Telebbit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game per WP:GNG. The game has no review coverage and none from reliable outlets that I can find online on a WP:BEFORE. All the reliable cited coverage is what you would call WP:ROUTINE - it regurgitates the press release of the game announcement, and the author says it looks cool, but hasn't played it or has any information on it. One citation implies that Famitsu 1824 has indeed provided WP:SIGCOV on it which is good, but that's awkwardly brought up from a mention of the publisher's Instagram post, with the magazine issue both WP:NONENG and WP:OFFLINE. That isn't enough to cross the line. VRXCES (talk) 03:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No policy based arguments yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 04:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per lack of WP:SIGCOV. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:07, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need a quorum here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:25, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficient notable as is, perhaps there are Korean NONENG sources. But the article creator is experienced enough and should know that this doesn't pass. Delete. IgelRM (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]