ask me about my cats

@beabaseball / beabaseball.tumblr.com

she/them. am white. aro/ace. My labels may be loose but my morals fuckin aint. Trying to be Jewish. Appalachia. | fandom blog @screamting
Avatar
Reblogged
Surprisingly, the security issues that preoccupy the rest of the world (and Israelis, as well) are less likely to factor in the election. It’s not that Netanyahu’s forever wars are seen as a stunning success. Successive polls show that voters do not think the country is more secure, particularly after the Iran war. Yet, across the political spectrum, Oct. 7 has left so deep a scar that many Israelis believe the country has no choice but to pursue its enemies aggressively or risk another massacre. Their tolerance for failure is high. As a result, the opposition can only nip at the edges of Netanyahu’s policies.
Nevertheless, it is reasonable to assume that there will be some change on the security front. In Gaza, a government led by Eisenkot would no longer pursue the far right’s dreams of expelling the Palestinians and rebuilding settlements. Israel will likely end its unrelenting attacks and may even pull out its troops. Gaza’s reconstruction may move forward under a new Israeli government, if Hamas agrees to something approaching disarmament. In Lebanon, where Israel occupies a security zone in the south, the new government will face the same dilemma as the old one, namely that pulling out troops would enable Hezbollah to threaten Israel’s north. Nevertheless, the new government will likely give Trump’s peace plan a more serious try and stage at least limited withdrawals. The Iran theater is no longer Israel’s to decide on: By bringing the United States into the war, Israel has forfeited control.
In the West Bank, the wave of settler violence and settlement-building will be tamped down but not eliminated. The extremist wing of the settlement movement has become too powerful and rooted. In any case, there will be no movement toward a two-state solution. Oct. 7 buried the idea of Palestinian statehood for the foreseeable future, and neither Israel nor Trump’s Washington is interested.

every day i am thankful to ancient humans for the domestication of the cat. fucking genius idea. agriculture was a good one too btw but you really outdid yourselves with the cat thing

rent lowering gunshot time so i actually do not think all israelis are evil or that israeli companies are untrustworthy or indeed that israeli newspapers are wildly inaccurate simply because they are israeli. holding any of these views is bad and xenophobic actually. performative protests against israeli people existing in the global space a la refusing to play the israeli football team are completely ridiculous and also xenophobic. <3 bye if u think this post makes me bad and racist for some reason & maybe think about why you think that

just read "the lottery" by shirley jackson for the first time, and I've never read a better story for thinking about the functioning of systemic violence in real life. Systemic violence as perpetrated by people who are friendly and occasionally fumbling, who are primarily occupied with their everyday concerns of home and family. Violence perpetrated by people who believe their actions are perhaps regrettable but ultimately necessary, even though the system could be reimagined at any point. People who comprehend that the violence would not happen without their compliance, but feel a squirming discomfort at the idea of change. Systemic violence stripped of its original symbolic meaning and logic, perpetrated through tradition and the vague sense that all this violence must be serving some purpose. Violence as evident in the predilections of unruly little boys who can't wait to pick up the stones, even against their own mothers. Violence perpetrated against the one who loses the luck of the draw, and therefore deserves what she gets, no matter how she protests that it isn't fair, it isn't fair.

YEAEAASSS oh man I am so happy to come across a post about my favorite of the Short Stories That Will Mess You Up In Twelve Minutes, because I reread it recently and I have so much to say

First of all, if anyone here hasn't read it yet, GO. I promise. Go now, trust me.

You can read it in like twelve minutes!

And it'll mess you up! :D

Ok spoilers ahead baby here we go

So: of the many many incredible themes and messages here, what do we want to dig into first? Op mentioned systemic violence being perpetrated by well-meaning people against themselves, for reasons no one even remembers anymore. You're right; they believe this violence may be regrettable but it's ultimately necessary, even though they could stop doing it at any time. And some cities have stopped, a fact that makes our characters uncomfortable in ways they can't fully articulate.

YES.

And the really striking thing (pun intended because I'm terrible) is that it's direct and visceral violence. They're not just pushing a button or signing an executive order; they're not even just throwing the rocks from ten feet away. The haunting last line is "and then they were upon her." This violence is intimate.

But they still consider themselves good people. They consider their traditions a sacred link to their past and a safeguard for their future. These are normal average people who gossip with each other and tut-tut their children and bitch about taxes.

They are just like us.

And once a year, they commit an act that in any other setting they'd rightly consider an atrocity. And then they all look at each other, their faces covered in blood and dirt and brain matter from someone they've known all their lives (someone who, incidentally, was on board with all this right up until she was the one sacrificed), all of them equally complicit in cold-blooded murder.

And then they go home and have lunch, and the box is carelessly put back in storage until next July.

YESSS

But can we also talk about the gender divide in the story? How the proceedings are run by men - but when a woman is selected, it's the women who move in first? Did you notice that the last thing the victim did in her life was finish up the dishes? Wanna delve into the psychological implications of one woman picking up two small rocks, just enough to be seen participating but not enough to be lethal, while another woman weilds the biggest rock she can lift? Is that second woman succumbing to rage and bloodlust - or is she hoping to end the victim's suffering as quickly as possible?

Want to talk about class divide? Like how wealthy Mr Summers is the one who gets to handle the box and preside over the event, and he's the one who made the black spot and folded all the papers... so it would be incredibly easy for him to mark them in some subtle way that nobody else would notice? Which would explain why he's the only person who's chill and convivial the whole time, because he knows he's gamed the system?

What about the generational divide? How the oldest person in town, oblivious to his own survivor bias, is the most vocal supporter of this tradition with a catchy slogan that ryhmes and everything? How he's the first to loudly shame and scold anyone who might someday question this tradition, because he can't imagine not beating someone to death once a year? Because the only thing more painful than having to think about all the people he's helped slaughter would be if everyone else decided that all those deaths had been pointless? When those children grow up, how many of them will remember all this with disgust - and how many will advocate for bringing the lottery back?

You could even talk about the difference between city folk and country folk, because the larger your population is the better your odds are. How many people moved away from this particular town for that very reason?

Actually wait, I think I first want to talk about something that just recently occurred to me: this story was first published in 1948, just a few years after World War II.

I can't believe I never realized it before, but among all its other messages, "The Lottery" is also about the draft.

The US has always had a... complicated relationship with WWII, because it wasn't fought on our soil but it absolutely shaped our culture. For a lot of Americans, their experience of the war boiled down to various fundraisers, general frugality, and watching Donald Duck's fever dreams about being a Nazi. (For real!) It was something important but distant - something that happened, as the one song put it, Over There.

Oh except for almost every man aged 18-45, who was enrolled in the draft whether he liked it or not. And if your number comes up, well, off you go! Time to fight and kill and die for a good cause! Thank you for your service and/or sacrifice! We're all cool with this, for some reason!

When this story was first published in the New Yorker, it received severe backlash. People were super duper mad. As a teenager, I assumed it had offended so many because they thought there was some small town really doing this, in the same way that Jonathan Swift published "A Modest Proposal" and then immediately had to publish "What?? No, God no, I didn't mean we should ACTUALLY start eating Irish babies, Jesus Christ, what's wrong with you people".

But upon reread, I realized that everyone in 1948 would have immediately spotted the parallels to conscription, because everyone knew someone who'd been torn from his home with no apparent rhyme or reason and either came back broken or never came back at all. And people were told that this is all very good and normal - that your loved one was a hero who died making the whole planet safe for democracy, somehow, a line vague enough to still work today.

So these readers had offered up their sons and brothers and husbands while they held parades and waved banners and felt really good about themselves for being on the right side of history... and then Ms Jackson (I'm nasty) rolls up and says "Actually, what if it wasn't worth it? What if we just killed a bunch of people in horrible ways because that's just what we always do in war? Hey, hey you - yeah YOU, reading this right now. Set aside all the propaganda you've been taught, and ask yourself: how complicit are you in these deaths? How many rocks did you throw in the town square today? How many will you throw next time? How many next times will there be?

"Because the answer is never zero."

I have already written about how much I disliked this stunt, how much I object to the use of AI, how isolating the praise for it felt (to the point I experienced what I can only categorize as despair at how alone we are, that anyone was willing to settle for this), and how damaging I believe it ultimately is (no matter how well intended, the impact has been extremely negative). that in mind, Hen makes worthwhile points here. Boy George was not cancelled for criminal behavior, for abuse, for creating “music” with AI, for any other offense. the rage that has led to professional losses is entirely because of the stance he took rejecting antisemitism.

we can hold both truths at once: that this was not good allyship, in fact it’s done harm, and that the backlash he is receiving is not due to his transgressions, but because he rejected the now popular, even socially demanded, blood libel and said, “I stand with the Jews.”

