Talk:Tax
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Consarn in topic "Revenue enhancement" listed at Redirects for discussion
 | Tax was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be framed as "anti-tax" vs "pro-tax"
editThat's how the 'economic effects' section appears to be organized. The article should simply document what credible economic research says about taxes. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 10:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Alternative minimum tax
editShould we have an alternative tax? WikiGrower1 (talk) 23:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- I mean should we have alternative minimum tax in the article WikiGrower1 (talk) 23:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- I think that it is too much detail and WP:UNDUE to add it to this overview article, since it is basically another way to calculate income tax for a minority of taxpayers in one songle country. It is explained in Taxation in the United States, so it is not like Wikipedia lacks information about the concept. Sjö (talk) 05:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
"Revenue enhancement" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Revenue enhancement has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 8 § Revenue enhancement until a consensus is reached. consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 13:13, 8 May 2026 (UTC)