Avatar

nonbinary jews lead transfeminist dialectics

@ftmtftm

28 • it / its

Pinned

☆ Welcome to my Theory Blog ☆

You can refer to me by my URL and with it / its pronouns.

I am an Intersectional, Decolonialist, Transfeminist and I read and engage with a lot of Black Feminist literature specifically. Radical Feminism and separatist politics are grifts regardless of who is peddling them and I'm highly critical of anyone who endorses them, especially other trans people. MLs fuck off.

I do not answer asks that directly name other Tumblr users or link to posts that are not mine.

If I'm blunt with you it's the autism burnout. Don't hear what I didn't say. [ X ]

FAQ and links under the cut.

I learned in my political science class that all major famines in the 20th century and onward have been caused by oppressive groups or political situations restricting access to food, NOT natural causes like crop failure

This is literally the point that Indian economist Amartya Sen made that won him the Nobel prize in economics. As a child, he survived one of the several Bengal famines that were organised by the British colonisers in India. He developed his theory on famines, which is that they were more about distribution of food rather than production or availability of it

every time someone realizes they dont have to pick between being a boy or a girl an angel gets its wings btw. and also extremely loud cheering can be heard in the distance from me specifically

btw if you've ever wondered why i make posts like this and get really obnoxious about nonbinary positivity. this is why

and for all of yall that are still figuring it out or aren't getting the support you deserve:

I keep getting in trouble for referring to my spouse as 'my woman.' That's who she is to me--wanch ngatharam, and I'm pam nungantam, her man. Apparently that bit of paleo-misogyny loses something in translation for the metro middle-class people I'm attempting to mingle with lately, so I've had to alter my language and start saying 'my spouse.' The problem lies in the cultural baggage that comes with the possessive form in English grammar, and with the language of property law. In our Aboriginal communities, when people first meet you they will often ask, 'Who own you?' This doesn't signify a property relation--it is all about what groups, pairs and lands you belong to in your relationships, which are governed collectively. Belonging and ownership means something completely different from possession in our world. It means being in relation to family and community and place. Your belongings are not your property, but your connections. This worldview is not very compatible with the political economies, legal systems and marketplaces we must interact with to survive.

Tyson Yunkaporta, Right Story, Wrong Story

PSA to fan creators who don't have a lot of regular contact with children: They are almost always bigger than you think. A 1-year-old baby may already be walking. A toddler is likely already hip-high. A 10-year-old may already be taller than at least one of their parents. A 14/15 year old may already have reached their adult height.

Here's the link. It was actually not immediately easy to find, so I thought this might help.

This month people have been tearing Flock cameras off their poles. Perched above public streets, they are birdlike things, weatherproof, and they photograph every passing car and file it in a searchable national database. Somebody cut two of them in half at Washington Avenue and Westcott in Houston, spray-painted the wreckage, and left an American flag on one of them. Police were notified on the morning of the Fourth of July. Somebody severed a camera in Rutherfordton, North Carolina. The police department posted the photograph itself and collected more than twenty thousand comments. “Not all heroes wear capes.” “Give them a medal.” Here is what the cameras do when nobody cuts them down. Cops use them to hunt immigrants and to follow ICE targets across state lines and to find women who ended pregnancies in states where that is a crime and to watch exes and to watch women they want, without a warrant and without a judge. A cop types a reason in a box and the box does not check. A man in Burleson, Texas, told deputies his girlfriend had taken abortion pills. He showed them the photographs, the FedEx envelope, the instructions. Deputies opened a death investigation into a non-viable fetus, and the district attorney told them the state could not charge her, and they searched anyway: 83,345 cameras across 6,809 networks, a month of everywhere she had been. The reason they typed was had an abortion, search for female. The search reached Illinois and Washington, where what she did was legal. They found her in Dallas. She came into the sheriff’s office a week later, and they thought she had come to explain the fetus, and she had come to report that the man who called them had put a gun to her head. A sheriff in Jerome County, Idaho ran his wife’s plate more than seven hundred times in three months. He typed the same reason every time. Test. The attorney general found nothing to charge him with. He retired in April. The Institute for Justice counts at least twenty-two officers who used the system to track people they were romantically interested in, and calls that almost certainly an undercount. And the cameras keep falling.

Become ungovernable.

MAGA boomers SHOCKED by 20y/o commie speaking fluent hog

Hog 201 for anyone interested in trying this:

Bodily autonomy (like abortion, anti draft, etc) -> “The government shouldn’t be able to force anything on my body I don’t want.”

Anti surveillance -> “I don’t trust big government/big tech (big brother if you’re feeling frisky) with the ability to spy on me and my family.”

Immigration -> “Next to all of us immigrated at some point, I don’t see why the elites get to decide who’s allowed to be where. What’s to stop them coming for me?”

Climate Change -> “Big oil shouldn’t get to determine whether or not I get to go places. I don’t want to be dependent on some big business to survive.”

State Violence -> “I don’t want the goddamn secret police breathing down my neck! I trust my community a whole hell of a lot more to help me than I do the state!”

The vast majority of conservatives think of themselves as underdogs being repressed by the government/the elite, and they value personal freedom (specifically their personal freedom, they don’t care about other people). The will almost always agree with leftist points if you can find a way to blame the problem on their vague enemies (useful, since rich people are the root of most problems), and tie it back to their ability to say fuck everyone else. NEVER appeal to science, theory, logic, or human goodness. Make it seem as if you are a paranoid lunatic who trusts no one. They love it.

Avatar
Reblogged
There are not just masculine or feminine genders but also trans and cis genders. To be trans-gender is to be conscious of multiple forms of gendered becomings and belongings. Belonging to gendered categories is just as important as the process of coming to and coming from them. Trans-gender solidarity is not just a claim about the right to belong to a category, but a claim about how we unbelong to categories, how we create free access to the technologies that define these categories, how we affirm the agency to re-define these categories, and how we can enable each other to become more of ourselves.

I wish all the “religion is inherently bad” people who go on to describe issues exclusive to Christianity would understand that their idea of Christianity being analogous to all religion is a very glaring sign that they are still steeped in the Christian hegemony they seem to reject so vehemently

Avatar
Reblogged

"Go outside" not in the sense of "be in nature to reset your brain a bit" but in the sense of "go and look at how the world actually operates when you aren't in a bubble of people with your shared thoughts and beliefs every so often to remind yourself of how privilege actually operates in the real world."

"Trans men aren't victims of real transphobic violence, they're just seen as mentally ill girls (and therefore safe)" is a belief that only exists if you have never seen how women with schizophrenia are treated. Look at how conservatives SNEER the words "mentally ill" when talking about LGBT people they want to murder. Them calling you "mentally ill" is not a sign they want to protect you and help you "recover" like you think it is due to spending time on sites that are generally more positive to mentally ill people. When conservatives call someone mentally ill, they want that person locked up and forcibly medicated for the rest of their natural lives at best, and killed at worst. Go outside. Watch.

potentially controversial but i don't think "male sexuality is inherently predatory (and so if you don't want to be predatory, you're probably a girl) is a winning feminist take. i actually think it's exactly the opposite and we should really be avoiding the implication that predatory misogynistic behavior is biological and not social in nature

Avatar
Reblogged

Something I realized last night while talking to a friend is that so much of my experience and transition history as well as present day choices revolve around the ever-slim space I’ve carved out over years where I can be butch and masculine without immediately being misgendered and seen as a man.

I’m not a man. I’m masculine, I’m butch.

Being seen as a man can be uncomfortable for me, less than it used to be but if I’m completely honest it’s still not something I enjoy. But being masculine is the only way I’ve ever felt remotely comfortable and JOYFUL about who I am and how I present.

And henceforth I exist in these margins where by transitioning via estrogen hormone replacement therapy I’ve carved out a tiny space between these dysphoria inducing cells.

If I could press a button and never be seen as a man again I’d be so much more masculine and butch and dyke shaped.

As is most days i’m glad to have boobs but that’s exclusively because they most consistently make people think i’m not a man. If that wasn’t required then I’d be much happier with a flat chest, I feel. I love the look and some days I feel genuinely dysphoric about all that bouncing tissue.

If not shaving didn’t make people think I’m a guy instantly I’d love to be a dyke that rocks a beard.

I’m butch, I’m butch, I’m butch, I’m butch.

I’ve always been this way and any femininization I’ve gained is solely to gain more wiggle room between the way I feel most comfortable and being misgendered.

My transition is towards masculinity. I am transmasculine.

Avatar
Reblogged

btw "you are allowed to hate your oppressor" is about Your Personal Feelings As An Individual. that you are allowed to have whatever feelings you have about your experience being oppressed, and the fact that rage and hatred can be a powerful motivator to break away from the status quo and engage in revolutionary action against oppression, does not mean that no one is allowed to criticize an approach to liberation that is centered on rage and hatred given the very well recorded downsides to such an approach.

like "well POC are allowed to hate white people so women are allowed to hate men!" yeah and also, Malcom X himself realized he was wrong to disregard allyship with white people because coalition building between working class people of different races was actually quite important to overthrowing racial capitalism. plenty of feminists activists (particularly women of color, bisexuals, trans people, sex workers) have criticized feminism for separatism and gender essentialism and reluctance to form necessary coalitions across gender to meaningfully resist racist capitalist patriarchy.

none of this means You The Individual are not allowed to feel the emotion of hate in response of oppression, or that that emotion needs to be suppressed or stigmatized or shouldn't help motivate your resistance. but it's just naive and shortsighted to stop your revolutionary thought there.

Anonymous asked:

i started taking a look at whipping girl a while ago (after getting told "read whipping girl" one too many times) and simply just could not handle the consistently exorsexist shit that was in there. i don't really have much in depth criticisms, my issues with stuff like "complaining about cissexual genderqueers", the "binary-phobia" bullshit, and the paragraphs of theorising that nonbinary people identify that way for political reasons, alongside the general issues with hypocrisy/inconsistency (like the bit where serano comments that it's important that we be aware that others have experiences we don't understand, before almost immediately going on to make sweeping assumptions about the experiences of trans men and nonbinary people)... it's all in a hard to articulate space of "aaargh can you not see why this is shitty???" for me

it's kind of galling that, even with serano acknowledging that it has flaws regarding other trans people's experiences, that it does not account for intersectional aspects of transfemininity like race and disability, etc... she went ahead and republished it, again, a couple years ago, just with some comments about how it's "a bit dated" to my understanding.

anyway, the point is: thank you for putting as much time and effort into your more detailed critiques on that book as you have.

LITERALLY !!!!! It's such a deeply hypocritical collection of writing.

I do truly think Serano wants to believe that she means what she says when she talks about things like not making assumptions about other trans people. I don't think she's some horrible terrible evil person who venomously hates other trans people, but I do think she hasn't actually unpacked her own biases as well as she thinks she has, and it leads to a lot of hypocrisy and contradictions in her work like the ones you're identifying.

Anonymous asked:

https://www.tumblr.com/ftmtftm/815966366270111744/sometimes-i-really-want-to-take-everyone-under-the

i really needed to hear this post. thank you. youre the first one whos apologized for how much covid took from me and it means alot. i know im a nobody but im going to carry it with me. thank you again.

💛 I'm glad it was meaningful for you anon, you're welcome!

Anonymous asked:

Re: why people are afraid of lesbian trans women & lesbian trans men both existing simultaneously, or of gay trans men and gay trans women existing simultaneously —

In addition to what you said about it disrupting white supremacist ideas of order and categorization, I think it’s also due to a scarcity mindset. In the lesbian community, I’ve seen both trans women/transfems and trans men/transmascs say stuff like “it’s so unfair that lesbians accept [other trans group] while [my trans group] is treated so poorly.”

Putting aside that they’re ignoring the ways that cis lesbian communities often mistreat trans people of all stripes — it’s acting as if acceptance is a zero-sum game, as if one group being treated well means that your group will automatically be treated worse. As if someone loving trans women/fems means that they can’t give just as much love to trans men/mascs, or vise-versa.

IMO this is also a white supremacist (& capitalist) mindset that I wish more queer people would question in themselves.

Yes absolutely !!!!!!!!

Avatar
Reblogged

Frankly I think a lot of Tumblr users think there is no overlap between trans women and gay men like there is between trans men and lesbians 1. because RuPaul did a great job intentionally convincing at least two generations of baby queers that gay men and trans women don't share culture because he's a transmisogynist piece of shit who intentionally kept trans women off Drag Race for years - shattering the perception of our community overlap in the eyes of the mainstream, 1.5. and that culture he cultivated in the mainstream made you afraid of drag as an art so you're uncurious about it, and 2. you're afraid of learning about balls because they're not sanitized white queer culture.

I need it to be so clear that I said "our community overlap" so intentionally because as nonbinary as I am, being a gay man is also a deeply important part of my identity.

Wonderfully faggotty trans women who fuck around with gender and sexuality and do drag* were hugely influential when it came to my own realization that I not only could but also explicitly *wanted* to blur the lines between man and woman too. I owe them so much. We share this wonderful space in gay and trans identity together that I'm eternally thankful for and despise RuPaul for erasing.

*And because this is the website we're on: It's okay if that's not the kind of trans woman you are and I'm genuinely sorry if people try to impose that kind of identity on you — but if this isn't how you identify I'm just flat out not talking about you. I'm talking about those women who DO like to fuck around and play with gender and drag. They're just as much women as you are and you need to get over yourself about it.