Sumitsurai

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sumitsurai!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 07:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Categories and please avoid "over-categorization"

Hi, as being tagged {categorize} see p.e. that one and some more files. Please also check Commons:categories and avoid "over-categorization". Best regards, Roland zh (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ফটোগ্রাফি কনটেস্ট-২০১৪-এ আপনি আমন্ত্রিত

সুধী, বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ার দশ বছর পূর্তি উদযাপনের অংশ হিসেবে কমন্সে বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ফটোগ্রাফি কনটেস্ট-২০১৪ শুরু হতে যাচ্ছে। এটি শুরু হবে ১লা সেপ্টেম্বর ২০১৪ তারিখে এবং শেষ হবে ৩১শে অক্টোবর ২০১৪ তারিখে। এই ফটোগ্রাফি প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশগ্রহনের জন্য আপনাকে আমন্ত্রন জানাচ্ছি।

Welcome to Wiki Loves Food (WLF) photo competition

Hi Sumitsurai,
Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is a public photo competition organized by Wikimedia India Chapter on Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation. The goal of this project is to improve the quality of pictures of different cuisines of India & the world. For more information regarding the Rules, Eligibility, Prize and other related issues, please visit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Food. The category for this photo competition is “Wiki Loves Food”. You can also visit our Facebook page here https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesFood?fref=ts.

The images for Phase I should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons during 15th April 2015 and 30th April 2015. It doesn’t matter when you have captured the photo, only that you upload it after 00:00 IST on 15th April 2015 and before the final deadline of 23:59 IST on 30th April 2015. Similarly for Phase II, The submission starts after 00.00 IST on 1st May 2015 and ends at 11.59 IST on 1ST June 2015.

Thank you,
The Wiki Loves Food Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lalji Temple - Kalna - Idol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - I give you weak support for promotion to QI for this one. There are focus problems in this photo, too, but I consider the idols themselves sufficiently in focus, and it's a good composition. However, I'd welcome for anyone who disagrees to take this to Consensual Review for a discussion and majority vote. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Mass deletions

Hello Sumitsurai,

for mass deletions like files from user:Stanley das794 please use Visual File Change. „It saves considerable time both for you and for the closing Admin“ (User:Jameslwoodward) --Hystrix (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot Hystrix for the suggestion. I will definitely check that and use in future. --Sumitsurai (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your quick reply. You can see a result here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Stanley_das794 --Hystrix (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
    • I am going through the js. Thanks again for the example. Will use it in future if needed. --Sumitsurai (talk) 19:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiki-voyage-header-omkareshwar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pancharantna Temple - Kalna - Temple 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gas Balloon at Jal Mahotsav - Hanuwantiya, Madhya Pradesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but please add proper categories. --Halavar 15:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Sorry! Have updated the relevant categories now. Thank you! --Sumitsurai 19:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Milseburg 13:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamondas Mookerjee Kalibari Capital Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chitteswari Temple Durga Idol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamondas Mookerjee Kalibari Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! River Narmada from Maheshwar Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Beautiful photo, but what are the blue streaks near the upper left corner? If you fix those, I'd seriously consider nominating this for FP, or you could. -- Ikan Kekek 11:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Thanks for pointing it out Ikan Kekek. I could locate two streaks, removed them and re uploaded the image. --Sumit Surai 18:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 00:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Descriptions at QIC

Hi there! It is great that you nominate photos by other users for QIC, but please do not include such long descriptions as you do on the nominations. I know that when you use the QIC nom tool, it copies the entire text from the file's description, but you have to replace that with a much shorter description in your own words. This can be done either in the small box you get when you click on the "Nominate this file for QI" or in the editing window when you have entered your nominations at QIC. Having the full description in the "frame" is not at all necessary since the reviewers read it on the file's page and we try not to clutter the page needlessly. All the best, --cart-Talk 18:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks cart for the advice. Yes, it was the default QIC nom tool structure that I was using. Will be editing it to the required minimum in the future. --Sumit Surai (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:River Narmada from Maheshwar Fort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:River Narmada from Maheshwar Fort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tingmo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC) - Hold it: Scope must be linked to a Commons category, so that any other photos in the scope (if there are any) can be compared to this one. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC) - Done. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted' ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aloo Chaat, Alu Kabli'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - You need to link your scope to a Commons category. Please have a look at how other nominations' scopes are structured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Thanks Ikan Kekek for pointing out the issue and suggesting an edit. I have added the category link in scope as required. Thanks. --Sumit Surai (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Thanks a lot. Since there are multiple types of aloo chaat, selecting one image as most useful in that category seems questionable. Should the scope of this nomination be contracted to Aloo Chaat, Alu Kabli? Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - You are right that there are multiple types of Aloo Chaat. Alu Kabli is one of them. But I chose the parent category as Alu Kabli till now have only one photo. Do you suggest I create a sub category, move the file there and nominate within that scope?--Sumit Surai (talk) 20:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

• No. I'm suggesting this for your scope: Aloo Chaat, Alu Kabli. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

• Done. Kindly check now. --Sumit Surai (talk) 06:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

• There's some code that didn't work, but  Support, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Durga Puja Kolkata Shobhabazar Sarbojonin (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise, but IMO just acceptable --A.Savin 16:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pancharatna Temple - Royal Quarters - Garh Panchakot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Sumitsurai, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kankali Mata Temple, Garh Panchakot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trail To Ramitey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You should give more location informations. --MirandaAdramin 13:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks MirandaAdramin. More details are in the photo details page. Didn't include all details here as was asked earlier to keep it short here. --Sumitsurai 07:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnathang Gadenchoeling Gumpa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Sixflashphoto 19:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dutch Cemetery Chinsurah - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Plain, but QI. --Crisco 1492 03:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dutch Cemetery Chinsurah - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a familiar street I've never been on.--RaboKarbakian 15:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goblet of Fire Cocktail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Striking and well-done, IMO, although the photo is small. -- Ikan Kekek 18:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grave of Elizabeth May, Dutch Cemetery, Chinsurah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dutch Cemetery Chinsurah - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 14:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality of this detail photo high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chharrah - Amlaka - I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment - The amalaka itself is OK, IMO, though the whites to its left might be blown. However, I don't think the photo is that useful without a file description. Could you please put a description on the "Description" line of your file page? -- Ikan Kekek 15:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)  Done Sorry, have added the description. --Sumitsurai 08:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Thanks.  Support - OK for me. -- Ikan Kekek 12:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chharrah - Amlaka - II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 12:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid - Prayer Hall (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid - Prayer Hall (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hafiz Jamaluddin Mosque - Mihrab (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me but it's a pity for the noise. Further, I would crop a bit of the left border to the arch centered and apply a slight horizontal correction to straighten the horizontal lines. --Basotxerri 17:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hafiz Jamaluddin Mosque - Mihrab (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok (due to noise) --Poco a poco 18:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you increase the exposure a bit? (ie at least File:Trougnouf's sandbox 2.jpg) --Trougnouf 22:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC) Uploaded with increased exposure. Could you please check? Thank you. --Sumitsurai 14:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thank you. --Trougnouf 15:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Iceland - a request

We have change the Time, the meeting is in August, 22.-25. The time to organise the money and event was too small, sorry. Can you support me at the conference program? Can you enter your name at the organisation team? --Ralf Roleček 17:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwich Cathedral West Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tudor Chimney.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Transept - Abbey of St. Edmund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christchurch Mansion - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 21:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christchurch Park War Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though 1/350s seems unnecessary for a static structure at 28mm, you could have gone with a slower shutter speed and lower ISO hence higher quality. --Trougnouf 22:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldest Building - Valley Farm - Flatford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwich Cathedral Spire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Sumitsurai,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haraktore - Stone idols preserved inside a temple (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 21:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broken Part Of Old Temple - Krosjuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damaged Idol Of Old Temple I - Krosjuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damaged Panels Of Old Temple - Krosjuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 12:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2018

Hallo Sumit Surai, thank you for the honour to propose me as a judge in the upcoming Wiki Loves Monuments, India 2018. I must tell you that I have no idea, what I have to do as judge, and also, how many time it will take. At the moment I still have a "normal" profession (next year in May I will be retired and I hope I will have more time for Wikimedia). Also my family needs some time. Working for Wikimedia is only a hobby. So I can't work every day for a certain time in Wikimedia, sometimes i must also pause for some days (so I can't bei online every day). Can you please inform me, what I have to do, how long it will last (only september?) and how much time I will need per day and if it is also possible to pause for one or severeal days? Sincerely --Llez (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Sumit Surai, I accept. It is a honour and a challenge for me. I never worked a judge and never with Montage, but I'm shure you will help me if there are questions (and I suppose there will be more than one). To a good cooperation. --Llez (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saanen Mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saanen Railway Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 15:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kirche Saanen Interior west wall and north wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be good to reduce the scope to what is actually shown here at west wall and north wall.
  •  Comment Archaeodontosaurus, have added west wall and north wall in the scope. Could you please check now? Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Tavel Door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows are too dark. Maybe you can fis that. --Ermell 06:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Ermell, have updated with new version. Could you please check if it is ok now? --Sumitsurai 11:19, 18 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3-5 Silent street, Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ipswich School.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saanen Church Fresco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Better than it could have been --Daniel Case 16:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greyfriars Bobby Memorial Fountain - Edinburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Congregational Church - Saltaire - Inside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ipswich School Library Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 14:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellbrunn Palace Statue I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness just over the bar --Poco a poco 17:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greyfriars Bobby Statue Edinburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Same as File:Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue I.jpg --Trougnouf 23:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I think a slight perspective correction to look like we are in front of the block would be a great improvement, but that's probably not expected for QI (which it is) --Trougnouf 23:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Congregational Church - Saltaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gippeswyk Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice that you got both the building and the sky right --Daniel Case 17:32, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Louvre Palace Pyramid.jpg

File:Louvre Palace Pyramid.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louvre Palace Pyramid.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 09:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosskapelle Blutenburg Frescoes II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre Palace Gallery Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 04:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre Palace North Gate Top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 23:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre Palace North Gate Top Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 23:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre Palace East Gate Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 23:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosskapelle Blutenburg Frescoes I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Statue's fine although some of the background looks a little dewy --Daniel Case 02:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Peter Ceiling - Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Neuf - Paris - France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jewish Memorial - Castle Blutenburg - Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre Dame - Paris - France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK. --Peulle 22:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main Door Panel - Asam Church - Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 18:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neptune's House and Amphitrite - Ercolano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak promotion. The sharpness/DoF could be better. f/3.5 is wide open, f/8 or closer would be better. --XRay 05:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre Palace East Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective issues (verticals) need to be fixed --Uoaei1 15:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)  Done--Paris 16 17:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:19, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Wolsey Bust - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! K6 Telephone Kiosk - St Helen Street - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden Panel At Listed Building - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Margaret's Church - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pompei Quadriportico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop or clone out that stray shadow at bottom center --Daniel Case 01:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC) Cloned out the shadow. Daniel Case could you please check if it is ok now? Thanks --Sumitsurai 15:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good now --Daniel Case 02:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 India - Third round

Hallo, Sumitsurai. in the last rounds it was very clear, what I had to do: select the images in the first round and then ranking them in the second round. When I open the third round, I find the images ranked from place 1 to place 58. They are seemingly already ranked. I have no idea what I have to do exactly in the third round and how? I found no instruction or a link to an instruction on the page. Greetings --Llez (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethseda Baptist Church - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Armillary Sphere Sundial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Thomas Wolsey - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodwork at old house - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically good, but I would prefer a tighter crop at the right, there is too much distracting background actually. May be you can crop left of the last car? Greetings --Dirtsc 07:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)  Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 14:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)  Done Could you please check if it is ok now Dirtsc? Thanks - --Sumitsurai 20:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)  Support This version is better balanced, QI imho. Greetings --Dirtsc 12:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christchurch Mansion Clock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gippeswyk Hall, Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Street Factory Marconi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marconi New Street Factory Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ipswich School WWI Memorial Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa dello Scheletro - Ercolano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Cecilia Stained Glass Felixstowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Not straight-on, but good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ethelbert King Kent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main object is sharp, well done grey sky, but please the object at the right crop --Michielverbeek 20:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabmans Shelter - Christchurch Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroness Burdett Coutts Drinking Fountain - North West View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Bridge Stone Alcove Inscription.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Bridge Stone Alcove At Victoria Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Bridge Stone Alcove - Victoria Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Seacole Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Aquatics Centre - Olympic Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chinese Pagoda - Victoria Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroness Burdett Coutts Drinking Fountain - South West View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark but good quality. --MB-one 10:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Seacole Statue - Side View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimea Site Disc Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You didn't have great light to work with but you did well. Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 09:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2019

Hallo Sumitsurai, thanks for the honour to be nominated again for the jury. I have only one problem in the moment: I am in holidays from Septeber 7 to September 22 and I don't know yet, if I will have the opportubity to go online. So it depends, when "Wiki Loves Monuments India 2019" begins. If it starts after September 22, I am pleased be in the jury again. --Llez (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you so much Llez for accepting our offer. Our jury rounds will open sometime during the first week of October. So it would not coincide with your holidays. Thanks again - --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Sumitsurai,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

---

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Hi Sumitsurai! You are receiving this message because you have previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in India. We would be very delighted if you would do so again this year, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes. You can find more details in this page. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019. Regards, Bodhisattwa (on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India team)--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8313 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salisbury Cathedral Nave - Ceiling Paintings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stonehenge from the north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good enough for QI but a jacket is visible on the right side of the photo, can you fix it?--Armenak Margarian 17:34, 18 September 2019 (UTC) The stones look greenish --Poco a poco 17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)  Done Thanks Armenak Margarian and Poco a poco. Have corrected as per suggestions. Is it ok now? --Sumitsurai 14:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Good for me--Armenak Margarian 17:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2019!

Hi

Thank you so much for contributing to the UK section of this year's Wiki Loves Monuments contest, which finished yesterday. We really do appreciate the time and effort you've put in to record the UK's built cultural heritage for future generations.

Your contribution has been been added to our collections here on Wikimedia Commons, and is already available for editors to make use of on Wikipedia and elsewhere. It has also been entered into this year's contest. If you'd like to see your own images, just click on the uploads link at the top right of this page (if you don't see it, click on the Log in option first).

