I still remember this one clearly.
I was working on a feature that needed two slightly different components. Naturally, I thought:
โHmmโฆ letโs be smart and make a reusable abstraction up front.โ
So I spent a few extra hours generalizing the logic, creating a โflexibleโ component that could handle any edge case I might encounter in the future.
It had flags. It had configuration. It had callbacks.
It was... beautifully abstracted.
๐ What Happened Next
A week later, requirements changed. The two components diverged. The flags grew. The logic tangled.
Suddenly, I was maintaining a monster that tried to do everythingโand pleased no one.
Instead of helping, my abstraction slowed me down. I ended up deleting the whole thing and rewriting each component separately. They were simpler. Easier to test. Easier to reason about.
๐คฏ What I Learned
Don't abstract until you have at least 3 real use cases.
Premature abstraction feels like a smart moveโbut often, itโs just guessing in the dark.
What looks โcleanโ today can turn into tech debt tomorrow.
๐ ๏ธ What I Do Differently Now
- I copy-paste more in the beginning (yep, you read that right).
- I wait until duplication hurts before abstracting.
- I treat abstraction as a response to repetition, not a prediction.
๐ฌ Real Talk
Sometimes "Don't Repeat Yourself" needs to take a backseat to "Keep It Simple".
If youโve ever built a generic framework for a problem that never scaledโhey, Iโve been there. And I promise, you're not alone. ๐
Top comments (0)