"Oh you are plural, like that guy from Split?"
Oh you are singlet, like that guy from Texas Chainsaw Massacre
idk i feel like a lot — even most — systems i see have not actually stopped believing anti-endo.... is rhetoric the word im looking for here? i cant think of anything else but you know what i mean. and therefor will see themselves as inclusive of all systems but still see cdd (and especially did in particular) systems as what systems are supposed to be like. i also think a lot of people are wildly ableist about cdds, especially in regards to falling into the "if i were more disabled people would take me seriously" fallacy
the "funnier as a system" tag is a great tool for reminding singlets that their super out there what-if scenarios are some people's tuesday. "came back wrong" is a prime example
sure you call yourself pro-endo and say you support all systems but have you like actually unpacked those beliefs. do you actually care about endogenic systems or will you just reblog and say the same things despite thinking of yourself as supportive
are you really supportive of all systems or do you still believe cdd systems are the most important and real systems. or do you still hold cdd systems up as "the right kind of system." or do you still complain about systems who's experiences dont line-up with cdds because you think cdds should be the main focus in PLURAL communities.
you cant just slap "all systems welcome" on your blog while continuing to say anti-endo and anti-non-disordered system bullshit
im saying this both in a "i think a lot of cdd systems need to stop acting like theyre more important than everyone else and like everyone else should cater to them and center their experiences" way and in a "if you arent a cdd system you shouldnt hold them up as your model of plurality" way. saying this as a cdd system btw
what i mean i guess is that even in spaces for ALL plurals and systems, and among people who consider themselves as inclusive and accepting of all systems, cdd systems (especially did systems in particular) are still held up as what a system "should" be like.
sure you call yourself pro-endo and say you support all systems but have you like actually unpacked those beliefs. do you actually care about endogenic systems or will you just reblog and say the same things despite thinking of yourself as supportive
are you really supportive of all systems or do you still believe cdd systems are the most important and real systems. or do you still hold cdd systems up as "the right kind of system." or do you still complain about systems who's experiences dont line-up with cdds because you think cdds should be the main focus in PLURAL communities.
you cant just slap "all systems welcome" on your blog while continuing to say anti-endo and anti-non-disordered system bullshit
im saying this both in a "i think a lot of cdd systems need to stop acting like theyre more important than everyone else and like everyone else should cater to them and center their experiences" way and in a "if you arent a cdd system you shouldnt hold them up as your model of plurality" way. saying this as a cdd system btw
sure you call yourself pro-endo and say you support all systems but have you like actually unpacked those beliefs. do you actually care about endogenic systems or will you just reblog and say the same things despite thinking of yourself as supportive
are you really supportive of all systems or do you still believe cdd systems are the most important and real systems. or do you still hold cdd systems up as "the right kind of system." or do you still complain about systems who's experiences dont line-up with cdds because you think cdds should be the main focus in PLURAL communities.
you cant just slap "all systems welcome" on your blog while continuing to say anti-endo and anti-non-disordered system bullshit
not that cdd systems arent included in plurality, just like. ok so imagine if i, a lesbian, walked into a general queer community and then complained about how there were people who were queer but not lesbians talking about their experiences there because i thought lesbians were the most important
sure you call yourself pro-endo and say you support all systems but have you like actually unpacked those beliefs. do you actually care about endogenic systems or will you just reblog and say the same things despite thinking of yourself as supportive
are you really supportive of all systems or do you still believe cdd systems are the most important and real systems. or do you still hold cdd systems up as "the right kind of system." or do you still complain about systems who's experiences dont line-up with cdds because you think cdds should be the main focus in PLURAL communities.
you cant just slap "all systems welcome" on your blog while continuing to say anti-endo and anti-non-disordered system bullshit
sure you call yourself pro-endo and say you support all systems but have you like actually unpacked those beliefs. do you actually care about endogenic systems or will you just reblog and say the same things despite thinking of yourself as supportive
are you really supportive of all systems or do you still believe cdd systems are the most important and real systems. or do you still hold cdd systems up as "the right kind of system." or do you still complain about systems who's experiences dont line-up with cdds because you think cdds should be the main focus in PLURAL communities.