"Canada's AI strategy: A flawed approach"

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

"Canada remains stuck in the wrong AI paradigm. Ottawa’s latest AI investment package focused almost entirely on compute infrastructure, as if the biggest challenge was a lack of servers. Meanwhile, little to no funding was allocated to fostering AI adoption or literacy. That’s like building libraries while neglecting to teach Canadians how to read." My op-ed this morning in the Globe and Mail: https://lnkd.in/g3JW5mSH

Dom Spiers

Public Sector at Wiz Canada 🇨🇦 | Secure everything you build and run in the cloud

9mo

Little to no conversation on AI Security either. The lack of security (and misconfiguration) to protect models (poisioning) and training data (exfiltration) from nefarious actors is already becoming one of the biggest risks in AI implementation. https://www.wiz.io/blog/wiz-research-uncovers-exposed-deepseek-database-leak

Atul Bhatt

Founder and CEO - ModuRisk | Busy building MCRS - the FICO style score for the modular construction industry | Entrepreneur | Advisor | Market Development Executive

9mo

How is progress in adoption and literacy of AI really a function of funding? In what ways does lack of funding prevent Canadians and Canadian companies from embracing AI? My experience working with Canadian companies, whether it is using AI or any new paradigm is Canadian companies are frustratingly risk averse. Nobody is willing to make big aggressive bets on the future. We are a well-endowed nation that is content to be defensive in our thinking, in part due to (previously) secure access to a large market south of the border. I’ve met so many smart Canadians who are excited to design chips for American companies with no Canadian company bold enough to go to a fabricator with our own designs. Compute infrastructure is arguably the right long term strategy as it is likely that not only it will create higher quality jobs here, it also builds upon a natural advantage of energy sufficiency. There is also the possibility that we will make our own chips some day. And doing so keeps the app revenue from adoption of AI in the country, instead of going to countries that host AI and compute infrastructure.

The diffusion of AI will be essential to close the productivity gap. Healthcare empowered by responsible AI, AI in manufacturing, AI supported law, Environmental stewardship powered with AI, greater agricultural outcomes through AI and so on. We all use AI without "seeing" the ones and zeros. Let's imagine those new uses and accelerate adoption.

Kiyomi Harrington

Storyteller | 20+ years Tech Media Relations | 9+ years in #AI Comms & Head of Social Media| | SaaS marketer | Ghost Writer | Content & Influencer Marketer |ex. Coveo | ex. Axonify | ex. BlackBerry

9mo

Applied AI is where Canadian companies can absolutely win, but we need to adopt this technology quicker. At Coveo (based in QC), 98% of the revenue is from outside this country...that's very telling.

Elias Puurunen

Corporate virtual & hybrid event producer, NDI & live production software developer, and am the author of Memorable, Profitable, Virtual. Founder of Tractus Events.

9mo

It's so frustrating. Given our Computer Science background (UW), our country's history of blessing the world with the infrastructure needed to run the modern world (Nortel's switches, RIM giving us the smartphone), we should be undisputed leaders in AI infrastructure. Imagine the jobs, opportunities, and impact on our GDP it would have if we got into this game.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories