruction, they traced the suffix *-гъэ back to independent primary noun roots related to time—specifically гъэ (meaning "year" or "summer") and гъуэ (meaning "time", "season", or "period"). Over time, these nominal roots grammaticalized, losing their independent lexical meanings to become the standard tense suffix for past actions across the Circassian language family.[46]

The following table illustrates the divergence of the past tense suffix between the modern branches:

Evolution of the Past Tense Suffix
VerbProto-CircassianWest Circassian (Adyghe)East Circassian (Kabardian)
to go (кӀуэн)*кӀуагъэкӀуагъэкӀуа
to write (тхын)*тхыгъэтхыгъэтха
to read (еджэн)*еджагъэеджагъэеджа

Future Tense in Proto-Circassian

edit

The reconstruction of the future tense in Proto-Circassian (Common Circassian) presents a complex case due to significant divergence between the modern branches. Linguists identify the historical Proto-Circassian future tense as being marked by the suffix *-н (-n). This historical verbal base is highly conservative, phonetically coinciding with—and serving as the direct origin of—the Circassian infinitive (неопределенная форма глагола).[47]

However, the affixes expressing the standard declarative future tense differ drastically between modern West Circassian (Adyghe) and East Circassian (Kabardian), to the point that they cannot be explained by simple phonetic derivation from a single proto-form. West Circassian innovated by developing the suffix -щт (historically -шьт), while East Circassian retained and adapted the historical *-н alongside the declarative suffix (resulting in -нущ for Future I and -нщ for Future II).[48]

It is important to note that the щ in the West Circassian future suffix -щт is etymologically unrelated to the East Circassian suffix . In Kabardian, the is a later morphological innovation appended to the end of verbs to mark affirmative declarative statements. In contrast, the Adyghe щ is an inherent part of the future tense marker itself. In some West Circassian dialects, this suffix is simplified to merely (e.g., кӀот), most likely dropping the fricative щ to ease pronunciation.

Despite the divergence in the primary future tense, the historical *-н suffix strictly survives in both branches' secondary future or obligative moods (Future II). Modern Adyghe uses for its Future II tense (meaning "must" or "will possibly"). Kabardian utilizes the suffix -нщ (from + affirmative ) for its Future II tense, while adapting it into the extended suffix -нущ for its primary Future I tense.[49]

The following table demonstrates the divergence in future tense marking using the verb "to go" (кӀуэн) in the third-person singular (ar, "he/she/it"):

Evolution of Future Tense Forms
TenseProto-CircassianWest Circassian (Adyghe)East Circassian (Kabardian)
Future I (Definite)*ар кӀуэн(у)ар кӀощт (dial. ар кӀот)ар кӀуэнущ
Future II (Possible/Obligative)*ар кӀуэнар кӀонар кӀуэнщ

A notable piece of evidence for the antiquity of the future tense suffix *-н is its fossilization into everyday vocabulary. Because this tense denoted an action that will happen or is intended to happen, it was historically used to form substantivized verbs (nouns). Several primary Circassian nouns trace their origins directly back to this future tense base:[50]

  • шхын ("food" or "meal"): literally "that which will be eaten" (from the root шхы-, to eat).
  • тыны ("gift"): literally "that which will be given" (from the root ты-, to give).
  • щыгъын ("clothing"): literally "that which will be worn" (from the root щыгъы-, to wear).

Fossilized Noun Classes

edit

While modern Circassian languages do not have a productive system of grammatical gender or noun classes, Proto-Circassian originally possessed grammatical class markers that distinguished between humans and inanimate objects. According to the comparative-historical research of linguist G. V. Rogava, ancient Circassian noun stems were built using specific class prefixes and determinative suffixes.[51] Over centuries of language development, these class markers either fell off entirely or fused into the roots, becoming a "dead" (fossilized) morphological inventory.[52]

A surviving relic of this Proto-Circassian grammatical class system is found in the interrogative pronouns, which strictly contrast the "human" class from the "thing" (inanimate) class. The initial с- / шъ- in the inanimate forms is a fossilized Proto-Circassian prefix specifically marking the "class of things":

  • Human Class: хэт (who?), хэти (anyone / everyone)
  • Inanimate Class: сыт / шъыд (what?), сыди / шъыди (anything / everything)

This fossilized inanimate prefix с- is also visible in other interrogative variations, such as the East Circassian (Kabardian) слIо (what?), formed by combining the prefix с- with the interrogative root -лIо. Furthermore, the colloquial variant лIо serves as a prime example of the gradual decay of this obsolete class system. Because the grammatical distinction between humans and things is no longer productive in modern Circassian, the fossilized с- prefix eroded over time in rapid speech, leaving the bare root лIо to function as an independent interrogative pronoun. While all these forms inquire about inanimate objects or concepts, лIо and слIо often carry a more conversational or rhetorical nuance compared to the standard, neutral сыт.

