An explosive device went off near a polling place, but voting was not affected and few other issues were reported.

The Macomb County clerk and GOP candidate for secretary of state bypassed the Michigan Department of State to gain access to a federal database of noncitizens.

The Trump-aligned former county clerk had been convicted for helping to breach her own county’s election systems.

Polls show a sizable chunk of Americans buy into Trump’s claims of fraud, but they’re more worried about eligible voters getting disenfranchised.

Navajo County Recorder David Marshall, a former state legislator, faces allegations that he isn’t eligible to hold his new post under a long-disputed section of the Arizona Constitution.

Despite some mail ballot mixups, the state’s primary has been largely without issue so far.

Federal agents have contacted Wisconsin election officials as part of a broader review apparently tied to the 2020 election.

The lawsuit alleges that it would be illegal to disenfranchise properly cast votes over election officials’ errors.

The program did not get enough buy-in from counties, and there are still technical details that need to be worked out.

The ruling creates uncertainty for election officials concerned about preserving voters’ privacy.

Last-minute redistricting is forcing primaries to be rescheduled and confusing voters, while implementation of Trump’s mail-voting executive order is up in the air.

Jocelyn Benson’s plan largely focuses on ensuring she doesn’t get special access to information before it’s public.

Officials say ballots are being unfairly tossed because of administrative error, while clerks criticize the state for giving little guidance before reversing course.

Municipal clerks are now preparing for the department’s next move.

The city included five ballots to comply with a state ruling but hasn’t committed to following the standard going forward.

Officials removed 23 late-arriving ballots as ordered, but had to choose some to randomly discard most because they couldn’t identify most of the late ballots.

The ruling weakened a key Voting Rights Act provision that’s driven change to election systems and local district boundaries across the state for decades.

The section of the act that the Supreme Court weakened changed how Texas drew its political maps and empowered voters and candidates of color.