Thfeeder

CS1 error on 2024 GT World Challenge Asia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 GT World Challenge Asia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 GT World Challenge Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rodney Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2024 Super Formula Lights, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hmnphl (talk) 10:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Thfeeder (talk) 11:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Tottenham articles

Really, I don't like that style in the way you are splitting the transfers, it looks so messy and is unnecessary, can you please undo the rest please. Govvy (talk) 13:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I don't think it's messy. It's just to organize and differentiate between academy and first team. If you think this is messy you can revert it all. Thfeeder (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Transfers have nothing to do with academy or first team know. A transfer is a transfer, nothing more, nothing less, where a player plays is different. So please, I am really not a fan of that style you created, it looks ... odd to me. Govvy (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

We can agree to disagree about this stuff. I do this because like I said before in my previous statement. But I say this again, you can revert all back and I have no problems you revert all back. Thank you Thfeeder (talk) 15:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Thfeeder. Thank you for your work on Yuya Hiraki. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Super Taikyu Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tetsuya Tanaka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at PEC Zwolle, you may be blocked from editing. Anwegmann (talk) 10:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I just edit Eliano Reijnders nationality which is Indonesia, not Dutch anymore. Especially after he got called up to the Indonesia National team. I did not vandalize the article. Thfeeder (talk) 11:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Mobility Resort Motegi. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cenyu Han (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cenyu Han and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Thfeeder! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Issue with "Western name order" hatnote at Yifei Ye

Hey there! It looks like you reversed the names in the first hatnote at Yifei Ye from "Ye Yifei" to "Yifei Ye" in this edit.

The hatnote is there to show what Yifei Ye's name is in Chinese (the "native form") – in Chinese, the surname is written first. The hatnote should read "Ye Yifei", even though the article is titled "Yifei Ye" (how he is commonly known in English-language sources). More generally, if the hatnote lists the same title as the page, we wouldn't need a hatnote, would we? :)

I've fixed this for you now, but I just wanted to let you about it in case you encounter this template again. Toadspike [Talk] 09:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cenyu Han (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing has substantially changed since the last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cenyu Han and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercedes Junior Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Russell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lazer-kitty (talk) 17:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

PONOS Racing

PONOS Racing is a sponsorship identity, like Supercheap Auto Racing for example, and any attempt to label it as anything other - i.e. the way you've written the article - is misleading. Language like "The former number 10 GAINER Nissan GT-R NISMO GT3 was replaced by the number 45 Ferrari 296 GT3 entered by PONOS Racing" is also incredibly convoluted and reads like advertising; change it. 2001:8003:268E:A800:DD52:3678:1A61:B4C7 (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I get what you mean. But previous years in motorsport there is plenty of sponsorship that really owns the team like British American Racing which owned by British American Tobacco, Super Nova Racing is sponsored by Nova a Japanese company, and Leyton House Racing which a rebranded team from March by Leyton House a Japanese company. The team itself started sponsoring other teams and use PONOS Racing on their entry list, and now they have run independently. Also I did not write to mislead as "The former number 10 GAINER Nissan GT-R NISMO GT3 was replaced by the number 45 Ferrari 296 GT3 entered by PONOS Racing" is a fact that the number 10 car of GAINER replaced by the 45 PONOS Racing. I did not have the intention to promote and advertising as what is the point doing that, and I did not get money out of it. It is you feel like the page act like an advertisment. Thfeeder (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

B-Max SFL entries

Hey there, thanks for all your work on the Japanese racing series articles! I saw your addition of B-Max's SFL entries and was wondering if you know anything about their team structure for 2025 - are they back to running all their cars under one team, or will they announce who enters under which guise later on? Because if the first is true, we should report that in the team changes section, but if the latter is true, we have to wait for that announcement. Cheers, Hmnphl (talk) 07:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, so far BMax only mention BMax and HFDP Bmax, but we will see until the series release their entry list. Thfeeder (talk) 07:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the info - btw, the Instagram post you linked to the DELIGHTWORKS announcement seems to be a different one. Hmnphl (talk) 08:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Okay I fix it Thfeeder (talk) 08:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Delightworks and Toda

Hi there, I looked at the source you added to the Delightworks section for the 2025 SFL article. I was wondering how that confirms that Delightworks is indeed replacing Toda Racing, as that is not mentioned in the source. Could you explain that a little more to me? Thanks! Hmnphl (talk) 06:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately that there is no proper information that Delightworks replacing Toda Racing. But based on post season testing, and social media posting in X and Instagram, they take over the team's SFL entry. They tested with Toda's car and use the delightworks name. I don't think it's a rebrand on Toda or a sponsorship rebranding like Invicta Racing in F2, as I feel Delightworks is a new entity. That's the only info I can see. Thfeeder (talk) 06:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Intercontinental GT Challenge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sven Müller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Thfeeder. Thank you for your work on Tunku Abu Bakar. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Kiyoshi Umegaki

Hello Thfeeder, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kiyoshi Umegaki, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiyoshi Umegaki.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Kotaro Shimbara

Hello Thfeeder, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kotaro Shimbara, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotaro Shimbara.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from ja:Apr_(自動車事業) to Apr (racing team). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:48, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Kotaro Shimbara moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kotaro Shimbara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because consensus at AfD. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Toadspike [Talk] 17:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello, Thfeeder. I noticed that your recent edit to Juichi Wakisaka added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 08:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi there User:Sumanuil, I've saw you removed 2 of my pictures. But unfortunately these pictures that I posted is from my own phone camera, not from the internet. Thank you, and please do not remove it again. Thfeeder (talk) 08:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

2025 Porsche Carrera Cup Japan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Porsche Carrera Cup Japan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It also needs more sourcing so as to satisfy WP:VERIFY.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

GT World Challenge Australia

You removed the correct team names without discussion. Change it back as soon as possible. Vettelisthebest (talk) 01:48, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

I removed the sponsorship names in the team. The team names in the list that I changed is for to align together with the team standing's results which to not to make confusion. And it's to make same as other GT World Challenge series team names. Thfeeder (talk) 02:21, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

There was no confusion. Change it back. Vettelisthebest (talk) 07:47, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

If you want to revert back, go ahead and do it yourself. If you do not like what I did, then revert it. Then give a proper explanation why you feel you need to revert it back. So far you come to my talk page and tell me to revert my own edits but not asking me nice and politely. But by looking at your past edit history, you are rude and not polite based on your comments alone. I don't know how old are you, but please stop act like a child whose parents never taught politeness and etiquette. You are better than that. Thfeeder (talk) 07:58, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Bros been on Wikipedia for 12 years (a third of my life) and acts like this, damn 😭 BurningBlaze05 (talk) 08:04, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 FIA Formula 3 Championship (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanilla Wizard was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I think it's a little too soon to be publishing this

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2026 FIA Formula 3 Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Vanilla  Wizard 💙 02:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Luca Gunter / Tottenham Hotspur FC

Hi. To avoid repeat edits, can we discuss this? I am repeatedly saying Gunter is a part of the first team squad according to the cited source https://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/2025/august/202526-premier-league-squad-numbers-confirmed/ dated 15 August. You are disregarding this. I am aware Gunter is not part of the squad on https://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/teams/men/players/ which is why I cite both sources at the head of the section on the page. It certainly doesn't help when two sources on the same website give different information but perhaps this will be resolved when the final squad is announced at the end of the window. Perhaps it's something that should be discussed by a wider group on the THFC talk page in an attempt to reach a broad consensus and avoid argument. Views? LenF54 (talk) 16:34, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. Even tho Luca Gunter have a listed number in, he's not part of the first team squad in the their website [1]. Even from last season his name was listed along with Mikey Moore [2]. So I removed it as he's not listed as part of first team, and if I put him in the academy part, he can't as he has not played in a competitive first-team match. I feel better to remove the "The following current Under–21 or Under–18 players have played in a competitive first-team match for Tottenham Hotspur." line and we put him in the academy bracket. Do you agree? user:LenF54 Hope can be resolve. Thfeeder (talk) 00:52, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Sorry but no. As I said Gunter is not part of the squad on their website but IS part of the squad on the more recent list of 15 August, which says "we can confirm our list of Premier League squad numbers for the new campaign". Premier League. I agree he should not be included in the academy sub-section, for the reason you state. I see no reason to remove the line you mention - Arsenal, Brighton, Chelsea, Manchester City and Newcastle all include similar, while there are some other Premier League clubs that include a full academy listing on what could be regarded as the first-team page. Getting back to the sticking point, you put no weight behind the source list of 15 August and perhaps I put too much weight behind it. I don't think you and I alone can resolve this and I see nothing useful in hitting the ball backwards and forwards; perhaps one of us should put something on the THFC talk page and open up the discussion to see if some of the regular contributors can help. Regards, LenF54 (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

The problem is even tho his name appeared in the list, his name in the wiki page of first team squad and even in the academy did not include him and that is already a whole year his name was not listed. Even when Alfie Devine & Dane Scarlett got minutes playing time and their names were not part of the first team before they were promoted thus named it to the list. And I am not lying for saying that as I've observe this page countless times and I know if there's wrong part I change it thus why I remove Luca Gunter part because it was never meant in the first place but constantly add by some new users. If you feel that my part of doing is wrong, you may add Luca Gunter name to the list or ask the thfc talkpage about this as I do not want to drag this discussion too long. Thanks Thfeeder (talk) 00:44, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 FIA Formula 3 Championship (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2026 FIA Formula 3 Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kotaro Shimbara (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Destinyokhiria were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kotaro Shimbara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Destinyokhiria 💬 07:11, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Indianapolis 8 Hour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 FIA Formula 3 Championship (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lots of announcements. Likely WP:TOOSOON as season is six months away.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2026 FIA Formula 3 Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

f1 acadmay 2026

Thank you for creating the F1 2026 Academy page. I had already created it before, but users deleted it. Amini1999ad (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Honda Formula Dream Project, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Honda Racing and Ren Sato.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

formule e

I read the note, but why should someone who has a penalty get the title of pole position and three points? First place belonged to Dennis. Also, why did they give the fastest lap point to Nato, who is not among the top ten drivers? The writings are contradictory. Amini1999ad (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

It's within the rules. Wherlein got a penalty for wheelspinning in the pitlane during qualifying, which is not related to affect the quali time thus he still gets the point. While Nato in fact did not get the point for FL, seems someone edit did not realise that.

While I see you have a good intent to edit some articles and create ones, please do it properly. I saw some of your edits are not correct, looks disruptive, and people will assume you for doing vandalism if you did not fix and know how to edit page properly. There's a reason on why lots of your edits are being reverted and remove, because it's not right and not needed. While wikipedia is free to edit, and add information, you need to follow the rules.

We all make mistakes, and I for one sometimes made one. But, you need to stop with these edits that people will assume you as disruptive. Also I tell you, if you want to ask regarding an article, please put the message on the article's talk, like for example on the Talk:2025–26 Formula E World Championship page, and not on my page as someone who are more inform than me can answer some questions.

You have to learn a lot to do some editing, and understanding when is the correct way to post an article as you cannot post on your free will and thinking it's ready just like about the 2026 F1 Academy season when you did not do it properly and not doing it in draft first. Once again please realise that you need to learn edit properly. Thfeeder (talk) 03:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

If Wikipedia is open for exchanging information, then what's wrong with me adding more information? Are you upset that I left a message on your page? You asked me a question, and I answered it on your page. Yes, I need to learn how to edit, and I'm still a beginner. Amini1999ad (talk) 06:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Just learn how to read the points standings on the website and the rules and then you’ll be okay. 👍 RxxingAddict (talk) 18:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

mercede jonuir team

The names of four young drivers are not on the Mercedes site driver list. Their page cannot be found. Their contract has ended. Also, Pin is not in F1 Academy, so it should not be listed. Amini1999ad (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

My bad. Yes what you did was correct. The way you edit once again made me thinking you just play around with the article. Next time you have to placed the drivers to the "Former drivers" section, you can't just left it on the "Current drivers" and add the year they not continue the program, then The F1 Academy can't left empty, just add TBA on it because the next year there will be one that will drive under Mercedes. Thfeeder (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I still can't edit well. My ability was just at this level. Amini1999ad (talk) 13:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion

Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to 2025 Super Formula Championship.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref> and one or more <ref name="foo"/> referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref> but left the <ref name="foo"/>, which results in a in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/> with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any .

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 17 December 2025 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}} to your talk page.