Labile Verbs

edit

Proto-Circassian featured a distinct class of labile verbs—verbs that were completely neutral regarding transitivity. The exact same verbal root could be used in an ergative construction (as a transitive verb) and an absolutive construction (as an intransitive verb) without any morphological changes to the root. Older Circassian grammars (such as those by Z. Kerasheva and N. Gishev) hypothesized that all transitive verbs in Proto-Circassian were originally labile, but modern linguists like M. Kumakhov and K. Vamling argue against this, proving that many core transitives (like s'’ə-n, "to do", or hə-n, "to carry") were always strictly stable.[53][54]

Kumakhov and Vamling positively identify a specific set of verbs that were truly labile in Proto-Circassian. These include roots like *z˚e / *ve ("to plough"), *le ("to paint/dye"), *c’ele ("to spread"), and *p’ət’ə ("to press"). This labile nature allowed the exact same root to function in two entirely different syntactic frameworks:

  • Transitive (Ergative construction): ЛIы-м щIыгу-р е-жъо (The man is ploughing the field). Here, the verb takes a direct object ("field" in the absolutive case) and the subject is marked with the ergative case ().
  • Intransitive (Absolutive construction): ЛIы-р ма-жъо (The man is ploughing / engaged in ploughing). Here, no direct object is permitted, and the subject is marked with the absolutive case ().

Vowel Gradation (Ablaut) for Transitivity

edit

According to linguists N. F. Jakovlev and D. A. Ashkhamaf, the strict syntactic division between transitive and intransitive verbs did not exist in the earliest stages of the language. Originally, there was a single, undifferentiated syntactic construction. As the language evolved a need to separate "productive" (transitive/object-affecting) actions from "unproductive" (intransitive) actions, Proto-Circassian developed a system of vowel gradation (Ablaut) at the end of the verbal roots to mark this grammatically.[55][56]

After the split of the proto-language, many previously labile verbs were forced into "stable" forms using this vowel alternation. The fundamental rule dictated that the base ending in the vowel «ы» (ə) came to designate a transitive action, while the exact same base ending in the vowel «э» (ă) designated a general, intransitive action. This resulted in modern Circassian verb pairs such as:

  • тхы-н (to write something, transitive) vs. тхэ-н (to write generally, intransitive)
  • ды-н (to sew something, transitive) vs. дэ-н (to sew generally, intransitive)
  • шхы-н (to eat something, transitive) vs. шхэ-н (to eat generally, intransitive)

The "Amorphous" Noun

edit

Before the development of the modern Circassian case system (which uses -m for the ergative and -r for the absolutive), Proto-Circassian went through an "amorphous" stage where nouns lacked formal case affixes entirely. In this ancient period, a bare, uninflected noun was used for all grammatical roles (subject, direct object, indirect object).[57][58]

As the formal case suffixes (-m and -r) developed later to mark specific syntactic roles and definiteness, the ancient uninflected noun did not disappear. This ancient "amorphous" Proto-Circassian noun survives today as the indefinite form of the noun. Modern Circassian still drops all case endings when a noun is used in a generic, non-specific, or indefinite sense, which is a direct syntactic relic of the proto-language's pre-case era:

  • Amorphous / Indefinite Subject: ЛIы мажэ (A man runs) — the noun лIы (man) takes no case marker.
  • Definite Subject: ЛIы-р мажэ (The man runs) — the noun takes the absolutive definite marker .
  • Amorphous / Indefinite Object: Фыз къуажэ кIуащ (A woman went to a village) — the destination къуажэ (village) is completely unmarked.
  • Definite Object: Фызы-р къуажэ-м кIуащ (The woman went to the village) — the destination takes the ergative/oblique definite marker .

Numbers

edit
English Proto-Circassian Ubykh Western Circassian Kabardian
IPA Cyrillic IPA Cyrillic IPA Cyrillic IPA Cyrillic
Oneзыzaзэзызы
Twotʷʼəтӏуtʼqʷʼaткъӏуаtʷʼəтӏуtʷʼəтӏу
Threeɕəщыʂaшъаɕəщыɕəщы
Fourpɬʼəплӏыpʼɬʼəплӏыpɬʼəплӏыpɬʼəплӏы
Fivetxʷəтхуɕxəщхыtfəтфыtxʷəтху
Sixхыфыхыхы
Sevenbɮəблыbləбльыbɮəблыbɮəблы
Eightиʁʷaгъуаии
Ninebʁʷəбгъуbʁʲəбгъьуbʁʷəбгъуbʁʷəбгъу
Tenpʃʼəпшӏыʑʷəжъуыpʃʼəпшӏыpɕʼəпщӏы


Verb Conjugation

edit

The Circassian verb is polypersonal: it agrees with each of its core arguments by a personal prefix, filling up to three roles — absolutive (ABS), ergative (ERG) and oblique (OBL). Paradigms are grouped by valency (one, two or three arguments) and by whether the subject is absolutive (intransitive) or ergative (transitive).

This section reconstructs the Proto-Circassian verb and shows how Adyghe (West) and Kabardian (East) developed from it. Nearly all of the divergence comes down to three recurring developments, described first; every example gives Proto-Circassian beside Modern Adyghe, Proto-Kabardian (the reconstructed older eastern stage) and Modern Kabardian.

Shared developments from Proto-Circassian

edit

The present dynamic: the prefix *-уо- and the suffix *-р

edit

A dynamic verb (an action, as opposed to a static verb of position or state) marked the Proto-Circassian present twice: a prefix *-уо- before the root and a suffix *-р at the end of the word; with no personal prefix to lean on (a bare 3rd-person subject) the prefix was *мэ- instead. The past had neither. Adyghe dropped and fused -уо- into the preceding vowel; Kabardian kept the vowel as -о- but likewise dropped in the plain present (it survives only where something follows it — questions, the imperfect). Static verbs never had any of this, so their present is bare in both branches.

The present dynamic vs. static verbs
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
I look (dynamic)Pres.с-уо-плъэ-рСэплъэСоплъэСоплъэ
he looks (dynamic, 3rd person)Pres.мэ-плъэ-рМаплъэМаплъэМаплъэ
I sit (static)Pres.сы-щысСыщысСыщысщСыщысщ
he sits (static)Pres.щысЩысЩысщЩысщ

The three plural markers, and their loss in Modern Kabardian

edit

The largest difference between the branches is number marking. Proto-Circassian marked a 3rd-person plural separately for each role, with three distinct markers: the absolutive plural suffix *-хэ (Adyghe ), the ergative plural prefix *я- (vs. singular е-/и-) and the oblique plural prefix *я- (vs. е-). Adyghe keeps all three, and Proto-Kabardian still had them — but Modern Kabardian has lost every one: the verb always uses the singular form, and number rests on the free pronoun (ахэр "they", абыхэм "them"). Many Modern Kabardian forms are therefore syncretic — in each pair below the two eastern forms have fallen together while Adyghe keeps them apart.[59]

The three plural markers
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
he looksPres.мэ-плъэ-рМаплъэМаплъэМаплъэ
they look (absolutive plural)Pres.мэ-плъэ-хэ-рМаплъэхМаплъэхэМаплъэ
he sees himPres.е-уо-лъэгъу-рЕлъэгъуЕлъагъуЕлъагъу
they see him (ergative plural)Pres.я-уо-лъэгъу-рАлъэгъуЯлъагъуЕлъагъу
he looks at himPres.е-уо-плъы-рЕплъыЙоплъЙоплъ
he looks at them (oblique plural)Pres.я-уо-плъы-рАплъыЙоплъЙоплъ

Consonant voicing in Kabardian

edit

Kabardian voices Proto's voiceless prefix consonants between vowels in the present — 1sg с-з-, 1pl т-д-, 2pl шъу-ф-/в- — where Adyghe keeps them voiceless.

Kabardian consonant voicing
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
I look (1sg с- → з-)Pres.с-уо-плъэ-рСэплъэСоплъэСоплъэ
we look (1pl т- → д-)Pres.т-уо-плъэ-рТэплъэДоплъэДоплъэ
y'all look (2pl шъу- → ф-)Pres.шъу-уо-плъэ-рШъоплъэФоплъэФоплъэ

The verb classes

edit

Monovalent intransitive: плъэн "to look"

edit

One absolutive subject, one front prefix (1sg сы-/с-, 2sg у-, 1pl ты-/т-, 2pl шъу-; 3rd person Ø). The past suffix is Adyghe -гъ, Kabardian -ащ.

Examples: плъэн "to look"
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
I lookPres.с-уо-плъэ-рСэплъэСоплъэСоплъэ
I lookedPst.сы-плъ-а-гъСыплъагъСыплъащСыплъащ
he looksPres.мэ-плъэ-рМаплъэМаплъэМаплъэ
he lookedPst.плъ-а-гъэПлъагъПлъащПлъащ
they lookPres.мэ-плъэ-хэ-рМаплъэхМаплъэхэМаплъэ
they lookedPst.плъ-а-хэ-гъэПлъагъэхПлъахэщПлъащ

Monovalent static intransitive: щысын "to sit"

edit

The same single absolutive subject, minus all dynamic morphology: the present is bare, closed in Kabardian by the confirmation suffix .

Examples: щысын "to sit"
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
I sitPres.сы-щысСыщысСыщысщСыщысщ
I satPst.сы-щыс-а-гъСыщысыгъСыщысащСыщысащ
he sitsPres.щысЩысЩысщЩысщ
he satPst.щыс-а-гъЩысыгъЩысащЩысащ
they sitPres.щыс-хэЩысыхЩысхэщЩысщ
they satPst.щыс-а-хэ-гъЩысыгъэхЩысахэщЩысащ

Bivalent intransitive: еплъын "to look at"

edit

An absolutive subject plus an oblique object (3sg е-, 3pl я-); no ergative. Kabardian loses the oblique plural ("at him" = "at them") and innovates an obligatory directional prefix in some configurations — a 1st-on-2nd object takes the translocative н-.

Examples: еплъын "to look at"
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
I look at himPres.сы-е-уо-плъы-рСеплъыСоплъСоплъ
I looked at himPst.сы-е-плъ-а-гъСеплъыгъСеплъащСеплъащ
I look at themPres.сы-я-уо-плъы-рСаплъыСоплъСоплъ
I looked at themPst.сы-я-плъ-а-гъСаплъыгъСаплъащСеплъащ
they look at himPres.е-уо-плъы-хэ-рЕплъыхЙоплъыхэЙоплъ
they looked at himPst.е-плъ-а-хэ-гъэЕплъыгъэхЕплъахэщЕплъащ
I look at youPres.сы-уэ-уо-плъы-рСыоплъыСыноплъСыноплъ
I looked at youPst.сы-уэ-плъ-а-гъСыоплъыгъСыноплъащСыноплъащ

Bivalent static intransitive: тесын "to sit on"

edit

A static verb with an oblique object from the possessive series: bare present (Kabardian ) and the same oblique-plural loss. In "they sit on them" both plurals stack: the oblique я- and the absolutive -хэ — Modern Kabardian drops both.

Examples: тесын "to sit on"
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
I sit on himPres.сы-тесСытесСытесщСытесщ
I sat on himPst.сы-тес-а-гъСытесыгъСытесащСытесащ
I sit on themPres.сы-я-тесСатесСатесщСытесщ
I sat on themPst.сы-я-тес-а-гъСатесыгъСатесащСытесащ
he sits on themPres.я-тесАтесЯтесщТесщ
he sat on themPst.я-тес-а-гъАтесыгъЯтесащТесащ
they sit on themPres.я-тес-хэАтесыхЯтесыхэщТесщ
they sat on themPst.я-тес-а-хэ-гъАтесыгъэхЯтесахэщТесащ

Bivalent transitive: лъэгъун "to see"

edit

An ergative agent and an absolutive object. The agent alternates by tense (2sg уэ-/п-, 3sg е-/и-), and both plurals are visible — ergative on the agent, absolutive on the object. The Kabardian root also ablauts (present лъагъу, past лъэгъу), whence the dictionary form лъагъун against Adyghe лъэгъун.

Examples: лъэгъун "to see"
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
I see himPres.с-уо-лъэгъу-рСэлъэгъуСолъагъуСолъагъу
I saw himPst.с-лъэгъу-а-гъСлъэгъугъСлъэгъуащСлъэгъуащ
he sees himPres.е-уо-лъэгъу-рЕлъэгъуЕлъагъуЕлъагъу
he saw himPst.и-лъэгъу-а-гъЫлъэгъугъИлъэгъуащИлъэгъуащ
they see himPres.я-уо-лъэгъу-рАлъэгъуЯлъагъуЕлъагъу
they saw himPst.я-лъэгъу-а-гъАлъэгъугъЯлъэгъуащИлъэгъуащ
he sees themPres.е-уо-лъэгъу-хэ-рЕлъэгъухЕлъагъухэЕлъагъу
he saw themPst.и-лъэгъу-а-хэ-гъэЫлъэгъугъэхИлъэгъуахэщИлъэгъуащ
they see themPres.я-уо-лъэгъу-хэ-рАлъэгъухЯлъагъухэЕлъагъу
they saw themPst.я-лъэгъу-а-хэ-гъэАлъэгъугъэхЯлъэгъуахэщИлъэгъуащ

Trivalent ditransitive: тын "to give"

edit

All three roles: an ergative agent, an absolutive theme and an oblique recipient. A linking -ре-/-ри-/-ра- appears between recipient and agent only when both are 3rd person.[60] With a local theme ("I give you…") the theme prefix у- stands first, and the recipient still shows the singular/plural contrast that Modern Kabardian levels ("I give you to him" = "I give you to them").

Examples: тын "to give"
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
he gives it to himPres.ре-уо-ты-рРетыИретИрет
he gave it to himPst.ри-т-а-гъРитыгъИритащИритащ
they give it to himPres.ра-уо-ты-рРатыИратИрет
they gave it to himPst.ра-т-а-гъРатыгъИратащИритащ
he gives it to themPres.я-ре-уо-ты-рАретыЯретИрет
he gave it to themPst.я-ри-т-а-гъАритыгъЯритащИритащ
I give you to himPres.у-е-с-уо-ты-рУесэтыУзотУзот
I gave you to himPst.у-е-с-т-а-гъУестыгъУестащУестащ
I give you to themPres.у-я-с-уо-ты-рУасэтыУазотУзот
I gave you to themPst.у-я-с-т-а-гъУастыгъУастащУестащ

Reflexives

edit

When two arguments co-refer, the co-referential slot takes a reflexive prefix — зы- for an absolutive, зэ- for an oblique or recipient — and the verb adds the refactive suffix (West -жьы, East /-ыж); everything else stays as in the plain verb.

Reflexive examples
MeaningTenseProto-CircassianAdygheProto-
Kabardian
Modern
Kabardian
he looks at himselfPres.зэ-уо-плъы-жьы-рЗэплъыжьыЗоплъыжЗоплъыж
he looked at himselfPst.зэ-плъы-жь-а-гъЗэплъыжьыгъЗэплъыжащЗэплъыжащ
they look at themselvesPres.зэ-уо-плъы-жьы-хэ-рЗэплъыжьыхЗоплъыжхэЗоплъыж
they looked at themselvesPst.зэ-плъы-жь-а-хэ-гъэЗэплъыжьыгъэхЗэплъыжахэщЗэплъыжащ
I see myselfPres.зы-с-уо-лъэгъу-жьы-рЗысэлъэгъужьыЗысолъагъужЗысолъагъуж
I saw myselfPst.зы-с-лъэгъу-жь-а-гъЗыслъэгъужьыгъЗыслъэгъужащЗыслъэгъужащ
I sit on myselfPres.сы-зэ-тес-жьыСызэтесыжьыСызэтесыжщСызэтесыжщ
I sat on myselfPst.сы-зэ-тес-жь-а-гъСызэтесыжьыгъСызэтесыжащСызэтесыжащ

Schleicher's fable

edit

Schleicher's fable in Proto-Circassian:

χʷǝ č́ʷara-gjǝ

χʷǝ ja laśʷam mә q́ˤ:an

č́ʷara pǝʎ́an;

mǝ χwanǝta k:ʷǝm q:irǝ,

mǝ čʷǝχʷa čʷam,

mǝ ć̣ǝm pasa mǝš́ʷrǝ.

χʷǝ č́ʷara q̇́ˤan:

"źǝʁʷǝ sā ǵʷǝ,

q:ać̣am ć̣arǝ č́ʷara ḳ́ʷarǝ."

č́ʷara q̇́ˤan: "q:́ˤʷa χʷǝ!

źǝʁʷǝ š́a ǵʷǝ ć̣arǝ,

q:ać̣a, ł́a, č́ʷara laśʷam

ʎ́ʷa ḳ́ač̣ʷǝm čǝ-wǝ,

χʷiara-gjǝ laśʷam mә q́ˤ:a."

nǝ q:́aˤʷasa χʷǝ rǝq:ʷada q:ˤʷan.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. Kuipers, A. H. (1975). A Dictionary of Proto-Circassian Roots. PdR Press Publications on North Caucasian Languages 1. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press. pp. 11ff.
  2. Jakovlev, N. F. (1927). Materialy dlja kabardinskogo slovarja.
  3. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 109–116. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  4. Nikolayev, S. L.; Starostin, S. A. (1994). A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk Publishers. pp. 197–199.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. p. 117. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  6. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 117–118. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  7. 1 2 3 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. p. 121. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  8. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 121–122. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  9. 1 2 3 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 118–119. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  10. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 118–119. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  11. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 119–120. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  12. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 119–120. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  13. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 126–127. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  14. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 126–127. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  15. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 122–123. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  16. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 122–123. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  17. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 125–126. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  18. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. pp. 124–125. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  19. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. p. 124. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  20. Kerasheva, Z. I. (1957). Особенности шапсугского диалекта адыгейского языка [Features of the Shapsug Dialect of the Adyghe Language] (in Russian). Maykop: Adyghe Book Publishing House (Адыгейское книжное издательство).
  21. Палатализация (смягчение) и аффрикатизация согласных (in Russian)
  22. Переднеязычные мягкие шипящие аффрикаты дж, ч, к1 (in Russian)
  23. Консонантная система уляпского говора в сопоставлении с аналогами других диалектов адыгских языков (in Russian)
  24. NUP 1996, p. 11.
  25. 1 2 Kerasheva, Z. I. (1957). Особенности шапсугского диалекта адыгейского языка [Features of the Shapsug Dialect of the Adyghe Language] (in Russian). Maykop: Адыгейское книжное издательство. p. 30.
  26. 1 2 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. p. 118. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  27. 1 2 3 Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. p. 127. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  28. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. p. 125. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  29. Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. CNWS Publications. Vol. 48. Leiden: Research School CNWS. p. 120. ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rogava, G. V.; Kerasheva, Z. I. (1966). Грамматика адыгейского языка [Grammar of the Adyghe Language] (in Russian). Krasnodar, Maykop: Краснодарское книжное издательство. p. 102.
  31. 1 2 3 4 Rogava, G. V.; Kerasheva, Z. I. (1966). Грамматика адыгейского языка [Grammar of the Adyghe Language] (in Russian). Krasnodar, Maykop: Краснодарское книжное издательство. p. 103.
  32. Rogava, G. V.; Kerasheva, Z. I. (1966). Грамматика адыгейского языка [Grammar of the Adyghe Language] (in Russian). Krasnodar, Maykop: Краснодарское книжное издательство. p. 105.
  33. 1 2 Kumakhov, M. A. (1989). Sravnitel'no-istoricheskaya grammatika adygskikh (cherkesskikh) yazykov [Comparative-historical grammar of the Adyghe (Circassian) languages]. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 218-220.