We've received over 10,000 UK entries this year, and it will take a few weeks for our volunteers and professional judges to decide on the final top 10. The winners will be announced by the end of this month, both here on Wikimedia Commons and also on the competition website.

The top 10 UK images will go forward to the international section where they will compete against winners from some 50 other countries. The international winners should be announced here in December.

Don't forget, by the way, that if you're hoping to win a prize in the contest it's essential that you have enabled email in your Wikimedia preferences. If you haven't, you're not eligible to win. If you're unsure, please check here.

Once again, many thanks for your help! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salisbury Cathedral Spire - Wiltshire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 18:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 India - Jury Round

Hi, I finished the voting of the first round. Greetings --Llez (talk) 10:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. We would let you as know as soon as all the judges complete the round and we create the next. --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

I began to rank for the second round, but it was not possible to save the ranking made hitherto (Bad Request: must submit all rankings at once. (expected 117 submissions, got 100.) Is it possible to save after a while and then to continue, or must I do the rankig nonstop (i.e. to rank all), befor I can save it? It is not possible to me to do this without interrutpion for I must do it time by time (as in the first round). --Llez (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

PS. Every time I open the voting page, the pictures are arranged in another order.

Thanks for letting me know. Please do not try for the time being. It looks like Montage is unable to handle images more than 100 for ranking. I am checking and getting back to you as soon as possible. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Montage is not supporting more than 100 images for ranking, so I changed it to rating in this round. Really sorry that we would have to do a final ranking round after this. Do let me know if there are any other issues. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's College Chapel Reflection Cam River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inside King's College Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments null --IM3847 13:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Subject looks a little dark, but can be promoted --IM3847 13:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators.

--Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chappel Viaduct From Pub.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but categorization and description could are poor. Can you work on it a bit please? --Podzemnik 08:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)  Done --Sumitsurai 13:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Thank you --Podzemnik 17:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chappel Viaduct From Highway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but categorization and description could are poor. Can you work on it a bit please? --Podzemnik 08:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)  Done --Sumitsurai 13:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Thank you --Podzemnik 17:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chappel Viaduct And Highway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but categorization and description could are poor. Can you work on it a bit please? --Podzemnik 08:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)  Done --Sumitsurai 13:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Thank you --Podzemnik 17:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Sumitsurai,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Sumitsurai,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te

Wikimedia Italia

Gentile Sumitsurai,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché le tue foto sono usate in due o più voci di Wikipedia o di un altro progetto Wikimedia.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Sumitsurai,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 ­ India

Hello Sumitsurai!

From September 1 to September 30, 2020, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the tenth time. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year. You might remember this event as you had participated in one of the previous editions. We will be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes! You can find more details in this page.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2020

Hi Sumitsurai, thanks for the information. I'm pleased to be in the Jury again. When will it start? --Llez (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dubrovnik Old Town From Minčeta Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Lovrijenac - Dubrovnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Tower Top - Cathedral of Saint Domnius - Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Split Cathedral Bell Tower From The Vestibule - Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. And interesting image. --Argenberg 10:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. I've fixed the categories, please have a look --Podzemnik 06:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Tower Of Cathedral of Saint Domnius - Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Tower From Bottom - Cathedral of Saint Domnius - Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Request Both of your images need a better categorization --Moroder 05:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 18:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Sumitsurai,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Split Cathedral Bell Tower From The Vestibule - Split.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Split Cathedral Bell Tower From The Vestibule - Split.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 Slovenia

Slovenščina: Dragi Sumitsurai, hvala za tvoj prispevek za drugi natečaj Wiki Loves Monuments v Sloveniji! Žirija je ocenila prispele fotografije in ta torek, 8. decembra, bomo ob 18h razglasili zmagovalce. Priključiš se lahko temu namenjenemu Zoom srečanju in si ogledaš zmagovalne fotografije ter kratko predstavitev natečaja. Vabljen!

English: Dear Sumitsurai, thank you for participating in the second Wiki Loves Monuments competition in Slovenia! The jury has completed scoring the contributions and we will announce the winners this Tuesday, 8 December, at 18h. You're invited to tune in to the dedicated Zoom meeting at this time, to see the winning photographs and a short presentation of the competition (it will be in Slovene only). Best,

— Yerpo ^Eh? 17:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robba Fountain - Ljubljana II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Double Helix Staircase in Ljubljana Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality to my eyes, and a very enjoyable composition. -- Ikan Kekek 03:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robba Fountain - Ljubljana I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Food time!

Wiki Loves Food 2021 ­ India

Hello Sumitsurai!

Do you roam around in search of delicious mouth-watering foods and take photographs of them before you put them into your mouth? Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India photo-competition is then waiting for you! Participate in the competition from March 15 to April 14 this year, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes!

-- Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India team
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Lovrijenac In Dubrovnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Share Your Struggle 2021 - A public photo competition (15 - 31 August)

Share Your Struggle 2021 (15 - 31 August 2021) is a public photo competition on Wikimedia Commons. The goal of the project is to improve coverage of free usable media files related to various struggles, such as, natural disasters, health crises such as COVID-19 pandemic, social movements, conflict-torn areas, and any other humanitarian crises. The goal is not only to document crises, but also humanitarian efforts and acts of kindness that happen during such crises.

Submit photographs/videos and win prizes! Check the campaign page on Wikimedia Commons for more information to participate. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo Sumitsurai,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 ­ India

Hello Sumitsurai!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 12th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2021. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes! You can find more details about the Indian part of the competition in this page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Goblet of Fire Cocktail.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Goblet of Fire Cocktail.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 India

Hello Sumitsurai!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 13th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2022. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mysore Palace Windows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gumbaz - Srirangapatna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok for QI ! --Sebring12Hrs 14:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India 8th prize

Congratulations!!

Your photograph has won the 8th prize for Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India photographic competition. We have sent you an e-mail and requested you to provide necessary details, so that you can receive the declared national prize. Thanks for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments. Hope you will contribute more on Wikimedia Commons to build open knowledge for everyone in the planet! -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC) (on behalf of WLM 2022 India team)

Wiki Loves Food ends in less than a week. Hurry!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Food 2022 India

Hello Sumitsurai!

Wiki Loves Food photographic competition on Indian cuisine, which is happening from November 1 to November 30, 2022, ends in less than a week. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. If you are thinking about to participate again, now is the time!! We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes.

Click here to upload

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Food 2022 in India team)
sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bengaluru Fort Inside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aldeburgh beach - Scallop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bern - Swimming Bear - BärenPark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest - Carl Lutz Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment good image, but currently improperly categorized. --MB-one 19:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)  Done--Sumitsurai 20:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Sumitsurai,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parsi Mutton Berry Pulao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simon's Town - Boulder Beach Penguins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadleigh - 92 and 94 Benton Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DHR Sukna Station - Chimney.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lepcha Bong Gumpa Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stifone 16:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sillery Gaon - Rubus Ellipticus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful set of images. 01 and 02. --多多123 11:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC) If you use a flash next time and do a bit of focus stacking you can easily get FP. --多多123 11:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC) Thanks. Have not done focus stacking earlier. Will give it a try sometime soon :) Sumitsurai 20:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sillery Gaon - Rubus Ellipticus - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 11:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - Cleistocactus winteri - Golden Rat Tail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - Cleistocactus winteri - Golden Rat Tail 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - Cleistocactus winteri - Golden Rat Tail 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - Cleistocactus winteri - Golden Rat Tail 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - Cleistocactus winteri - Golden Rat Tail 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add some helpful categories. --Ermell 08:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)  Comment Category added now --Sumitsurai 10:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gouripur House - Kalimpong - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Luda.slominska 18:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs categories. --Ermell 08:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)  Comment Category added now --Sumitsurai 10:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 10:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 India

Hello Sumitsurai!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 14th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2023. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action soon!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine View Nursery - Cactus - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shahi Atala Masjid 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhutia Busty Monastery - Darjeeling - 17 - Prayer Flags.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhutia Busty Monastery - Darjeeling - 04 - Emblem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhutia Busty Monastery - Darjeeling - 33 - Guru Purnima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments too dark --Charlesjsharp 09:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC) Charlesjsharp, have increased exposure. Can you please check now? (the thumbnail here though is showing the old image. You will get the new one in the image page.) --Sumitsurai 12:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)  Support thanks --Charlesjsharp 10:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mag-Dhog Yolmowa Monastery - Alubari Monastery - Darjeeling - 14 - Decoration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhutia Busty Monastery - Darjeeling - 30 - Guru Purnima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhutia Busty Monastery - Darjeeling - 27 - Dungchen - Guru Purnima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qutb Shahi Tombs - Sultan Muhammad Qutb Shah Tomb From Hayat Bakshi Begum Tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mag-Dhog Yolmowa Monastery - Alubari Monastery - Darjeeling - 35 - Dragons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:46, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys

Hi! You have recently tried/used Wikimedia Commons features in OpenRefine (uploading files, or editing existing files). I'm curious to hear how this has gone, also if you only briefly tried these features.

To help the OpenRefine team with future improvements, it would be immensely helpful if you would be willing to spend a bit of time filling in two surveys. (Yes, two! Each of them uses a different method and (open source) platform). Both will run until approximately end October 2023.

1. A first, classical, survey (fully anonymous) where you can tell us how you use the Commons features in OpenRefine, and how you (want to) learn to use them better;
2. A second, more experimental survey (also fully anonymous) in which you prioritize the features that matter most to you. This second survey is a bit strange in that you can 'just keep clicking'. Feel free to use it as long or as briefly as you want; you can stop any time. Please also add your own suggestions!

Many thanks! With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 10:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Sumitsurai This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adsci8 (talk) 15:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mag-Dhog Yolmowa Monastery - Alubari Monastery - Darjeeling - 29 - Sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jay.Jarosz 20:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bimbisara Jail - Rajgir (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajatsatru Stupa - Rajgir - From South (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajatsatru Stupa - Rajgir - From North (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajatsatru Stupa - Rajgir - From East (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jain Shrine Ruins - Vaibhar Hills - Rajgir 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shell Characters Over Chariot Wheel Mark - Rajgir (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks --Imehling 16:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Bergholt - John Constable Studio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dedham Vale - River Stour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dundee - Desperate Dan Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rabindranath Tagore Plaque - Gouripur House - Kalimpong.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jain Shrine Ruins - Vaibhar Hills - Rajgir 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jain Shrine Ruins - Vaibhar Hills - Rajgir 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jain Shrine Ruins - Vaibhar Hills - Rajgir 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jain Shrine Ruins - Vaibhar Hills - Rajgir 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajatsatru Stupa - Rajgir - From South (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajatsatru Stupa - Rajgir - From North (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jain Shrine Ruins - Vaibhar Hills - Rajgir 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jain Shrine Ruins - Vaibhar Hills - Rajgir 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footpath From Sillery Gaon To Ramitey View Point 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blue fringes and not sure about the white balance (maybe a bit too blue?) --C messier 17:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)  CommentTried correcting both. Is it ok now? --Sumitsurai 02:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mag-Dhog Yolmowa Monastery - Alubari Monastery - Darjeeling - 34 - Dragons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noisy as well. Probably fixable --MB-one 16:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)  Oppose  Not done --MB-one 17:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)  CommentTried reducing noise. Is it ok now? -- Sumitsurai 02:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good now --MB-one 19:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Geden Tharpa Choeling Monastery - Kalimpong (64).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Geden Tharpa Choeling Monastery - Kalimpong (64).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 14:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Geden Tharpa Choeling Monastery - Kalimpong (49).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Geden Tharpa Choeling Monastery - Kalimpong (49).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 14:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Geden Tharpa Choeling Monastery - Kalimpong (51).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Geden Tharpa Choeling Monastery - Kalimpong (51).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 14:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery 1 - Granary - Nalanda Mahavihara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery 1 - Granary - Nalanda Mahavihara (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Votive Stupas - Nalanda Mahavihara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Stone Votive Stupa - Nalanda Mahavihara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Nalanda Mahavihara (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Nalanda Mahavihara (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Nalanda Mahavihara (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 3 - Sariputta Stupa - Brick Votive Stupas - Nalanda Mahavihara (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery 1 - Staircase Leading To Upper Monastery Cells - Nalanda Mahavihara (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Nalanda Mahavihara (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 14:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 3 - Sariputta Stupa - Stucco Works - Nalanda Mahavihara (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 3 - Sariputta Stupa - Brick Votive Stupas - Nalanda Mahavihara (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery 5 - Nalanda Mahavihara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a (very) faint dustspot in the sky at right to be removed. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 19:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Is it ok now? --Sumitsurai 09:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Thi 20:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 13 - Nalanda Mahavihara (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Nalanda Mahavihara (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 3 - Sariputta Stupa - Nalanda Mahavihara (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 12 - Nalanda Mahavihara (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery 1 - Staircase Leading To Upper Monastery Cells - Nalanda Mahavihara (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artefacts - Nalanda Museum - ASI NM G3 S4 - 12 - Buddha - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Useful to add a CAT "Statues of Buddha in ..." --Tagooty 15:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Thanks, added the category.--Sumitsurai 16:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terracotta Lotus Seal - Nalanda Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mould - Nalanda Museum (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 3 - Sariputta Stupa - Stucco Works - Nalanda Mahavihara (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery 1 - North Niche - Porch - Nalanda Mahavihara (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

I sent you an email

Hi, I've sent you an email, please check you inbox, thanks. --iMahesh (talk) 02:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sumit, please confirm when can we have the Jury call for Wiki Loves Vizag. Categorisation of images is almost done and they would be ready for review from 23rd of March 2023. --iMahesh (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, today is the last day to vote on Entries related to Construction, History and Transportation. Please check them if you haven't already, thanks. --iMahesh (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello Sumit, thanks for voting on Nature, History and Construction entries, also please complete the voting on Transportation and Miscellaneous related entries so they can move to the next round. --iMahesh (talk) 14:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mahesh, have completed voting on all the rounds. --Sumit Surai (talk) 02:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gajalakhsmi - Nalanda Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rishabhnath - Nalanda Museum - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is quite noisy and has borderline resolution anyway. It should be able to reduce the noise with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Plozessor, tried reducing the noise. Is it ok now? --Sumitsurai 14:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC) Noise is better, but it's quite dark, sorry, should have mentioned that before. Can you brighten it a bit? --Plozessor 15:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC) @Plozessor: , increased brightness. Could you please check again? --Sumitsurai 13:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Acceptable now, thx! --Plozessor 17:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Selection of winners for Wiki Loves Vizag

Hello @Sumitsurai, I'm delighted to inform you that we have completed the selection of finalists from 5 categories for the Wiki Loves Vizag contest. We have now commenced the process of finalizing the 3 winners from these outstanding images. Your participation is crucial in this selection process, which will be conducted in two rounds:

• Round 01: Rating the images (deadline: May 12, 2024)
• Round 02: Ranking the images (deadline: May 15, 2024)

Please check the montage tool for the campaign. If possible, we shall complete the process as early as possible iMahesh (talk) 12:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

@IM3847, completed round 1 - Sumit Surai (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for quick work. I have initiated Round 2 please check and rank, thanks. --iMahesh (talk) 07:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

@IM3847, done. - Sumit Surai (talk) 16:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Interior of the Reichstag dome This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Berlin - Interior of the Reichstag dome.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Results of Wiki Loves Vizag 2024 is out!

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Vizag 2024 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for the first edition of WLV. We saw over 1,400 images uploaded to Commons. Kindly see images here.

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated in this project.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Vizag Team

iMahesh (talk) 07:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Votive Stupas - Mahabodhi Temple Complex - Bodh Gaya (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahabodhi Temple South Wall (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be slightly sharper but still good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorative Panels on Votive Stupas - Mahabodhi Temple Complex (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Votive Stupas - Mahabodhi Temple Complex - Bodh Gaya (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background is a bit noisy. Otherwise good --MB-one 15:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC) Tried reducing background noise and uploaded a new version. Could you please check now, MB-one? --Sumitsurai 15:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurisarai Village Ruins (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahabodhi Temple South Wall (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be slightly sharper but still good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorative Panels on Votive Stupas - Mahabodhi Temple Complex (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Votive Stupas - Mahabodhi Temple Complex - Bodh Gaya (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background is a bit noisy. Otherwise good --MB-one 15:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC) Tried reducing background noise and uploaded a new version. Could you please check now, MB-one? --Sumitsurai 15:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurisarai Village Ruins (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurisarai Village Rock Carvings 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Glasgow - Mural Ingram Street.jpg

File:Glasgow - Mural Ingram Street.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glasgow - Mural Ingram Street.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurisarai Village Rock Carvings 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurisarai Village Rock Carvings 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurisarai Village Rock Carvings 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Useful to add CAT:Sculptures in ... --Tagooty 03:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Qutb Minar with Neem Tree.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Qutb Minar with Neem Tree.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Makhdum Shah Daulat and Ibrahim Khan - Maner - Main Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Shaikh Salim Chishti Ka Maqbara.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shaikh Salim Chishti Ka Maqbara.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Ukraine 2024: thank you for your help!

Dear Sumitsurai,

We are very grateful for your help with pre-selecting photos for our edition of Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 - it allowed us to meet the deadline of the International team, and submit the winning pictures of our competition to the International Jury.

We are still wrapping up things on our end, so we would be able to send the souvenirs and certificates of gratitude only some time in January. Sorry about this delay, but we hope this unique barnstar can serve as a virtual thank you note meanwhile!

Thanks and take care!

On behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments Ukraine organising team --アンタナナ 20:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

@アンタナナ, happy to do it. Thanks for the barnstar. --Sumit Surai (talk) 10:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

File:RØDE Wireless Go II Dual Channel.jpg

File:RØDE Wireless Go II Dual Channel.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:RØDE Wireless Go II Dual Channel.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 12:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Chandranath Shib Temple Front Side Right Panel06 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Chandranath Shib Temple Front Side Left Panel06 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:30, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Chandranath Shib Temple Front Side Left Panel07 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Chandranath Shib Temple Front Side Right Panel07 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:01, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Right Column02 Left Panel08 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Right Column02 Left Panel09 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Right Column02 Left Panel10 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Right Column02 Left Panel11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Right Doortop 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Front Column01 Right Panel05 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Front Column01 Right Panel05 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front Doortop Right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:42, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front Pillar Left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Geodata would be nice too --Grunpfnul 16:05, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Top Panels 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:06, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front Right Pillar Base.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Geo location missing, categories missing. Please add useful categories. --XRay 11:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC) Added both. Could you please check now? Thanks. --Sumitsurai 12:28, 14 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 15:42, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Top Right 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:57, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple TopArch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple TopArch 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:13, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetampur Dewanji Temple Right Doortop Row02 Panel02 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:56, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front Door Left DoorTop 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front OuterRight Pillar Base 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:27, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front PillarTop02 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:06, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Left Vertical03 Panel0708 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Left Vertical03 Panel0607 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Right Side Panel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Top Left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Top Right 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:59, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front PillarTop01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at 11 October 2025, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha Lakkhi Janardan Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front Left Col03 Row16 Panel01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front Left Col03 Row15-16 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front Left Col03 Row10 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front Left Col03 Row09 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front BasePattern01 Left 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front Door Centre DoorTop Panel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front BaseRow01 Panel04 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture but unfortunately tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 19:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC) @AFBorchert: , have corrected the tilt. Could you please check now? Thanks. --Sumitsurai 09:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Thanks for fixing. Good quality. --AFBorchert 17:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front LeftCol03 Row17 Panel02 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:11, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghurisha LakkhiJanardan Front Pillar01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:51, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siuri Damodar Temple Front 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not the best sharpness, but acceptable IMO --Екатерина Борисова 23:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Join the first national Wiki Science Competition 2025 in India from 1 Nov to 15 Dec