In January 2009, a judge at Snaresbrook Crown Court sentenced George O’Dowd to fifteen months in prison. The world knew him as Boy George. A jury had convicted him of falsely imprisoning Audun Carlsen, a Norwegian model he handcuffed to a wall fixture in his London flat. Carlsen told the court he wrenched the fixture loose to get free, then ran into the street in his underwear while the singer swung a metal chain at him. The judge called the act premeditated, callous and humiliating. Carlsen has said he was diagnosed with PTSD and spent a decade in therapy.
George served four months. Then British entertainment welcomed him home. He coached on The Voice UK for the BBC, then The Voice Australia. In 2022 he joined I’m a Celebrity, and when a few viewers objected, ITV issued a statement about spent convictions and kept filming. In 2024 he starred in Moulin Rouge on Broadway. This summer he was cast as King Herod in Jesus Christ Superstar at the London Palladium, sharing the role with Richard Armitage and Julian Clary. Opening night was set for August 3.
He never made it to the stage.
On July 26, he posted a song called “We Will Dance Again,” captioned with a single word: Shalom. The title is the phrase survivors of the Nova festival massacre made into a vow. The lyrics reject the word genocide and call the war what he believes it is: a war. They describe what happened to young women at Nova on October 7. They accuse fellow musicians of waving flags and following the herd, and they close with a plain declaration that he stands with the Jews.
The backlash took hours. Within four days, his manager announced he would no longer appear at the Palladium. The statement praised George for standing by his “personal convictions” and never named them. It did not have to. Everyone reading it knew which convictions were meant, because nothing else about the man had ever cost him a job.
His critics deserve one concession. George makes a poor martyr. His record is real, and his victim is real, and I hold no brief for him. The song itself is an awkward piece of work. He admitted he made it with AI, and joked that he would have struggled to write it with a human. If your complaint is that a pop icon outsourced his conscience to software, that complaint has merit. The sequence tells the truth anyway. Nobody organized to remove him from a stage over synthetic vocals. The campaign began when the words became clear, and the words were about Jews.
Here is what the timeline establishes, and it should unsettle you far more than one aging pop star’s career. A violent conviction was survivable. Pleading guilty to filing a false police report in New York, where officers found cocaine in his apartment, was survivable. Four decades of feuds and provocations were survivable. The industry priced all of it, paid it, and booked him again and again. One song of solidarity with Jews exceeded the budget in four days.
If George were the only data point, you could argue his history finally caught up with him. He is one of two.
In June, Gwyneth Paltrow appeared in a commercial for 51 Park, a luxury residential tower in Herzliya, a coastal city north of Tel Aviv. The ad was filmed in New York, and it contains no politics of any kind. The tower stands on undisputed ground in a wealthy beach town. She wakes up, goes for a run, and tells her driver the building she lives in is in Herzliya. For this, an influencer with 3.4 million followers renamed her “Gwynicide Paltrow,” and her Instagram flooded with accusations of complicity in genocide over an ad she never even posted herself. One celebrity asked publicly whether she was a genuinely nasty person or just stupid, and concluded she needed to be cancelled.
Her actual record is worth reviewing. Paltrow spent two decades selling pseudoscience through Goop, including a settlement with California prosecutors over unsupported health claims for jade eggs. She sat through a televised ski-crash trial. She has delivered enough out-of-touch moments to sustain a small meme economy. Through it all, the public response was mockery: parodies and jokes about kale. The first time in her adult life that she faced organized hatred, actual venom, demands for her erasure, was the moment she said the name of an Israeli city out loud.
Two celebrities, opposite profiles. One carries a conviction for chaining a man to a wall. The other’s worst offense is a rock crystal. One made an explicit political statement. The other made none at all. Both discovered the same tripwire in the same summer, and it had nothing to do with harm or guilt. Proximity to Jews was sufficient.
That is the finding, and it required no leaked memo to uncover. The enforcement mechanism published its own price list in real time. Assault, drugs, deception and quackery all sit in the forgivable column. Standing with Jews, or standing near them, sits alone in the other one.
The same runs in the opposite direction. In June, Prada named the rapper Saint Levant its global ambassador and pushed a campaign video to 33 million followers in which he wore a pendant of the land from the river to the sea with Israel removed from the outline. This is the same performer who stood on a stage in November 2024, days after mobs hunted Israeli soccer fans through the streets of Amsterdam, and thanked the attackers for taking care of business. A luxury house reviewed that record and saw the face of a brand. Then in November, Glamour crowned Ms. Rachel a Woman of the Year for her Gaza advocacy, and the room rose to its feet as she described the war with the exact word Boy George was pushed off a stage for refusing. Weeks earlier she had become a global ambassador for the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund. Her care for children in Gaza pushed her to such extreme that she repeats extreme anti-Jewish rhetoric in the name of Christianity. The asymmetry is still the story. One vocabulary earns ovations and ambassadorships. The other vocabulary earns an unlit theater.
I have documented this pattern from other angles, from the DJ hounded out of her own concert in France for being Jewish to the coordinated networks that manufacture outrage on demand. Boy George and Gwyneth Paltrow are useful because they remove every excuse. You cannot claim this is about accountability when the industry forgave the chain and punished the song.
September will bring the dates George was supposed to perform, and other artists will keep making the same calculation he made, weighing solidarity against a career. The evidence of what that costs is public now, and the score is easy to keep: which people face campaigns, and which never do, whatever they have done.
If this reached you, share it with someone who still believes cancellation follows wrongdoing. And if you want this work to continue, subscribe. I intend to keep the record either way.

the signal this sends is clear: standing with Jewish people, or Israel, puts the apparatus of your entire reputation and career at risk. is it any wonder, then, that hardly anyone, especially in the spotlight, will take that on?

the industry forgave the chain and punished the song.”

Wrote a really big post about oppenheimer and avengers civil war being similar movies but i deleted it because the world isn't ready

Its because the narrative fails if the viewer doesn't share the view of being from a powerful country instead of-- *a cia agent shoots me before i can finish it, i am found dead in my room, my mom screams, this destroys my family. The case is revealed leading to a horrible two months where brazil and the us are in a cold war kind of state but brazil settles and apologizes to the us because it knows the usa can kill them all. Two years later the us makes a movie about how the man who murdered me for a tumblr post was REALLY sad about it but he has to live with killing innocent people because thats how poweful countries work and whoever says you shouldn't kill people for othwr countries is wrong. He is like prometheus. He decides that safest hands are our own. It wins an Oscar. I do not show up in the movie in case someone might humanize a non usamerican victim by mistake. My mom is mentioned, but her scene is cut for time. They bring up the possibility that i was a communist and a really old tumblr post to make people question my morality. There are 7 celebrity cameos. Both joe biden and donald trump show up as characters in the movie as well as neymar and lionel messi, who was in the united states at the time, and could possibly have heard about it*

It's the Royal Academy of Art Young Artist's Summer Show. One of my favourite exhibitions of the year. Like. Not only are the older kids insanely talented, the younger ones' artist statements will just punch you right in the face.

Jeffrey is my cat and he feels like my heart

Click [here] for the full online exhibition

These are all so good!!! please look at them

I think my favorite is this one

I think that part of what irks me about AI being used even for "small" stuff like meme graphics (aside from all the larger problems obviously) is like.... the time spent on it was part of the humor. "this is a silly inconsequential joke but I had to stop everything and spend 5 minutes making it" was, at least for me, part of the joke. Someone really took time out of their day to make me look at something silly they took time out of their day to make. Now it's like someone took time out of my day to make me look at something no one even made. Stop wasting my time if you aren't wasting yours too.

An antiviral pill has, for the first time, been shown to prevent COVID-19 in people exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus at home, according to trial results published today in the New England Journal of Medicine1. The drug could be a lifeline for those who still face real danger from the virus, such as care-home residents or transplant recipients on immune-suppressing medication.

There are good things happening in the world.

Households exposed to COVID-19 now have an oral drug specifically cleared to prevent infection after contact with a sick person. The FDA listed Xocova, the brand name for ensitrelvir, as a 2026 novel drug approval for post-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 following contact with an infected individual. The decision fills a gap that has persisted since the pandemic’s early years: until now, no oral antiviral carried an FDA-approved indication for prevention rather than treatment.

Avatar
Reblogged

Having to spread this again.

I’m still struggling to pay for food and other necessities, I’m queer, disabled, trans, latino, and currently living under the control of parents that institutionalized me for two years.

I have a massive amount of allergies and food I can eat is often not provided.

Please if you can donate or share I would really appreciate it.

I need help.

My baby Kitty who I am calling my baby despite the fact he’s 15 which the vet keeps reminding us is “super senior”

He is on his way out, he was diagnosed with leukemia not too long ago. We want to be able to put him down when it gets bad. And we need 160$ for that. Then to take care of his body it’s another 350$ if we want to get his ashes back and we really do. I am tired of begging but this is my baby.

Please spread the word

Okay. So . I have an art place nearby that's doing 'wine bottle painting' in that they have cut wood into wine bottle shapes and people can paint on them and then later the bottles are going up for sale at a winery.

I have kind of generic ideas for two wine bottles that I hope would sell because they are generic, but also, every single time someone who DOESN'T know they're supposed to be wine bottles has come in, the reaction has been exactly the same

And then they try to paddle whoever they came in with.

So below the read more is the mockup. I'm sure some people already know where this is going. But my question is: if no one at the winery has the refined taste to want to put this up on their wall, is there anyone out there who would pay my $35+shipping to help me cover the entry fees and make sure I do not have to put it on my wall