  34. 1 2 Matasović, Ranko (2010). A Short Grammar of Kabardian. Zagreb: University of Zagreb. p. 35.
  35. 1 2 Urys, H. Sh. (2001). Adyghe Grammatike: Fonetike, Morfonemike, Morfologie [Adyghe Grammar: Phonetics, Morphonemics, Morphology]. Nalchik: Elbrus.
  36. 1 2 Рогава Г. В., Керашева З. И. (1966). Грамматика адыгейского языка [Grammar of the Adyghe language]. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo.
  37. Kumakhov, M., & Vamling, K. Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö University, 2009. — p. 43.
  38. Kumakhov, M., & Vamling, K. Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö University, 2009. — p. 41, 48.
  39. Кумахов М. А. Морфология адыгских языков. Синхронно-диахронная характеристика. Москва—Нальчик, 1964. (From the section on the substantivization of verbal forms).
  40. Аркадьев П. М. и др. Основные сведения об адыгейском языке. Москва, 2009. — p. 58-59.
  41. Kumakhov, M., & Vamling, K. Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö University, 2009. — p. 49.
  42. Рогава Г. В., Керашева З. И. Грамматика адыгейского языка. Краснодар, 1966. — p. 215-222.
  43. Яковлев Н. Ф., Ашхамаф Д. А. Грамматика адыгейского литературного языка. М.-Л., 1941. — p. 173, 239, 314.
  44. Rogava, G. V.; Kerasheva, Z. I. (1966). Грамматика адыгейского языка [Grammar of the Adyghe language] (in Russian). Krasnodar: Krasnodar Book Publishing House. p. 181.
  45. Kumakhov, M.; Vamling, K. (2009). Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö University. p. 44.
  46. Yakovlev, N. F.; Ashkhamaf, D. A. (1941). Грамматика адыгейского литературного языка [Grammar of the Adyghe Literary Language] (in Russian). Moscow-Leningrad.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) as cited in Kumakhov, M. A. (1964). Морфология адыгских языков [Morphology of the Circassian Languages] (in Russian). Moscow-Nalchik. p. 21.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  47. Кумахов М. А. Морфология адыгских языков. Синхронно-диахронная характеристика. Москва—Нальчик, 1964. — p. 74-75.
  48. Кумахов М. А. Морфология адыгских языков. Синхронно-диахронная характеристика. Москва—Нальчик, 1964. — p. 24.
  49. Кумахов М. А. Морфология адыгских языков. Синхронно-диахронная характеристика. Москва—Нальчик, 1964. — p. 75.
  50. Кумахов М. А. Морфология адыгских языков. Синхронно-диахронная характеристика. Москва—Нальчик, 1964. (From the section on the substantivization of verbal forms).
  51. Рогава Г. В. К вопросу о структуре именных основ и категории грамматических классов в адыгских (черкесских) языках. Тбилиси, 1956. (As cited in Этимологический словарь адыгских языков, p. 30).
  52. Яковлев Н. Ф., Ашхамаф Д. А. Грамматика адыгейского литературного языка. М.-Л., 1941.
  53. Kumakhov, M., & Vamling, K. Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö University, 2009. — p. 155-156.
  54. Гишев Н. Т. Глаголы лабильной конструкции в адыгейском языке. Майкоп, 1968. — p. 30.
  55. Яковлев Н. Ф. Грамматика литературного кабардино-черкесского языка. М.-Л., 1948. (From the section discussing the centrifugal and centripetal meanings of vowel alternation).
  56. Яковлев Н. Ф., Ашхамаф Д. А. Грамматика адыгейского литературного языка. М.-Л., 1941.
  57. Яковлев Н. Ф., Ашхамаф Д. А. Грамматика адыгейского литературного языка. М.-Л., 1941. — p. 45.
  58. Kumakhov, M., & Vamling, K. Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö University, 2009. — p. 85-86.
  59. Kumakhov, Mukhadin; Vamling, Karina (2009). Circassian Clause Structure. Caucasus Studies 1. Malmö: Malmö University, pp. 97–98.
  60. Yakovlev, N.; Ashkhamaf, D. (1941). Грамматика адыгейского литературного языка [Grammar of the Adyghe Literary Language]. Moscow/Leningrad: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, pp. 51–52.
  • Урыс Хь. Ш. (2000). Адыгэбзэм и тхыдэ: ІыхьитIу зэхэлъу. Налшык: Эльбрус. ISBN 5-7680-1439-X
  • Nikolayev, Sergei L.; Starostin, Sergei A. (1994). A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary (Edited by S. A. Starostin). Moscow: Asterisk Publishers. Preface.
  • Chirikba, Viacheslav A. (1996). Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology. Leiden, The Netherlands: Research School CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS Publications, Vol. 48). ISBN 90-73782-73-2.
  • Kuipers, Aert Hendrik (1975). A Dictionary of Proto-Circassian Roots (PdR Press Publications on North Caucasian Languages 1). Lisse, Netherlands: The Peter de Ridder Press. PDF.