Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanisha Singh (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tanisha Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recipient of run-of-the-mill non-notable awards with no reliable sources to back them up. The sources given are either not significantly about the article subject, not independent, or not reliable. GSS 💬 08:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS 💬 08:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GSS 💬 08:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS 💬 08:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per GSS. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 12:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep - let's just agree that the formatting is terrible. On the other hand, her Item songs have gotten attention. Bearian (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Bearian: got attention, but unfortunately not in reliable sources. GSS 💬 17:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- I see four India Times articles, which I believe is the gold standard for media coverage in that nation. Bearian (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- The first one in the list sound like about someone else's wedding, and rest does not satsfy WP:SIGCOV and mostly talk about the same topic. P.S. Indian media is known for writing this kind of promotional fluff piece. GSS 💬 18:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- I see four India Times articles, which I believe is the gold standard for media coverage in that nation. Bearian (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Bearian: got attention, but unfortunately not in reliable sources. GSS 💬 17:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see that she has had significant roles in multiple notable productions - of the three blue linked films, two say she had a "Special apperience" (and the IMDB entries say exactly the same thing, with the same spelling - no info about what these "Special apperiences" were). In the third blue linked film, IMDB has her as a 'lyricist'. I don't see anything in reliable sources about her songs, either. Several news reports (in the article, and others) say things like "has done some small roles" [1], "Another small time actor" [2], "Wannabe actress" [3]. Admittedly, they were from 2014, in reports of her wearing dresses made of meat or roses or stripping for Rahul Gandhi, but I don't see anything more recent, apart from attending the non-notable Bright Awards or the probably non-notable Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Nobel/Noble Awards. And this coverage is not significant enough (or independent -often quotes from her, her mother, etc) to meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC, either. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:20, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.