Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wyoming Case Commentaries

Unjust Enrichment Survives the Statute of Frauds in Wyoming, but Requires Contemporaneous Notice of Expected Repayment

Unjust Enrichment Survives the Statute of Frauds in Wyoming, but Requires Contemporaneous Notice of Expected Repayment

Date: May 24, 2026
Unjust Enrichment Survives the Statute of Frauds in Wyoming, but Requires Contemporaneous Notice of Expected Repayment 1. Introduction James Tallichet v. Jackson Hole Community Radio, Inc. (a/k/a...
Pinegar: Voir Dire Judicial-Misconduct Claims Require Actual Prejudice; Targeted Threats Can Satisfy § 6-2-505 “Reckless Disregard of Evacuation”

Pinegar: Voir Dire Judicial-Misconduct Claims Require Actual Prejudice; Targeted Threats Can Satisfy § 6-2-505 “Reckless Disregard of Evacuation”

Date: May 22, 2026
Pinegar: Voir Dire Judicial-Misconduct Claims Require Actual Prejudice; Targeted Threats Can Satisfy § 6-2-505 “Reckless Disregard of Evacuation” 1. Introduction In Byron W. Pinegar, Jr., v. The...
Constitutional Challenge Alone Does Not Establish Irreparable Harm: Wyoming Requires a Personal and Particularized Injury for Preliminary Injunctions

Constitutional Challenge Alone Does Not Establish Irreparable Harm: Wyoming Requires a Personal and Particularized Injury for Preliminary Injunctions

Date: May 20, 2026
Constitutional Challenge Alone Does Not Establish Irreparable Harm: Wyoming Requires a Personal and Particularized Injury for Preliminary Injunctions Megan Degenfelder, In Her Official Capacity as...
Personal and Particularized Irreparable Harm Required to Preliminarily Enjoin a Statute (Even in Facial Constitutional Challenges)

Personal and Particularized Irreparable Harm Required to Preliminarily Enjoin a Statute (Even in Facial Constitutional Challenges)

Date: May 19, 2026
Personal and Particularized Irreparable Harm Required to Preliminarily Enjoin a Statute (Even in Facial Constitutional Challenges) Case: Megan Degenfelder, et al. v. Wyoming Education Association, et...
Summary Affirmance for Noncompliant Appellate Briefing and Inadequate Record—Including Pro Se Appeals from Arbitration Orders

Summary Affirmance for Noncompliant Appellate Briefing and Inadequate Record—Including Pro Se Appeals from Arbitration Orders

Date: May 19, 2026
Summary Affirmance for Noncompliant Appellate Briefing and Inadequate Record—Including Pro Se Appeals from Arbitration Orders 1. Introduction Victorine O'Donoghue v. Jim Vito Construction, Inc., and...
Equitable Partition of Personal Property in Wyoming & District Court Jurisdiction over Partition Actions

Equitable Partition of Personal Property in Wyoming & District Court Jurisdiction over Partition Actions

Date: May 8, 2026
Equitable Partition of Personal Property in Wyoming & District Court Jurisdiction over Partition Actions I. Introduction In Richard Q. Navarro v. Antonio Oros-Garcia, 2026 WY 52, the Wyoming Supreme...
Unobjected Victim Impact Allegations of Uncharged Misconduct Are Not Plain Error Absent Proof of Inaccuracy and Sentencing Reliance (Atkinson v. State)

Unobjected Victim Impact Allegations of Uncharged Misconduct Are Not Plain Error Absent Proof of Inaccuracy and Sentencing Reliance (Atkinson v. State)

Date: May 7, 2026
Unobjected Victim Impact Allegations of Uncharged Misconduct Are Not Plain Error Absent Proof of Inaccuracy and Sentencing Reliance Introduction In Andrew Atkinson v. The State of Wyoming, 2026 WY 51...
Contractual Silence on Contingency-Fee Bonus Credit Is Not Ambiguity; Wage Claimant Must Prove an Agreed Bonus Rate

Contractual Silence on Contingency-Fee Bonus Credit Is Not Ambiguity; Wage Claimant Must Prove an Agreed Bonus Rate

Date: May 5, 2026
Contractual Silence on Contingency-Fee Bonus Credit Is Not Ambiguity; Wage Claimant Must Prove an Agreed Bonus Rate Introduction In Dino Moncecchi v. Mckellar, Tiedeken & Scoggin, LLC, 2026 WY 50...
Protective-Order Violations and Repeated Surveillance Can Establish Specific Intent for Felony Stalking in Wyoming

Protective-Order Violations and Repeated Surveillance Can Establish Specific Intent for Felony Stalking in Wyoming

Date: May 5, 2026
Protective-Order Violations and Repeated Surveillance Can Establish Specific Intent for Felony Stalking in Wyoming Introduction In Brent Douglas Gayman v. The State of Wyoming, 2026 WY 49, the...
Three-Year Suspension for Knowing Client Neglect and Failure to Comply with Disciplinary Probation

Three-Year Suspension for Knowing Client Neglect and Failure to Comply with Disciplinary Probation

Date: Apr 30, 2026
Three-Year Suspension for Knowing Client Neglect and Failure to Comply with Disciplinary Probation Introduction In Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Vaughn H. Neubauer, 2026...
Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification

Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification 1. Introduction In the Interest Of: AG, minor child concerns whether a juvenile court may change a...
Wyoming Governmental Claims Act: Courts Must Cap Judgments at the Statutory Waiver Limit Absent Proven Excess Insurance, and County Hospitals Do Not Forfeit the Cap by Operating Statewide Commercially

Wyoming Governmental Claims Act: Courts Must Cap Judgments at the Statutory Waiver Limit Absent Proven Excess Insurance, and County Hospitals Do Not Forfeit the Cap by Operating Statewide Commercially

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Wyoming Governmental Claims Act: Courts Must Cap Judgments at the Statutory Waiver Limit Absent Proven Excess Insurance, and County Hospitals Do Not Forfeit the Cap by Operating Statewide...
WGCA Rule: County Hospital Malpractice Judgments Must Be Capped at $1 Million Absent Excess Insurance

WGCA Rule: County Hospital Malpractice Judgments Must Be Capped at $1 Million Absent Excess Insurance

Date: Apr 24, 2026
WGCA Rule: County Hospital Malpractice Judgments Must Be Capped at $1 Million Absent Excess Insurance Introduction In Memorial Hospital of Converse County - Advanced Medicine, Hometown Care and...
Pro Se Custody Appeals Must Present Cogent Argument and Record Citations; Temporary Custody Disputes Become Moot After Final Modification

Pro Se Custody Appeals Must Present Cogent Argument and Record Citations; Temporary Custody Disputes Become Moot After Final Modification

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pro Se Custody Appeals Must Present Cogent Argument and Record Citations; Temporary Custody Disputes Become Moot After Final Modification 1. Introduction Nurian E. Duncan (Mother) appealed from a...
Motorized Vehicles Are Per Se “Deadly Weapons” Under Wyo. Stat. § 6-1-104(a)(iv); No “Serious Bodily Injury” Instruction Required

Motorized Vehicles Are Per Se “Deadly Weapons” Under Wyo. Stat. § 6-1-104(a)(iv); No “Serious Bodily Injury” Instruction Required

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Motorized Vehicles Are Per Se “Deadly Weapons” Under Wyo. Stat. § 6-1-104(a)(iv); No “Serious Bodily Injury” Instruction Required Case: Susanne Jacqueline Mayeux v. The State of Wyoming (2026 WY 43)...
Bad-Faith Use of a “First Right of Purchase” Can Constitute Tortious Interference; Tender at Closing Is Excused When Seller Cannot Perform; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Survive Due-Process Review

Bad-Faith Use of a “First Right of Purchase” Can Constitute Tortious Interference; Tender at Closing Is Excused When Seller Cannot Perform; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Survive Due-Process Review

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Bad-Faith Use of a “First Right of Purchase” Can Constitute Tortious Interference; Tender at Closing Is Excused When Seller Cannot Perform; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Survive Due-Process Review...
Buyer’s Tender Is Excused When Seller Cannot Close; Bad-Faith Assertion of an Expired Right of First Purchase Can Be Tortious Interference; Fee-Based Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Buyer’s Tender Is Excused When Seller Cannot Close; Bad-Faith Assertion of an Expired Right of First Purchase Can Be Tortious Interference; Fee-Based Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Buyer’s Tender Is Excused When Seller Cannot Close; Bad-Faith Assertion of an Expired Right of First Purchase Can Be Tortious Interference; Fee-Based Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio 1....
Wyoming: Tender Excused and Tortious Interference Found Where an Expired Right of First Purchase Is Used to Obstruct Closing; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Upheld Without a 1:1 Ratio

Wyoming: Tender Excused and Tortious Interference Found Where an Expired Right of First Purchase Is Used to Obstruct Closing; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Upheld Without a 1:1 Ratio

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Wyoming: Tender Excused and Tortious Interference Found Where an Expired Right of First Purchase Is Used to Obstruct Closing; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Upheld Without a 1:1 Ratio Introduction In...
Bad-Faith Use of a First Right of Purchase Can Create Tort Liability and Excuse Tender; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Bad-Faith Use of a First Right of Purchase Can Create Tort Liability and Excuse Tender; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Bad-Faith Use of a First Right of Purchase Can Create Tort Liability and Excuse Tender; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio Case: Wyoming Fall Creek, LLC, a Wyoming Limited...
No Post-Docket “Clarification” Without Supreme Court Leave: Rule 60(a) Limits, Non-Recurring Business Distributions in Imputed Income, and Double-Counting Errors in Divorce Valuation

No Post-Docket “Clarification” Without Supreme Court Leave: Rule 60(a) Limits, Non-Recurring Business Distributions in Imputed Income, and Double-Counting Errors in Divorce Valuation

Date: Apr 17, 2026
No Post-Docket “Clarification” Without Supreme Court Leave: Rule 60(a) Limits, Non-Recurring Business Distributions in Imputed Income, and Double-Counting Errors in Divorce Valuation Introduction...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert