Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

There are two questions regarding Omniglot.

Question 1: Is Omniglot a reliable source?

• Option Q1.1: Generally reliable for factual information
• Option Q1.2: Unclear or additional considerations apply
• Option Q1.3: Generally unreliable for factual information
• Option Q1.4: Unreliable to the point that it should be deprecated

Question 2: Should it be listed on WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources? Per discussion below, this question may be irrelevant; conclusion of this RfC would warrant listing regardless.

• Option Q2.1: Yes, it should be listed in the table under whichever Q1 option has consensus
• Option Q2.2: No, it does not need to be listed in the table
• Option Q2.3: Defer, either unsure or should wait

~ oklopfer (💬) 01:09, 28 April 2026 (UTC)