Talk:Deglobalization

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Deglobalization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130602072723/http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/media/filer_public/2013/03/25/press_release_2012_en.pdf to http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/media/filer_public/2013/03/25/press_release_2012_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deglobalization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120806135758/http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t41t42+22+1++(41)%20%20AND%2 to http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t41t42+22+1++(41)%20%20AND%2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

external references

Response to Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Deglobalization. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2018 (UTC)" Thanks! Your critical comments are highly appreciated. This page has for very very long carried the "This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2007)". I would like to clarify what I have done and why. I have provided citations for verification and data (produced a graph) for verification that substantiated what was written by other people before. I cannot imagine that this is controversial. I have also updated the assessments of deglobalization. This is done on the basis of a recent issue of CJRES which containes only peer reviewed material. I am a contributor to that issue but I have not been involved in the design or editorial process anyhow. The fact that peer reviewed material is now available and that data have become available recently triggered my editing and updating. As you will see there are also references to opposing views. I will get rid of all citations that are unnecessary, in particular if this is to my own work (but I cannot help that I am one of the specialists) and keep updating this item in light of new literature. In my view that is good for wikipedia and your continued scrutiny will be appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter a.g. van bergeijk (talk • contribs) 09:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Peter a.g. van bergeijk (talk) 09:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed addition to the "International political economy of deglobalization" section

I propose adding the following sentence(s) at the end of the section, after the paragraph that discusses Walden Bello and the Buy American Act:

"Recent scholarship frames deglobalization as both a process—the outgrowth of prior hyper-globalization's contradictions—and a project pursued by states to redraw rules and boundaries among 'insiders' and 'outsiders'; it argues that the erosion of trust among major powers has securitized formerly economic ties and is shifting the center of governance away from global institutions toward competing 'Worlds'. Some scholars further describe the shift as spanning three pillars—geopolitics, the international political economy, and meaning systems—whose simultaneous strain can reinforce one another."

Rationale: Neutral summary of a scholarly perspective linking deglobalization to state-led rule-redrawing and to a three-pillar framework. Per WP:COI, posting here for review and consensus. 212.125.10.53 (talk) 11:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for noting your conflict of interest here. But there is no point doing so and then four minutes later simply adding the content to the article yourself. You need to wait for others to review and determine if there is consensus for adding this. My own perspective is that this seems like an attempt to shoehorn a particular writer's recent paper (yours?) into the article rather than a genuine attempt to improve the article itself. Melcous (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder about WP:COI and the timing. I was already working on this topic and, being at my computer, I could quickly paste language from an ongoing draft; nevertheless, you're right that I shouldn't have added it live. I won't re-add it. Instead, I'm proposing the wording below via {{request edit}} and will wait for consensus.

This is a developing literature. To avoid single-source generalization and weasel wording, the draft (a) summarizes well-cited work on the securitization/fragmentation of economic ties with multiple reliable sources (Farrell & Newman 2019; IMF 2023; WTO 2023), and (b) clearly attributes Okur's perspective by name. If editors prefer, this can be trimmed further, but I believe the article benefits from noting the broader trend with multiple RS and then attributing the specific "Worlds" framing.

Addition to "International political economy of deglobalization"

Analysts describe how states increasingly "weaponize interdependence" and how policy-driven geoeconomic fragmentation risks shifting coordination away from universal rules toward more bloc-oriented arrangements. Within this debate, political scientist Mehmet Akif Okur argues that deglobalization is both a process and a state-led project to redraw insider/outsider boundaries, with movement toward competing "Worlds." 212.125.10.53 (talk) 21:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

References

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 00:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

It is good peace and derves to be adde to main article. ~2025-32746-39 (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Can I edit the page with this text? Any objections? ~2025-32746-39 (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC)