2
\$\begingroup\$

My situation: I have a 16x antenna phased array with each antenna connected to its own receiver pre-amplification circuit that I have custom made. Since the system is a phased array, the phase shift of each circuit (or electrical path length) must be as identical as possible to ensure we know what direction signals are arriving to the array. Since these circuits are hand made by me, and are fairly complex, there is a bit of fluctuation in the phase shift across all 16 circuits. My goal is to eliminate this phase shift between the individual circuits, so all circuits have identical electrical path length.

I have collected magnitude and phase measurements on my current batch of circuits using a VNA across our working frequencies (8-20 MHz), shown below.

  • Plot 1: Amplification of each circuit (not applicable here)
  • Plot 2: The phase shift of each circuit from input to output of the circuit
  • Plot 3: The variation in magnitude and phase across all circuits

Magnitude/phase/variation plot of VNA data collected on my circuits

From the plot, I can see that the phase variation is pretty close (all within ~5 degrees of each other) - but can I do better?

My question: Is it possible to manually adjust the electrical path length of an RF circuit (i.e. with something like a potentiometer trimmer) so that I could adjust the phase and calibrate all of my circuits to have the exact same phase characteristics?

I'm relatively new to RF circuit design, so this may be a naive question. I just want to figure out if this is possible before I move ahead with my design.

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ What sort of problem does a variation of 5 degrees cause? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 11 at 23:28
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I have very little experience here. But I imagine others do about what you did -- careful construction to within some tolerance -- followed by measuring the relative phases and amplitude differences between elements using specialized test equipment, which you did -- and then applying phase and attenuation correction values to beam-forming software. It sounds like you did well in making them. So wouldn't that be the following step -- calibration parameters in the software? (At some point you reach the limits of what you can do with the mechanicals. Nothing is perfect.) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 11 at 23:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you have phase shifters in the paths, so that the array can be electronically steered? If so, how are they controlled? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 12 at 0:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ And (sigh), what are you requirements for beam pointing accuracy and sidelobes? Keep in mind that will never be able to eliminate all phase variation between the 16 channels, or paths. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 12 at 0:46
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ FWIW, 5 degrees and 0.5 dB is very good. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 12 at 5:16

2 Answers 2

1
\$\begingroup\$

What you want is a variable-length transmission line. I had a couple of these, mechanically variable probably with some sort of sliding contact inside. Expensive. We're not supposed to say where things can be bought, but it wasn't hard to find at my usual supplier of microwave stuff.

Such a solution would not be practical for your problem. Maybe look into more precise fabrication?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Maybe a serpentine meander line can be trimmed during test? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 12 at 0:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the insight - its good to know such a solution exists. I agree, more precise fabrication is the way to go \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 12 at 16:52
1
\$\begingroup\$

A peak to peak phase variation of 5º sounds tight enough to me, but if you want to play around with phases, there is a way to tweak them on your PCB, exactly as you mentioned.

The method involves changing the propagation delay of the waves on each trace by adding a dielectric of a different constant directly onto the trace.

This method only achieves higher delay, as air has a lower dielectric constant than the materials you're able to add (if you were working with a potted circuit, I suppose adding a bubble onto the trace would have the opposite effect).

Of course, by changing the characteristic impedance of the transmission line, you are also sacrificing transmission coefficient, and are at risk of adding reflected power. In theory, the capacitance added by adding the dielectric could also cause your line to resonate within your working bandwidth, but I've never encountered that problem.

I don't know how to predict these negative effects precisely, (I'm a technician, not an engineer,) but I can tell you what materials I've used and their general effects:

  1. Loctite Hysol 1C. This epoxy is great for fine tuning, with minimal effect on transmission and reflexion. It also works well within a large range of environmental conditions.

  2. Arlon. This material is useful for larger phase differences, at the cost of a higher loss in transmission and reflexion.

  3. RF absorbant materials. These materials are usually used to ensure no radiated waves reflect off of the metal case of your module at higher frequencies. They can also be used to significantly affect phases, but cost tremendously in terms of transmission and reflexion.

For your application, I would reccomend you use Loctite Hysol 1C (also known as Torr-Seal), as your phase variation is already small. Use PPE though (gloves, respirator, eye protection). That stuff can be nasty.

I recommend you plug a network analyser in and play around with different materials. You can even use sticky tape, but that's hardly a permament solution. Normalise the data trace to the most delayed phase, and try to get the rest of them as close to zero. You can add any amount of any dielectric pretty much anywhere on your trace, as long as it is touching the trace, and not touching your ground.

Tell me how it goes !

-Patrick

New contributor
Patrick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Out of curiosity, can adding these materials cause the propagation delay to change in a temperature dependent way? E.g. as the equipment "warms up" after being switched on? \$\endgroup\$ Commented 13 hours ago

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.