Avatar

This is the beginning (constantly)

@vibrantshadow / vibrantshadow.tumblr.com

A goofy ah blog where I usually just post about my interests and sometimes other things. Autistic and Bisexual😎

New Pinned Post:

Felt like making a new pinned post because the old one was too wordy.

Sideblogs:

@vibrantshadowsth Sonic the Hedgehog

@vibrantshadowmlp My Little Pony, less active than the other two

@vibrantshadowbd Blue Dragon, most active on

DNI:

  • Ableist
  • LGBT+phobic
  • Racist
  • Xenophobic
  • Islamophobic
  • Basically every other type of discrimination that exists
  • Pedophiles
  • Abusers of any kind (physical, sexual, mental, emotional and neglectful)

Extra info:

  • English
  • Female
  • Pansexual
  • Probably Autistic but I haven't had a formal diagnosis yet (I support self-diagnosis)
  • 21 years old

Hashtag meanings:

#special interest post = a post related to something that is currently a spin/hyperfixation

#important = something serious

#funny = self-explanatory

#self post = post I made

#self reblog = post I made that I reblogged

If you would like to look at my old pinned post, go to #old pinned post

Avatar
Reblogged

Just posting the creature compendiums of the four demon kings and Szabo in case you want to see them without having to face off against them again or if you never got the chance to use the compendium on them, Mai is my favourite Demon king! 🤖🌪⚔️

Okay so from what I'm getting here...

1) Ku could be the second in command of the Demon Kings

2) The Demon Kings aren't programmed to immediately know all their attacks/moves and have to learn them manually

3) Basically foreshadowing for Szabo's redemption arc

4) Some evidence that Nene created the Creature Compendium

5) Nothing of note here

Avatar
Reblogged

Another one of TADC's biggest problems is that it's not what it presented itself as.

At the beginning, we were introduced to six main characters, with Pomni being the most central of them - we entered this world through her perspective. So, naturally, many of us assumed that all six characters would receive focus and development over time; episode 4, which centered on Gangle, seemed to reinforce this expectation.

However after that, the show became more and more centered around Jax. We kept waiting for episodes that would give characters like Ragatha more attention, only to get more Jax. Then, when people criticized this imbalance, the response was essentially that Actually! Jax, alongside Pomni, is the central main character too. If TADC had been marketed from the start as a story primarily about Pomni and Jax, many viewers would have approached it with different expectations. Some people would have been completely fine with that. Others, myself included, might have realized earlier that the show simply wasn't what we were looking for. I wouldn't have been so disappointed! The only group who is happy with this situation is people who like Jax.

We started watching "The Amazing Digital Circus" and ended up with "Jax and Pomni show". Of course many people are upset; we were told to expect an ensemble cast and then told later that those expectations were wrong.

ough.

Avatar
Reblogged

Analyzing TADC's Cast Psychology Based On Their Designs

With Episode 8 confirming that the cast's bodies are reflections of their minds at the moment they put on the headset, I thought it'd be fun to dig into what that tells us about each character's psychology.

Firstly, it's important to note I'm going to be basing this analysis off a few assumptions:

1. The mind-to-body program uses people's conscious identity as a baseline. Nobody's bodies reflect who they truly are, instead they seem closer to how each person perceives themselves, meaning their bodies tend to reflect a lot of insecurities.

2. The mind-to-body program is flawed. This is obvious, as nobody actually LIKES their bodies. Specifically, the program seems unable to differentiate negative and positive ideas of the self.

3. The mind-to-body program uses a snapshot. Again, it doesn't encapsulate all of who someone is, only who they feel they are at the moment they put on the headset. This is important, because our identities are quite fluid, and tend to change based on external circumstances.

4. This was all written off-the-cuff, meaning I'm likely overlooking some important details. Please share your own insights in the comments!

With all that out of the way, here's my read on the "snapshot" the program took of each character's mind:

Jax

A cartoon rabbit who lies through his teeth. I think the most notable detail in Jax's design is that his mind is physically incapable of opening most of the time. He cannot "open up," and the few exceptions to this are moments of instinctive expression, such as when he's laughing, screaming, or choking. I said "lies through his teeth" because I think that's Jax's default state, or more accurately, that's what Jax FEELS like he's doing most of the time. Next there's his connections to Bugs Bunny and Cheshire Cat, two witty tricksters who are smarter than everyone else and toy with people. This is who Jax thinks he is, however an important distinction to note is that characters like Bugs only work because they never initiate conflict, they only defend themselves from bullies in clever ways. There's significant meaning in that. Jax's mind manifested as a sarcastic prey animal who's constantly fending off bullies.

Pomni

Pomni manifested as a diminutive jester, which I think signifies she spent a lot of her life feeling small, and like nobody took her seriously. This aligns with how she likely put on the headset while recording footage for a YouTube video that nobody would watch. Her large, intensely expressive eyes reflect her emotional openness, and her notably coherent and human-like design compared to everyone else aligns with her relative emotional stability. Notably, her body seems to be made of rubber. It's quick to distort in expressive ways when stretched or impacted, but is also highly durable and always snaps back to its default shape. It's a testament to her resilience and sense of self that her body is the ONLY one Caine can't physically disassemble.

