Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/WikiProjects

This is an information page.

It is neither an encyclopedia article nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting.

Shortcuts

There are no separate for venues for the deletion discussion of WikiProjects, thus all WikiProject deletion discussions are to be taken place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (MFD) and are subject to the guidelines of the same.

This page, however, maintains an automatic list of the ongoing deletion discussions of the various WikiProjects, or their subpages, and serves as an one-stop destination for those who are only primarily interested in WikiProject-related MfDs.

Current MfDs

There are currently 4 WikiProject-related MfDs ongoing.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikisource/Citation Uniformity/Cite wikisource

This is an unused template in project space that shouldn't be used as it's completely outdated at this point. Template:Cite wikisource is the one that should be used. Gonnym (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - This looks like an unused template in project space. It appears to be viewed approximately 20 times a year, because it is there. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused subpage for a proposal that either became {{Cite wikisource}} or never got off the ground as a replacement for that template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject European Union/European English

Undiscussed advocacy page pushing Euro English, a disputed possible variant of English. Created by a now-vanished user whose other EU advocacy was reverted and/or disputed. See also this TFD. [Comment added later: This page has no incoming links or transclusions.] – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Seems more a single contributor's "personal project" than a community-backed element of an actual WikiProject. Guliolopez (talk) 19:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The only contributor has invoked the right to vanish, and this paper can vanish also. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not seem to have been adopted or edited by anyone else in the WikiProject or in general, safe to delete. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 02:09, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Dgp4004 (talk) 23:36, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:24, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Community/WikiHash

Unclear purpose or utility. -- Beland (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Delete - Could also be marked historical, but the history is that this coprolite has been occupying space and not viewed, for a long time. In other words, this is completely useless. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This was related to Wikipedia:Community hash, an alternative to the Community Portal which was proposed in 2005, but never saw any real usage. Omphalographer (talk) 20:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep and mark historical. no solid reason for deletion. ltbdl (activate) 15:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marking as historical would make sense if this were a resource which saw some meaningful usage, or which was the subject of community discussion. I don't think that's the case here; this is just an old bit of junk which went unnoticed for twenty years. It wasn't even linked from anywhere before this MFD. Omphalographer (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Star Mississippi 18:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/20th Century Studios

Unnecessary deletion sorting page for an overly narrow topic that is not linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Flat or Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Compact and only consists of a single AFD from 2023. Creator has been inactive since 2022. Sugar Tax (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This deletion sorting list, like all deletion sorting lists, states that it belongs to WikiProject Deletion sorting. Has this been discussed at WikiProject Deletion sorting? Also, should it be marked historical rather than deleted?Robert McClenon (talk) 19:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No need to mark something that's been used exactly once as historical, and it's extremely unlikely that anyone at the WikiProject would care about a page that was created unilaterally, is much narrower than their usual scope, and isn't in use. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.