Special:Diff/1160756892

edit

lol, what an edit summary.  MJLTalk 17:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! In case it's not obvious, it's in reference to this discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 23:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Clan Abercromby

edit

Is there anything potentially salvageable from the page you deleted (created by banned user) at Clan Abercromby? If it's not 100% trash, would love to have it reconstititued at User:SMcCandlish/Incubator/Clan Abercromby.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  16:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@SMcCandlish:   Done. -- Tavix (talk) 17:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thankee.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  17:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Creating Page "Electronic Music Festivals"

edit

Hi, I am going to recreate the page Electronic Music Festivals but since you had previously deleted it, Wikipedia suggested that I check with you first. AriTheHorse 02:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, things changed. AriTheHorse 02:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Redirects for discussion: 🫗

edit

Hey mate, just wanted to let you know that is discussion was relisted, so I was seeing if you wanted to chime in. Hopefully this should be the last one. Enix150 (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editor experience invitation

edit

Hi Tavix. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

ANI re Hey man im josh

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You have been mentioned at the ANI report regarding User:Hey man im josh. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

For reference, this is the discussion at time of closure. -- Tavix (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A Redirect Barnstar for you!

edit
  The Redirect Barnstar
Thank you for all the work that you do at RfD. Your comments have changed my mind and helped to educate me on numerous occasions. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Template:R from subtitle" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Template:R from subtitle has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 4 § Template:R from subtitle until a consensus is reached.

(Notifying you as you participated in a previous discussion at Template talk:R from subtitle.) All the best. ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 10:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Portland Duffs has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Portland Duffs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 12:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Preethi (name) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Preethi (name) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preethi (name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jax 0677 (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Update

edit

I finally finished your List of NFL players that you started in 2015. I've been working on it on-and-off since 2016. Now that all of the names are disambiguated and referenced, I am wondering if there is some way to automatically generate the team lists with as little fuss as possible? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wow, I had forgotten about that project! Nice work! The list I was using does not sort by team, and I'm not aware of a way to automatically generate team lists. -- Tavix (talk) 17:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
At PFR, scroll down to "Frivolities" and click on Players who played for multiple teams. If you enter the same team twice, it generates an all-time roster. For example, here is the list of Arizona Cardinals players. Click "All Players" at that link to see the list (2101 players). There is also a "share & export" button for Excel and stuff.
So basicallly, I am wondering if there is a way to generate a list of Cardinals players on-wiki based off of linking the PFR URLs up to the URLs at our master list (List of NFL players). Thoughts? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Since there's Excel export, you could export it and use Excel to format it for Wikipedia. I wouldn't know how to link to PFR URLs automatically though. -- Tavix (talk) 20:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Tavix. I actually have already figured out a way of doing it. I use LinkClipper to extract URLs from a team's all-time roster from PFR, and then I use conditional formatting to highlight duplicate URLs in my master Excel sheet of wiki-linked NFL players. It doesn't take too long. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

edit

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Emailconfirmed Users deleted by some reason

edit

i dont know really why Wikipedia:Emailconfirmed Users was deleted. i just want to read that page but it was deleted. PLEASE TELL ME WHY WAS DELETED Tresspasing (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_29#Wikipedia:Emailconfirmed_users. --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
so it moved to another page? Tresspasing (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. Like it says in the link I provided, it was deleted. "The result of the discussion was speedy deleted."

"Kattie" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Kattie has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21 § Kattie until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Andrew Gower (programmer)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Andrew Gower (programmer) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 25 § Andrew Gower (programmer) until a consensus is reached. — Hubcapp (talk) 19:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays

edit

Cremastra ‹ uc › 20:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Garbage Compactor 3263827

edit

Hi, thanks for finding a good way to delete the redirect without losing the attribution. Nyttend (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit

I’m not going to be using this account anymore so I’d like it blocked, since it’s more of a security risk than anything else. And yes, I’ve learned my lesson. Thanks, Prahlad balaji (talk) 00:05, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm happy to hear that you've learned your lesson and I hope to see you around contributing constructively. I decline to block your account though, I'm philosophically opposed to self-requested blocks. If you feel there's a security risk and no longer wish to log in, scramble your password with a very long string of random characters. -- Tavix (talk) 15:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Done, thanks. Prahlad balaji (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail!

edit
 
Hello, Tavix. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 06:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Plant🌱man (talk) 06:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Good morning!

edit

Just pinging both of you saying I was thinking of you guys this morning. Doug Weller tells us he is getting 13,000 steps a day. Makes me feel I'm just not making much of an effort. BusterD (talk) 11:17, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reaching out, I'm doing well. I appreciate you taking on this project on—I'm tired of the drama and I'm tired of seeing junk that RfD can deal with dumped onto AfD. I'm hopeful that at least one of these issues can be resolved soon. -- Tavix (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Knowing how much effort I have to make just to keep up, I have a lot of respect for the admins who protected the pedia while I was a clueless newbie. Relax; I'm not going to ask you guys anything today. But expect a daily touch from me while we sort this out. I've got some reading to do so I have a background on the disagreement. We'll talk more on the merits tomorrow. Enjoy one full day not thinking about it. BusterD (talk) 15:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Will do! Thanks again. -- Tavix (talk) 15:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm not delaying this intentionally. I've been unexpected tied up with family stuff. I'll be back this eve and tomorrow. BusterD (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Knowledge Graph

edit

You're absolutely right at Special:Diff/1288040012, I think I was looking at an old page and failed to refresh. Will be more careful about this from now on. Rusalkii (talk) 01:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I figured that's what happened. No worries, I appreciate your help! -- Tavix (talk) 13:10, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Trioxin

edit

You was wrong to close the discussion, User:Anonrfjwhuikdzz too said delete the redirect. 109.54.243.101 (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I ask to reopen the discussion for reach a more clear consensus

WP:NOTAVOTE. Your IP addresses should have been blocked at the time due to the disruption you caused in the first discussion. Opening two more discussions after all this was explained is even more disruptive, and now you don't have the benefit of ignorance. I will now be blocking. -- Tavix (talk) 13:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of largest Europe-based law firms by revenue for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of largest Europe-based law firms by revenue, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest Europe-based law firms by revenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Deletion review for Battle of Vinland

edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Battle of Vinland. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Snævar (talk) 00:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

"CAT:BLP" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect CAT:BLP has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 26 § CAT:BLP until a consensus is reached. RaschenTechner (talk) 11:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Guide to temporary accounts

edit

Hello, Tavix. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options →   Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply