627

I have an array of integers.

For example:

array = [123,321,12389]

Is there any nice way to get the sum of them?

I know, that

sum = 0
array.each { |a| sum+=a }

would work.

5
  • 41
    Please note that Ruby 2.4+ has array.sum Commented Jul 3, 2017 at 18:58
  • 1
    Ruby 2.6 does not have it. Ruby giveth, Ruby taketh away, it seems. Commented Jan 22, 2019 at 20:38
  • 2
    @Lori hmm ? link Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 15:22
  • 2
    Sorry. At that time I mistakenly believed I was using 2.6 because of a rbenv slip-up on my part. Commented Jun 27, 2019 at 0:15
  • If you need to supply a default value for when the Array is empty, like if you want to return a Money object instead of an Integer, you can do something like array.sum( 0.to_money( "USD" ) ). Commented Mar 5, 2021 at 16:05

16 Answers 16

863

For ruby >= 2.4 you can use sum:

array.sum

For ruby < 2.4 you can use inject:

array.inject(0, :+)

Note: the 0 base case is needed otherwise nil will be returned on empty arrays:

> [].inject(:+)
nil
> [].inject(0, :+)
0
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

9 Comments

How can I use this way to sum a attribute from object. My array [product1, product2] I want to sum product1.price + product2.price. Is it possible using array.inject(:+)?
You can use a similar trick with the map method: array.map(&:price).inject(:+)
array.map(&:price).inject(0, :+) is a bit safer. It makes sure that if you have an empty list you get 0 instead of nil.
using array.map(...).inject(...) is inefficient, you will iterate through all data twice. Try array.inject(0) { |sum, product| sum += product.price }
@everett1992 and as it turns out, not even an optimisation at all. Doing it in two stages is consistently faster for me. gist.github.com/cameron-martin/b907ec43a9d8b9303bdc
|
648

Try this:

array.inject(0){ |sum, x| sum + x }

See Ruby's Enumerable Documentation

(note: the 0 base case is needed so that 0 will be returned on an empty array instead of nil)

5 Comments

jorney's array.inject(:+) is more efficient.
array.inject(:+) seems to cause trouble in Ruby 1.8.6 Exceptions " LocalJumpError : no block given" might pop up.
In rails array.sum might give you sum of the array values.
In most cases, I prefer to use reduce, which is an alias of inject (as in array.reduce( :+ )).
@Boris Also, Rubycop will warn you for using inject rather than reduce.
304
array.reduce(0, :+)

While equivalent to array.inject(0, :+), the term reduce is entering a more common vernacular with the rise of MapReduce programming models.

inject, reduce, fold, accumulate, and compress are all synonymous as a class of folding functions. I find consistency across your code base most important, but since various communities tend to prefer one word over another, it’s nonetheless useful to know the alternatives.

To emphasize the map-reduce verbiage, here’s a version that is a little bit more forgiving on what ends up in that array.

array.map(&:to_i).reduce(0, :+)

Some additional relevant reading:

3 Comments

I agree, reduce tells me more of what the function does, but inject does sound much cooler.
The one comment I would make is that reduce and map as higher-order functions predate MapReduce. The inspiration runs the other way. And in the MapReduce sense, it's a somewhat different operation than a simple functional reduce, having implications for how different machines communicate.
Ken Iverson introduced the operator / called "reduction operator" in the programming language APL. Source: Iverson, Kenneth. 1962. A Programming Language. Wiley. Another source: "Notation as a Tool of Thought", 1979 ACM Turing Award Lecture, Kenneth E. Iverson, dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1283935&type=pdf
118

Alternatively (just for comparison), if you have Rails installed (actually just ActiveSupport):

require 'activesupport'
array.sum

3 Comments

Newer versions of activesupport don't actually load all extensions by default. You'll want to either require just the sum module: require 'active_support/core_ext/enumerable.rb', or require all of active support: require 'active_support/all'. More about it here: API Docs
Never mind that activesupport is a massive dependency to drag into a project to go from array.inject(:+) to array.sum.
Nitpick to an otherwise good comment: it should be require 'active_support/core_ext/enumerable' without the .rb suffix, since that's added implicitly.
97

For Ruby >=2.4.0 you can use sum from Enumerables.

[1, 2, 3, 4].sum

It is dangerous to mokeypatch base classes. If you like danger and using an older version of Ruby, you could add #sum to the Array class:

class Array
  def sum
    inject(0) { |sum, x| sum + x }
  end
end

4 Comments

Monkeypatching base classes is not nice.
The point he is making is that you don't need to do the Monkey Patch for Ruby >= 2.4, and that monkey patching is dangerous, and that you can now sum enumerables natively, but there is also a way to backport the functionality.
As noted, Enumerable#sum (and Array#sum) were introduced in Ruby v2.4. Importantly, they do not have the same behavior as your Array#sum; namely, they take an optional argument and an optional block. Defining Array#sum as you have would result in an exception being raised wherever sum appeared in the code with an argument or block.
If you need to supply a default value for when the Array is empty, like if you want to return a Money object instead of an Integer, you can do something like array.sum( 0.to_money( "USD" ) ).
51

New for Ruby 2.4.0

You can use the aptly named method Enumerable#sum. It has a lot of advantages over inject(:+) but there are some important notes to read at the end as well.

