Talk:Amercement
Latest comment: 6 years ago by DanTrent in topic Modern usage (asset forfeiture)–especially Canadian/non-U.S.
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editPerhaps this belongs in Wiktionary. Edison 01:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- If it's good enough for EB, then its good enough for here. —Xezbeth 17:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Funny language
editAdorable, crispy, old-fashioned language abounds on Wikipedia English law articles. 178.38.88.9 (talk) 08:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Modern usage (asset forfeiture)–especially Canadian/non-U.S.
editDoes the section on modern usage belong here? or would the article on Asset Forfeiture be a better fit? Specifically, as far as I can ascertain, the Canadian section (the only non-U.S. subsection for modern usage) covers similar ground as the U.S. section but there may not be any explicit reference in Canadian law to civil forfeiture as "amercement". But the article Asset Forfeiture seems to have the same focus with somewhat broader geographic coverage. --DanTrent (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)