Submission declined on 22 November 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Vdzchamp (talk) 22:32, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
A lateral flow reader is an instrument used to interpret the results of a lateral flow assay (LFA). Readers analyze the test and control lines on an assay strip using optical, imaging, fluorescence, or electrochemical detection methods, enabling qualitative, semi-quantitative, or fully quantitative diagnostic measurements. Lateral flow readers are widely used in rapid diagnostics, point-of-care testing, environmental monitoring, food safety testing, and veterinary medicine.[1]
Overview
editLateral flow assays gained prominence as simple visual tests; however, limitations in sensitivity and subjective interpretation led to the development of instrumented readers. Independent reviews highlight that quantitative and connected LFA readers now play a central role in point-of-care diagnostics by improving analytical sensitivity, reducing operator variability, and enabling digital data capture.[2][3]
Technology
editOptical and image-based detection
editMost lateral flow readers use optical systems that illuminate the test strip and capture an image with CCD or CMOS sensors. Image-processing algorithms identify line positions, quantify colorimetric intensity, and correct for background noise. These approaches form the basis of modern quantitative lateral flow testing.[2]
Fluorescence detection
editFluorescent LFAs use labels such as europium nanoparticles or quantum dots. Fluorescence-based readers incorporate excitation sources and emission filters, enabling detection of weak signals and higher analytical sensitivity than colorimetric formats.[4]
Electrochemical detection
editElectrochemical LFAs incorporate redox-active labels or conductive nanoparticles. Instrumented readers for these tests integrate miniature potentiostats to measure the electrical response generated at the test line, enabling highly sensitive quantification.[2]
Connectivity and data management
editModern readers may provide wireless communication, USB transfer, cloud connectivity, onboard storage, and compatibility with laboratory information systems. These capabilities support regulated workflows and remote or field-based diagnostics.[3]
Types of readers
edit- Benchtop readers – Laboratory instruments designed for high-precision quantification, calibration routines, and multi-assay support.
- Portable or handheld readers – Compact devices for point-of-care or field testing.
- Smartphone-based readers – Attachments or standalone applications that use a smartphone’s camera and processing capabilities to analyze test strips.[2]
Applications
editLateral flow readers are used across several sectors:
- Medical diagnostics – infectious diseases, pregnancy testing, cardiac biomarkers, therapeutic drug monitoring.[1]
- Food safety – detection of allergens, mycotoxins, and pathogens.
- Environmental monitoring – water quality, chemical contaminant detection.
- Veterinary diagnostics – rapid testing for pathogens in animals.
- Industrial and forensic testing – drug screening and on-site chemical analysis.
Independent reviews emphasize that quantitative LFA readers significantly expand the capabilities of rapid testing platforms beyond simple visual interpretation.[3]
Advantages
edit- Objective and reproducible interpretation
- Potential for increased sensitivity compared to unaided visual reading
- Electronic data storage and traceability
- Compatibility with regulated diagnostic workflows
Limitations
edit- Higher cost compared to visual interpretation
- Calibration and maintenance requirements
- Compatibility dependent on strip geometry and assay format
- Performance affected by environmental conditions such as lighting or temperature
Industry example: Detekt Biomedical
editDetekt Biomedical LLC is one example of a manufacturer of commercial lateral flow assay readers. The company produces handheld and benchtop instruments used for quantitative analysis of test strips, incorporating optical imaging, data storage, and connectivity features.[5]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Koczula, K. M.; Gallotta, A. (2016). "Lateral flow assays". Essays in Biochemistry. 60(1): 111–120. doi:10.1042/EBC20150012.
- ^ a b c d Park, J. (2022). "Lateral Flow Immunoassay Reader Technologies for Quantitative Point-of-Care Testing". Sensors. 22(19): 7398. doi:10.3390/s22197398.
- ^ a b c Singh, N.; et al. (2024). "Lateral flow assays: Progress and evolution of recent trends in point-of-care testing". Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 173: 117645. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2024.117645.
- ^ Xie, Y.; et al. (2021). "An Overview for the Nanoparticles-Based Quantitative Lateral Flow Immunoassay". Small Methods. 5(11): 2101143. doi:10.1002/smtd.202101143.
- ^ "RDS-2500 Portable Assay Reader". Detekt Biomedical LLC. Retrieved 2025-02-18.
Category:Medical diagnostics Category:Analytical chemistry Category:Laboratory equipment

- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.