Examples

Ranges

(1..100).sum
#=> 5050

Arrays

[1, 2, 4, 9, 2, 3].sum
#=> 21

[1.9, 6.3, 20.3, 49.2].sum
#=> 77.7

Important note

This method is not equivalent to #inject(:+). For example

%w(a b c).inject(:+)
#=> "abc"
%w(a b c).sum
#=> TypeError: String can't be coerced into Integer

Also,

(1..1000000000).sum
#=> 500000000500000000 (execution time: less than 1s)
(1..1000000000).inject(:+)
#=> 500000000500000000 (execution time: upwards of a minute)

See this answer for more information on why sum is like this.

3 Comments

If you need to supply a default value for when the Array is empty, like if you want to return a Money object instead of an Integer, you can do something like array.sum( 0.to_money( "USD" ) ).
This answer is deprecated. In ruby2.6.6 for example, you can do %w(a b c).sum # => "abc"
Note that if you are doing math, an Array of Float or BigDecimal called by .sum will convert them back to Integer, breaking your math! You need to call foo.sum.to_f to preserve the Float.
22

Ruby 2.4+ / Rails - array.sum i.e. [1, 2, 3].sum # => 6

Ruby pre 2.4 - array.inject(:+) or array.reduce(:+)

*Note: The #sum method is a new addition to 2.4 for enumerable so you will now be able to use array.sum in pure ruby, not just Rails.

Comments

19

Just for the sake of diversity, you can also do this if your array is not an array of numbers, but rather an array of objects that have properties that are numbers (e.g. amount):

array.inject(0){|sum,x| sum + x.amount}

4 Comments

This is equivalent to doing: array.map(&:amount).inject(0, :+). See other answers.
In a way, yes. However, using map then inject requires you to loop through the array twice: once to create a new array, the other to sum the members. This method is slightly more verbose, but also more efficient.
Apparently it is not more efficient, see gist.github.com/cameron-martin/b907ec43a9d8b9303bdc - credit to the comments in this answer: stackoverflow.com/a/1538949/1028679
@RichardJones or just array.sum(&:amount) as of today (using ruby >= 2.4 or rails).
18

ruby 1.8.7 way is the following:

array.inject(0, &:+) 

1 Comment

If you read my 2011 comment, and it's still relevant as you're using 1.8.6, please upgrade!
6

Ruby 2.4.0 is released, and it has an Enumerable#sum method. So you can do

array.sum

Examples from the docs:

{ 1 => 10, 2 => 20 }.sum {|k, v| k * v }  #=> 50
(1..10).sum                               #=> 55
(1..10).sum {|v| v * 2 }                  #=> 110

Comments

4

Also allows for [1,2].sum{|x| x * 2 } == 6:

# http://madeofcode.com/posts/74-ruby-core-extension-array-sum
class Array
  def sum(method = nil, &block)
    if block_given?
      raise ArgumentError, "You cannot pass a block and a method!" if method
      inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + yield(i) }
    elsif method
      inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + i.send(method) }
    else
      inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + i }
    end
  end
end

Comments

4

for array with nil values we can do compact and then inject the sum ex-

a = [1,2,3,4,5,12,23.45,nil,23,nil]
puts a.compact.inject(:+)

Comments

2

Method 1:

    [1] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4].sum
    => 10
    [2] pry(main)> [].sum
    => 0
    [3] pry(main)> [1,2,3,5,nil].sum
    TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer

Method 2:

   [24] pry(main)> [].inject(:+)
   => nil
   [25] pry(main)> [].inject(0, :+)
   => 0
   [4] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4,5].inject(0, :+)
   => 15
   [5] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4,nil].inject(0, :+)
   TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer
   from (pry):5:in `+'

Method 3:

   [6] pry(main)> [1,2,3].reduce(:+)
   => 6
   [9] pry(main)> [].reduce(:+)
   => nil
   [7] pry(main)> [1,2,nil].reduce(:+)
   TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer
   from (pry):7:in `+'

Method 4: When Array contains an nil and empty values, by default if you use any above functions reduce, sum, inject everything will through the

TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer

You can overcome this by,

   [16] pry(main)> sum = 0 
   => 0
   [17] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4,nil, ''].each{|a| sum+= a.to_i }
   => [1, 2, 3, 4, nil, ""]
   [18] pry(main)> sum
   => 10

Method 6: eval

Evaluates the Ruby expression(s) in string.

  [26] pry(main)> a = [1,3,4,5]
  => [1, 3, 4, 5]
  [27] pry(main)> eval a.join '+'
  => 13
  [30] pry(main)> a = [1,3,4,5, nil]
  => [1, 3, 4, 5, nil]
  [31] pry(main)> eval a.join '+'
  SyntaxError: (eval):1: syntax error, unexpected end-of-input
  1+3+4+5+

1 Comment

reduce and inject are literally the same thing. If you really want to build an object by yourself, you should consider each_with_object instead of each (Method 4). Suggestion: [1,2,3,4,nil, ''].each_with_object(0) {|a| sum+= a.to_i }
1

If you feel golfy, you can do

eval [123,321,12389]*?+

This will create a string "123+321+12389" and then use function eval to do the sum. This is only for golfing purpose, you should not use it in proper code.

Comments

-1

You can also do it in easy way

def sum(numbers)
  return 0 if numbers.length < 1
  result = 0
  numbers.each { |num| result += num }
  result
end

1 Comment

This is very non-idiomatic Ruby, it looks like Ruby written by a C programmer. In Ruby, inject or sum are preferred.
-10

You can use .map and .sum like:

array.map { |e| e }.sum

1 Comment

What is the point of do a map returning same element? this is exactly the same than array.sum

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.