| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does anybody know how to transpose this table for better display when page is enlarged?
edit| m | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | n-cube | Names | Schläfli Coxeter |
Vertex 0-face |
Edge 1-face |
Face 2-face |
Cell 3-face |
4-face |
5-face |
6-face |
7-face |
8-face |
9-face |
10-face |
| 0 | 0-cube | Point Monon |
( ) |
1 | ||||||||||
| 1 | 1-cube | Line segment Ditel |
{} |
2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | 2-cube | Square Tetragon |
{4} |
4 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3-cube | Cube Hexahedron |
{4,3} |
8 | 12 | 6 | 1 | |||||||
| 4 | 4-cube | Tesseract Octachoron |
{4,3,3} |
16 | 32 | 24 | 8 | 1 | ||||||
| 5 | 5-cube | Penteract Deca-5-tope |
{4,3,3,3} |
32 | 80 | 80 | 40 | 10 | 1 | |||||
| 6 | 6-cube | Hexeract Dodeca-6-tope |
{4,3,3,3,3} |
64 | 192 | 240 | 160 | 60 | 12 | 1 | ||||
| 7 | 7-cube | Hepteract Tetradeca-7-tope |
{4,3,3,3,3,3} |
128 | 448 | 672 | 560 | 280 | 84 | 14 | 1 | |||
| 8 | 8-cube | Octeract Hexadeca-8-tope |
{4,3,3,3,3,3,3} |
256 | 1024 | 1792 | 1792 | 1120 | 448 | 112 | 16 | 1 | ||
| 9 | 9-cube | Enneract Octadeca-9-tope |
{4,3,3,3,3,3,3,3} |
512 | 2304 | 4608 | 5376 | 4032 | 2016 | 672 | 144 | 18 | 1 | |
| 10 | 10-cube | Dekeract Icosa-10-tope |
{4,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3} |
1024 | 5120 | 11520 | 15360 | 13440 | 8064 | 3360 | 960 | 180 | 20 | 1 |
More natural viewpoint
editThe section Faces contains this fragment:
"The number of the -dimensional hypercubes (just referred to as -cubes from here on) contained in the boundary of an -cube is
- , where and denotes the factorial of ."
But there is no good reason to limit the counted faces to the boundary.
The n-cube is a perfectly fine polytope, and it has exactly one additional face beyond those on the boundary: its single n-dimensional face.
What's more, this corresponds to the case above where m = n, and it is easy to see that the very same formula is then equal to 1, the correct count.
Generalized hypercubes?
editThe first paragraph of the section Generalized hypercubes is as follows:
"In complex Hilbert space, regular complex polytopes can be defined and are called generalized hypercubes, γp
n = p{4}2{3}...2{3}2, or .. . Real solutions exist with p = 2, i.e. γ2
n = γn = 2{4}2{3}...2{3}2 = {4,3,..,3}. For p > 2, they exist in . The facets are generalized (n−1)-cubes and the vertex figure are regular simplexes."
But the meaning of all this notation is unclear and needs to be explained, if any reader is going to understand this section.
In particular, what does this mean:
γp
n = p{4}2{3}...2{3}2
???
I hope someone familiar with this subject will make this section comprehensible.
offset
edit- The hypercube (offset) family is one of three regular polytope families, labeled by Coxeter as γn.
Why is that word (offset) here? Is it a synonym of hypercube?? Is it leftover from a syntax error? —Tamfang (talk) 16:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know and searching Google Scholar didn't find anything relevant. I think it should be removed. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:29, 24 June 2025 (UTC)