Talk:Hypercube

Latest comment: 5 months ago by David Eppstein in topic offset

Does anybody know how to transpose this table for better display when page is enlarged?

edit
Hypercube elements   (sequence A038207 in the OEIS)
m 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
n n-cube Names Schläfli
Coxeter
Vertex
0-face
Edge
1-face
Face
2-face
Cell
3-face

4-face

5-face

6-face

7-face

8-face

9-face

10-face
0 0-cube Point
Monon
( )
 
1
1 1-cube Line segment
Ditel
{}
 
2 1
2 2-cube Square
Tetragon
{4}
   
4 4 1
3 3-cube Cube
Hexahedron
{4,3}
     
8 12 6 1
4 4-cube Tesseract
Octachoron
{4,3,3}
       
16 32 24 8 1
5 5-cube Penteract
Deca-5-tope
{4,3,3,3}
         
32 80 80 40 10 1
6 6-cube Hexeract
Dodeca-6-tope
{4,3,3,3,3}
           
64 192 240 160 60 12 1
7 7-cube Hepteract
Tetradeca-7-tope
{4,3,3,3,3,3}
             
128 448 672 560 280 84 14 1
8 8-cube Octeract
Hexadeca-8-tope
{4,3,3,3,3,3,3}
               
256 1024 1792 1792 1120 448 112 16 1
9 9-cube Enneract
Octadeca-9-tope
{4,3,3,3,3,3,3,3}
                 
512 2304 4608 5376 4032 2016 672 144 18 1
10 10-cube Dekeract
Icosa-10-tope
{4,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3}
                   
1024 5120 11520 15360 13440 8064 3360 960 180 20 1

More natural viewpoint

edit

The section Faces contains this fragment:

"The number of the  -dimensional hypercubes (just referred to as  -cubes from here on) contained in the boundary of an  -cube is

 , where   and   denotes the factorial of  ."

But there is no good reason to limit the counted faces to the boundary.

The n-cube is a perfectly fine polytope, and it has exactly one additional face beyond those on the boundary: its single n-dimensional face.

What's more, this corresponds to the case above where m = n, and it is easy to see that the very same formula   is then equal to 1, the correct count.

Generalized hypercubes?

edit

The first paragraph of the section Generalized hypercubes is as follows:

"In complex Hilbert space, regular complex polytopes can be defined and are called generalized hypercubes, γp
n
= p{4}2{3}...2{3}2, or     ..    . Real solutions exist with p = 2, i.e. γ2
n
= γn = 2{4}2{3}...2{3}2 = {4,3,..,3}. For p > 2, they exist in  . The facets are generalized (n1)-cubes and the vertex figure are regular simplexes."

But the meaning of all this notation is unclear and needs to be explained, if any reader is going to understand this section.

In particular, what does this mean:

  γp
n
= p{4}2{3}...2{3}2

???

I hope someone familiar with this subject will make this section comprehensible.

offset

edit
The hypercube (offset) family is one of three regular polytope families, labeled by Coxeter as γn.

Why is that word (offset) here? Is it a synonym of hypercube?? Is it leftover from a syntax error? —Tamfang (talk) 16:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I don't know and searching Google Scholar didn't find anything relevant. I think it should be removed. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:29, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply