181

Is it possible to declare a method that will allow a variable number of parameters ?

What is the symbolism used in the definition that indicate that the method should allow a variable number of parameters?

Answer: varargs

1
  • 13
    Since its homework, we don't want to know your question, we just want to know you are learning. Commented Nov 18, 2013 at 17:19

6 Answers 6

316

That's correct. You can find more about it in the Oracle guide on varargs.

Here's an example:

void foo(String... args) {
    for (String arg : args) {
        System.out.println(arg);
    }
}

which can be called as

foo("foo"); // Single arg.
foo("foo", "bar"); // Multiple args.
foo("foo", "bar", "lol"); // Don't matter how many!
foo(new String[] { "foo", "bar" }); // Arrays are also accepted.
foo(); // And even no args.
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

6 Comments

Is it possible to do various type of paramteres? e.g. (String...strs, int... ints). What about just any type of argument in any order?
@trusktr: if you want any object, just use Object....
@trusktr No, primitives are not objects. There is a great explanation of the difference here: programmerinterview.com/index.php/java-questions/…
@Richard: Using Object... args will work with primitives because of autoboxing.
@StevenVascellaro : I assume that the arguments are handled like an array, so you could probably simply do varargs.length
|
18
Variable number of arguments

It is possible to pass a variable number of arguments to a method. However, there are some restrictions:

  • The variable number of parameters must all be the same type
  • They are treated as an array within the method
  • They must be the last parameter of the method

To understand these restrictions, consider the method, in the following code snippet, used to return the largest integer in a list of integers:

private static int largest(int... numbers) {
     int currentLargest = numbers[0];
     for (int number : numbers) {
        if (number > currentLargest) {
            currentLargest = number;
        }
     }
     return currentLargest;
}

source Oracle Certified Associate Java SE 7 Programmer Study Guide 2012

Comments

18

Yes, it's possible:

public void myMethod(int... numbers) { /* your code */ }

1 Comment

not precised enough to understand
14

For different types of arguments, there is 3-dots :

public void foo(Object... x) {
    String myVar1  = x.length > 0 ? (String)x[0]  : "Hello";
    int myVar2     = x.length > 1 ? Integer.parseInt((String) x[1]) : 888;
} 

Then call it

foo("Hii"); 
foo("Hii", 146); 

for security, use like this:
if (!(x[0] instanceof String)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("..."); }

The main drawback of this approach is that if optional parameters are of different types you lose static type checking. Please, see more variations .

Comments

6

Yup...since Java 5: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/language/varargs.html

Comments

0

Yes Java allows vargs in method parameter .

public class  Varargs
{
   public int add(int... numbers)
   { 
      int result = 1; 
      for(int number: numbers)
      {
         result= result+number;  
      }  return result; 
   }
}

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.