Ok, looking for a bit of perspective here. Well, perhaps different perspectives might be more accurate.
This begins in my last journal entry (which I cross posted onto http://community.livejournal.com/unnaturalpagans/profile ). Check it there to follow some of the comments,
( or read the basic post here.Collapse ) So, that established, I'm wanting to bounce ideas around here as well.
At the very first of it, let me reiterate that while I am wanting to address this issue in a workshop, I do fully understand that this, like any other bit of shadow work/counseling, will merely be the first steps in a much longer process. I'm just wanting to get the ball rolling by addressing a subject that is mostly ignored or minimized in most "pagan" publications and groups.
Then there's the issue of needing to clarify the differences between "intentional" and accidental murder, and possibly the need to separate them as completely different beasts despite the emotional and spiritual similarities. Intentional murder covering everything from a soldier at war, or a cop in the line of duty, to extremes in defending home, friends or family from harm. Accidental would (I think) be split into 2 further categories: Blame and Blameless. Blame accidents would be such things as DUI related accidents, playing around with loaded guns, intentionally shorting or ignoring safety precautions in dangerous environs (ie construction). Blameless accidents would cover such things as weather related traffic accidents, or even when a doctor or medic fails to save a life. True, all of these situations carry different implications when confronted with ethics systems based on "Life is Sacred", but it could be argued that the mental and emotional (and spiritual) turmoil, let alone the relevant dichotomies, are similar enough to each other as to make no difference.
I've gotten a number of responses ranging from completely worthless to the thought provoking. That's where y'all come in. Different perspectives both to the originating philosophical dichotomy in relation to the life changing event, as well as how to begin the counselors process of significantly reconciling the two.
It's been suggested that perhaps the
Baghavad Gita would cover these. The problem there is in the significant cultural and philosophical differences with our modern society. I can see that to some extent the idea the concepts of the old caste system and specific dharma guiding peoples lives could be said to overlap in a sense with modern society. Mind you, the similarity is mainly evident if you consider different times/phases of life as equating to specific castes. For example, Little Johnny graduates high school and becomes a marine who gets shipped off to war. After some time of service, Johnny gets out of the Marines, goes to college, and eventually becomes medical doctor. If you consider each phase of Johnny's life (Soldier, Scholar, Doctor) as a separate "caste" with it's own specific dharma. It is the next stage in the equation that really doesn't fit, however. The
Gita would maintain that each dharma should be carried out with full zeal and without emotional ties, for one is simply obeying the natural order of their position. Yet, in modern society, we tend to have certain "moral presets", regardless of our individual ethics, well established before we ever get near the time we choose career or temporary profession.
For some reason, I thinking there is a correlation there to the end result of counseling I am seeking to create...but it is eluding me currently. So, I turn here for some more analytical ideas, as well as some that might take a completely different tact.
All assistance here is greatly appreciated.
Chris / Grynner
That Memphis Guy