Sous Vide Corned Beef
May. 29th, 2026 11:29 pmMay Family Visit Travelog #18
At my inlaws' house · Fri 29 May 2026. 10am.
This one's actually from last week, but I put it off/forgot about it until now. I did sous vide cooking for the first time. It was in my mother-in-law's (MIL's) kitchen, with her equipment and her guidance, while she's not well enough to do the cooking herself. It was fairly easy, and the results were— to my surprise— fairly good.

Sous vide, for the one or two people who still don't know at this point, is a method of cooking wherein food is slowly cooked in a water bath. The name in French literally means under vacuum, referring to the fact that the food is sealed in a plastic bag with the air pressed out of it to help with the cooking. In the picture above you see a large plastic container, filled with water; the meat, placed in a Zip-lok bag, and the heater, set to keep the water at a constant 68.5° C (155° F) while cooking.
How slow is "slow"? In the case of this corned beef, which traditionally would be cooked by boiling in a pot (how my Irish-American grandmother always made it) or in a roasting pan for 3-4 hours, we cooked it sous vide for a whopping 29 hours. TBH I'm not sure where that cooking time came from. MIL stated it as she guided me on how to set up the rig. It's certainly not marked on the meat's packaging. The water temperature of 155° F (68.5° C) came from instructions included with the device.

The results were good. I mean, we had to plan ahead and start cooking more than a full day before we wanted to eat. And MIL wanted her corned beef sliced sandwich-thin, which meant we had to plan for it to be done cooking a few hours before dinner so that we could refrigerate it to slice it thin enough. I sliced a portion thin enough for her to have two meals of it (she's eating very little right now) then sliced the rest in larger chunks and reheated it to serve in a more traditional style.

How were the results? They were delicious. And that (pleasantly) surprised me. Why? It was surprising because, frankly, virtually everyone I know who praises sous vide food routinely overcooks it, badly.
I still remember the first time I encountered sous vide, probably 20 years ago now. A friend was rhapsodizing about how tender the meats are and how it's impossible to overcook them. He was signing these praises while offering us all pieces of a steak he'd cooked— a steak he'd cooked until it was gray through-and-through and tasted like shoe leather. Everyone around me agreed with the chef. The steak was delicious and tender, they all nodded, adding their effusive praises to the chef's self-congratulatory back-patting. Chewing over and over on a tasteless slice of meat I felt like a subject in that psychological experiment about peer pressure where everyone else in the room agrees that object A is bigger than object B, when it's objectively true— and clearly visible— that B is bigger than A
And it wasn't just that one bad experience I've had with sous vide. A relative of mine brags constantly about cooking meats sous vide. He goes on about it like vegans crowing about veganism. He considers himself a pro-quality chef of the style and has looked at creating a business around it, doing catering for parties. Reader, I've eaten his food, and it's so overcooked that if I were served it at a restaurant I would send it back. I would send it back and then, after the chef came out to berate me for clearly not appreciating beautiful, perfectly cooked food, never eat at that restaurant again.
So, given my experience that sous vide is more of a freakin' cult than a valid means of cooking food, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that good results can be achieved just as easily as shoe leather. Now I'd actually consider buying one of these rigs for my own kitchen.
At my inlaws' house · Fri 29 May 2026. 10am.
This one's actually from last week, but I put it off/forgot about it until now. I did sous vide cooking for the first time. It was in my mother-in-law's (MIL's) kitchen, with her equipment and her guidance, while she's not well enough to do the cooking herself. It was fairly easy, and the results were— to my surprise— fairly good.

Sous vide, for the one or two people who still don't know at this point, is a method of cooking wherein food is slowly cooked in a water bath. The name in French literally means under vacuum, referring to the fact that the food is sealed in a plastic bag with the air pressed out of it to help with the cooking. In the picture above you see a large plastic container, filled with water; the meat, placed in a Zip-lok bag, and the heater, set to keep the water at a constant 68.5° C (155° F) while cooking.
How slow is "slow"? In the case of this corned beef, which traditionally would be cooked by boiling in a pot (how my Irish-American grandmother always made it) or in a roasting pan for 3-4 hours, we cooked it sous vide for a whopping 29 hours. TBH I'm not sure where that cooking time came from. MIL stated it as she guided me on how to set up the rig. It's certainly not marked on the meat's packaging. The water temperature of 155° F (68.5° C) came from instructions included with the device.

The results were good. I mean, we had to plan ahead and start cooking more than a full day before we wanted to eat. And MIL wanted her corned beef sliced sandwich-thin, which meant we had to plan for it to be done cooking a few hours before dinner so that we could refrigerate it to slice it thin enough. I sliced a portion thin enough for her to have two meals of it (she's eating very little right now) then sliced the rest in larger chunks and reheated it to serve in a more traditional style.

How were the results? They were delicious. And that (pleasantly) surprised me. Why? It was surprising because, frankly, virtually everyone I know who praises sous vide food routinely overcooks it, badly.
I still remember the first time I encountered sous vide, probably 20 years ago now. A friend was rhapsodizing about how tender the meats are and how it's impossible to overcook them. He was signing these praises while offering us all pieces of a steak he'd cooked— a steak he'd cooked until it was gray through-and-through and tasted like shoe leather. Everyone around me agreed with the chef. The steak was delicious and tender, they all nodded, adding their effusive praises to the chef's self-congratulatory back-patting. Chewing over and over on a tasteless slice of meat I felt like a subject in that psychological experiment about peer pressure where everyone else in the room agrees that object A is bigger than object B, when it's objectively true— and clearly visible— that B is bigger than A
And it wasn't just that one bad experience I've had with sous vide. A relative of mine brags constantly about cooking meats sous vide. He goes on about it like vegans crowing about veganism. He considers himself a pro-quality chef of the style and has looked at creating a business around it, doing catering for parties. Reader, I've eaten his food, and it's so overcooked that if I were served it at a restaurant I would send it back. I would send it back and then, after the chef came out to berate me for clearly not appreciating beautiful, perfectly cooked food, never eat at that restaurant again.
So, given my experience that sous vide is more of a freakin' cult than a valid means of cooking food, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that good results can be achieved just as easily as shoe leather. Now I'd actually consider buying one of these rigs for my own kitchen.
