Ragatha

A soft, spineless ragdoll that's been damaged and repaired many times. Ragatha is the most blatantly toy-like of anyone within the circus, and that means a lot. A ragdoll can be comforting, but is no replacement for a real friend. It's a plaything designed for children to dress up, project their feelings on, and eventually discard. Most significantly, ragdolls are traditionally fashioned out of old rags that have outlived their purpose, and are meant to be easily repaired when they inevitably take a beating. A "well loved" ragdoll is one that's been repeatedly torn and repaired over years of play. All this paints Ragatha as someone who lives for others while fundamentally devaluing herself. She's easily cut into or torn, but that's ok because she isn't made of anything valuable, and those wounds can be quickly patched over. She is something to be used, and if she isn't being used, she's a failure. I'm not sure it's possible to create a better physical metaphor for the mindset of an abuse victim, right down to her button resembling a black eye.

Zooble

Zooble's body is perhaps the easiest to read of anyone within the circus, as it's their relationship with their body that defines their insecurities. What I find especially interesting though is the way Caine's program seems to have struggled to interpret the unique neurology of a gender-fluid mind, which would have been quite confusing to something made by a static AI like Caine. Were Zooble simply nonbinary, the program would have had a definitive identity to draw from, however because Zooble's sense of self keeps shifting between male, female, and neither/both, the program seems to have ended up latching on to the only constant between these forms: Zooble never feeling QUITE comfortable within their body. Thus it gave her a form that is always changing, but eternally awkward to pilot. His face being limited to just a set of mismatched eyes is also significant, because he often hides his feelings within an abrasive exterior. It takes quite a bit for them to be vulnerable with others, and it's only though helping Gangle that they're able to come to terms with their own insecurities, and eventually open up enough to let Gangle help them back. And of course, the colourful and eye-catching nature of his body suggests Zooble was someone who considered herself difficult to ignore, which aligns with the sorts of social, expressive professions we know they had.

Gangle

Gangle's mask gimmick being baked into her avatar suggests she suffers from an emotional regulation disorder, but that's already been made clear by the show. Her body is notably the most intangible and flimsy of anyone we see within the circus, which aligns with her quiet and unassertive nature. Most interestingly, her body has the capacity to form a wide variety of shapes, which we see her use in expressive ways on those rare occasions when she's feeling confident enough to assert herself. This, coupled with her drama mask motif and her interest in art makes me think Gangle is someone who quietly dreams of being someone important and attention-grabbing, but lacks the confidence to place herself in any such position. This is supported by the way any degree of power or control tends to immediately go to her head. It's what she wants, but she's so unused to having it that she quickly gets carried away and is ultimately left feeling hollow and unworthy. Lastly, I wasn't sure where else to mention this, but Gangle and Zooble being the only two cast members without clothes feels significant to me. I think it suggests either that clothing played little importance in their identities, or that neither one had clothes that they particularly identified with, be it due to Zooble's fluid nature or Gangle's lack of self confidence. Or perhaps they were closeted nudists and I've uncovered the show's deepest lore. Who can say?

Kinger

Note, my observations regarding Kinger are directed at who he eas when he first entered the Circus some 20 years before the show's beginning, not who he is by the time Pomni arrives. Kinger's primary feature is how he entered the circus as one half of a whole. He and Queenie's bodies were literally made for each other, to a point where they can only be eye-to-eye with one another due to their wonky facial compositions. This reflects a real phenomenon that occurs within long-time partners, in which their brains gradually structure themselves to act as a single two-part mind. Say, one will remember names while the other remembers dates, or one will manage the pair's physical needs while the other manages the pair's emotional needs. It allows both minds to be more efficient, but comes at the cost of codependency. Should one mind be lost, the other will find itself unbalanced and struggling to function on its own. The fact that Kinger and Queenie's minds were so intertwined that the program gave them matching bodies perfectly encapsulates this, and also makes Queenie's abstraction all the more devastating. Besides this, other more surface-level observations can be seen in how both take the form of leaders, and what their specific pieces suggest about their relationship. The king piece is important but weak on its own, relying on the more powerful and independent queen piece for protection. The fact that they come from either side of the board could suggest they were mental opposites who fit well together. Their floating hands likely signify a degree of mental detachment from the world around them, their intense bloodshot eyes could suggest a degree of shared neurosis, and their lack of any other features could suggest that neither one was particularly social by nature.

“We chose the term “asexual” to describe ourselves because both “celibate” and “anti-sexual” have connotations we wished to avoid: the first implies that one has sacrificed sexuality for some higher good, the second that sexuality is degrading or somehow inherently bad. “Asexual”, as we use it, does not mean “without sex” but “relating sexually to no one”. This does not, of course, exclude masturbation but implies that if one has sexual feelings they do not require another person for their expression. Asexuality is, simply, self-contained sexuality.”

Note the date, people:

That’s 1972

29 years before AVEN was started online,

and 47 years before the present.

And that’s only the date that Manifesto was written, so asexuals as members of a community must have existed at least some time before that.

So, no: we are not just Tumblr trenders. Get out of here with that.

supporting my asexual friends and foes by rebbloging this

It’s 50 years this month since the first version of the Asexual Manifesto was written. Aces have been writing about our experiences under this name for at least half a century. We are not an internet fad.

Avatar
Reblogged

you have fallen for AI before. even if you don’t believe you could ever fall for AI, you very more than likely have at this point. you have scrolled past an AI generated ad not realizing it was AI. you’ve seen a drawing online and thought “oh that looks cool,” not realizing it was not created a person. i’m not saying this to scare you, but i am saying it as a reminder that you are not immune to how realistic AI is becoming