 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2–3 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 501 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 19 December 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 18 December 2025 by ChrysGalley (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by ChrysGalley 3 days ago. | |
Comment: Unfortunately this needs more work on it. There are only 2 sources, one of which is back to the providing company, the other is effectively self-published. Neither are independent and neither demonstrate notability. So some more work is needed here first. See WP:GNG and the notability panels on the right side. ChrysGalley (talk) 21:57, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Festr (talk) 21:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
| VoIPmonitor | |
|---|---|
| Developer | Martin Vít |
| Written in | C++ (packet sniffer), PHP (web interface) |
| Operating system | Linux |
| Type | VoIP monitoring software, network packet analyzer |
| License | GNU General Public License (packet sniffer); proprietary commercial license (web interface) |
| Website | www |
VoIPmonitor is a Voice over IP (VoIP) monitoring application for Linux. It captures VoIP signalling and media traffic (including SIP and RTP) and calculates call-quality metrics such as packet loss, packet delay variation (jitter) and estimated MOS values based on the ITU-T G.107 E-model.[1][2]
VoIPmonitor is typically deployed as a passive sensor that monitors traffic on a network interface or mirrored port and stores per-call statistics for later analysis.[1] The software is distributed as an open-source packet sniffer with an additional commercial web interface.[1][3]
Reception
editGartner listed VoIPmonitor as a representative vendor in its 2016 Market Guide for Unified Communications Monitoring under "UC In-Depth and Packet-Level Monitoring".[4]
Functionality
editAcademic work has used VoIPmonitor to collect packet loss, packet delay variation and MOS measurements during VoIP experiments and evaluations.[1][2]
Use in research
editVoIPmonitor has been used as a measurement tool in academic work, including:
- a University of Cape Town master's thesis evaluating service quality in virtualised environments;[1]
- a peer-reviewed paper comparing VoIP quality metrics exported via IPFIX to results from other tools, including VoIPmonitor;[2]
- a 2015 journal article that used VoIPmonitor in experiments on bandwidth and concurrent call capacity of a VoIP infrastructure.[5]
- a Brno University of Technology bachelor’s thesis that describes VoIPmonitor as a comparative tool when evaluating call-quality analyzers.[6]
Security
editIn 2022, multiple critical vulnerabilities affecting the VoIPmonitor web interface were publicly reported, including an issue tracked as CVE-2022-24260.[3][7]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c d e Nkubito, Phillip Uwizeye (November 2012). Aggregated Service Consolidation by Multi-Server Virtualization (PDF) (Master of Science in Electrical Engineering thesis). University of Cape Town. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
- ^ a b c Matoušek, Petr; Kmet, Martin; Basel, Martin (2014). "On-line Monitoring of VoIP Quality Using IPFIX" (PDF). Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 12 (4). Retrieved 19 December 2025.
- ^ a b Lakshmanan, Ravie (2 March 2022). "Critical Security Bugs Uncovered in VoIPmonitor Monitoring Software". The Hacker News. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
- ^ Bhalla, Vivek (21 October 2016). Market Guide for Unified Communications Monitoring (Report). Gartner. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
- ^ Soroyewun, M. B.; Obiniyi, A. A. (April 2015). "Empirical Study of Achievable Bandwidth Capacity of VoIP Infrastructure in an Intranet with Open Source Tools". International Journal of Applied Information Systems. 8 (6): 40–50. doi:10.5120/ijais15-451325. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
- ^ Basel, Martin (2014). Analyzátor kvality hovorů VoIP (Bachelor’s thesis thesis) (in Czech). Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
- ^ "CVE-2022-24260 Detail". National Vulnerability Database. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 19 December 2025.
External links
edit- Official website
- VoIPmonitor sniffer (source code)
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.