Hello Sumitsurai!,

You are receiving this message as you have previously participated in one of the Wiki Loves X campaigns or are an active Wikimedia Commons contributor.

We’re excited to announce that the Wiki Science Competition 2025 in India is being organized for the very first time at a national level. This global campaign celebrates science through freely licensed images, videos, and other media on Wikimedia Commons. By participating, you help make science more visible, accessible, and inspiring to people everywhere.

The competition features eight exciting categories:

1. People in Science
2. Microscopy
3. Astronomy
4. Everyday Science
5. Scientific Equipment
6. Chemistry
7. Physics
8. Special Category

Campaign Duration: The competition will run from 1 November to 15 December 2025. You can upload your images anytime during this period.

Images taken before 1 November 2025 are also eligible, as long as they have never been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons before.

We’re excited to introduce the first-ever dedicated "Mobile Photography" participation option. Now, you can upload photographs taken with your mobile phone directly through a special upload wizard.

This new option is designed to encourage students and individuals who may not have access to high-end cameras like DSLRs to participate. Whether your images are captured using a mobile phone or a professional DSLR, all submissions will be judged equally within the relevant category. This ensures that everyone has an equal opportunity to capture and share the wonders of science from their own perspective.

Please visit the official pages for more details:

• Commons page: Wiki Science Competition 2025 in India
• Website: wikisciencecompetition.in
• Participating countries: Wiki Science Competition 2025

We look forward to your participation and support in making this national campaign a great success. It’s your chance to participate, get recognized, and show how science looks through your lens!. Thank you.

-- Suyash Dwivedi (💬) 10:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

On behalf of Wiki Science Competition, India 2025 organizing team

Wiki Science Competition 2025 in Switzerland

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland, Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Switzerland , we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2025 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in Swiss WSC2025, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category by simply adding the national category (even if not uploaded with the main interface).

If you take part, please consider to provide a complete description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2026.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2025 #WikiScience #WikiScience2025

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--21:28, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autumn Leaves - Caversham Court - Reading.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:27, 5 December 2025 (UTC) The categorization should be better. Categories for location are missing. --XRay 10:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Merry Christmas & Happy New Year 2026!

Dear Sumit Surai! Warmest wishes for a joyful holiday season and prosperous 2026. 🎄🎉 -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 13:33, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. A Happy Christmas and a joy filled 2026 to you too. Sumit Surai (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Hackathon Northwestern Europe 2026

Hello! I came across your name on a previous Wikimedia hackathon participant page, so I thought you might be interested in this.

We're organizing the Wikimedia Hackathon Northwestern Europe 2026, taking place on 13–14 March 2026 in Arnhem, the Netherlands. It's a two-day, in-person hackathon for technical Wikimedians from the region.

Since you've attended a hackathon before, you already know how valuable these events can be for collaboration, learning, and getting things done together. We'd love to have you join us!

Apply here – registration closes mid-January or when full.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. Hope to see you in Arnhem! Daanvr (talk) 14:57, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pratapeshwar Temple - Kalna Rajbari Complex - Terracotta Panels - Front - Left of Door - Bottom - Panel 04 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:10, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pratapeshwar Temple - Kalna Rajbari Complex 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:45, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pratapeshwar Temple - Kalna Rajbari Complex - Terracotta Panels - Front - Left of Door - Bottom - Panel 01 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:46, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pratapeshwar Temple - Kalna Rajbari Complex - Terracotta Panels - Front - Left of Door - Bottom - Panel 03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:11, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pratapeshwar Temple - Kalna Rajbari Complex - Terracotta Panels - Front - Left of Door - Bottom - Panel 02 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:00, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 18 April 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at 2 May 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

• First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area.
  Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
• Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia.
  Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
• Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers.
  Attribution: public domain

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:02, 9 May 2026 (UTC)