should there be a separate article for soyjak.party?

edit

since russian wikipedia already has it Mustaze (talk) 23:06, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

I suppose that would depend on whether there is a wealth of reliable sources, as well as whether they significantly cover the website's history beyond the general info already in this article. RhymeWrens (talk) 23:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
They already have an entire Wiki with documented history that can be found here wiki.soyjak.st/Happenings, not to mention, arguably it is the second most popular imageboard at the moment as some of it's meme have slithered it's way onto online spaces (like the whole billions must die meme) Bigbiz3 (talk) 16:08 — Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
There are barely reliable sources that cover it. So no. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:31, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
See Soyjak.party and assess it's source standing at the moment, @PARAKANYAA (It is in my opinion requiring more WP:SIGCOV other than Rango 2025, but it's better than nothing and it's reliable). I will add sources later on the talkpage for you to decide since you are usually an WP:Expert editor in fringe-related articles. -- ~2025-39704-27 (talk) 09:10, 12 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
The Pirate Wires piece is good but everything else is either about the hack or the ADL piece. Taken together it could narrowly scrape over WP:N, probably, which is why I haven't nominated it for deletion, but I also wouldn't be surprised if someone did nominate it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:49, 12 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@PARAKANYAA, take a look at the sources I added to the talkpage section, and see what you can salvage to make that semi-protected article more notable. ~2025-40599-94 (talk) 11:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure if I want to get more involved in all that. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:23, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wizardchan

edit

Doesn't wizardchan still exist or has another website been created with the same name? Raync (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:51, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Circleboard" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Circleboard has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 28 § Circleboard until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply