Key research themes
1. What are the universal mechanisms for repairing communication problems across diverse languages?
This research area investigates the existence of universal, cross-linguistic systems that enable interlocutors to detect and resolve communication breakdowns in real-time during conversations. Understanding such mechanisms is crucial for revealing the cooperative nature of human communication and informing theories about language universals and pragmatic interactions.
2. What are the key barriers to effective communication within educational and organizational settings, and how can they be mitigated?
This theme addresses communication obstacles experienced in institutional environments such as classrooms, universities, and workplaces, focusing on linguistic, psychological, emotional, cultural, and structural barriers. Understanding these impediments offers actionable insights for developing training, policies, and technological interventions that improve communication efficacy and organizational performance.
3. How do communication difficulties impact healthcare delivery for patients with communication disorders, and what strategies can healthcare professionals employ to address these challenges?
This theme explores communication challenges faced by healthcare students and providers when interacting with adults who have communication disorders, such as those arising from neurological conditions. Understanding these difficulties is essential to improve patient safety, treatment compliance, and health outcomes, and it informs curricular enhancements and clinical practices focusing on accessibility and patient-centered communication.









































![Note. Significant regression weights are bold. anger dysregulation predicting reactive externalizing problems Mediating role of emotional competence in the relation of communication problems and externalizing problems The third aim was to examine whether the relations between externalizing problems and communication problems were mediated by children’s emotional competence (Figure 1). First, we examined the direct path of communication problems to externalizing problems. We reran the best fitting models as described above excluding children with missing data on the CCC or CAM. Then the severity of communication problems (general [structural language and pragmatic scales combined], or pragmatic and emotion communication), as well as the interaction effects with diagnosis, were added to the model. 2 ¥ Sa: 1! wees oe ae ee eee peas cq: The third aim was to examine whether the relations between externalizing problems and iigher levels of reactive aggression, but not proactive aggression. Growth in emotional](https://figures.academia-assets.com/120329946/table_034.jpg)













![externalizing strategies, with significant predictors made bold. Approach and avoidant strategies of children with DLD were also not related to any of the CCC-2 scales. However, semantic problems were related to higher levels of worry (AJC without: 290.7, and with semantic problems: 285.0**; B = .07, 95% CI [.02 to .13]) and externalizing strategies (AJC without: 205.8, and with semantic problems: 201.6**, B = .05, 95% CI [.01 to .10]). Finally, more pragmatic problems contributed to the prediction of more externalizing strategies in children with DLD (4/C without: 205.8, and with pragmatic problems: 200.0**; B= .01 95% CT[.00 to .02]).](https://figures.academia-assets.com/120329946/table_030.jpg)
