Carmen S.

sirius could call remus handsome and forget about it immediately and remus will remember it on his deathbed...

He is gonna write it on his journal then put bowie lyrics around it

every time i watch one of max’s documentaries all i can think is “fuck, that man’s so autistic”

But like in a good way 👍

I love the au where Sirius and Remus actually started dating around second year. Remus, during a petty argument with Sirius after a few weeks of dating, tried to break up with him in a fit of rage but Sirius just scoffed and went “No.” And they’ve been together ever since because Remus didn’t know what to do after that.

Dealer! Remus who never let Sirius touch drugs even when drunk! Sirius begs him to let him try cocaine

Sirius pouts and makes his puppy eyes and Remus grabs him by his collar and crashes his lips on his

Sirius then decides Remus is far better than cocaine

Sirius is like those creepypastas that appear if you say their name but with I'm Sirius jokes

Drunk Regulus becomes a lovey dovey looking at everyone with stars in his eyes, blinking fast like a baby, gets very sleepy.

Drunk Sirius thinks he is a god, or something close to that.

Drunk Remus becomes confident and cocky, making fun of everyone.

Drunk James has 2 stages after few frinks James thinks he is the strongest man ever and offers to arm wrestle with everyone after more than few he becomes numb and kinda stupid.

Drunk Peter even after 1 drink gets emotional and starts to thank people for being his friends.

She likes Regulus Black but Snape is so bad. Okaaaaay

Well Snape had a choice, Regulus didn't. Also only one betrayed their friend sooo

Regulus had a name, family money, and he would’ve inherited even more from his uncle, just like Sirius did. What did Snape have? An abusive father? A house in the worst neighborhood of a grim industrial town in the 1970s? A literal slum? Not even enough money to buy decent clothes?

Do you seriously not realize how classist it is to pretend an aristocrat and a working-class kid growing up in poverty had the same opportunities? That’s just denying material reality.

Funny how you bring up Nazis while arguing exactly like a reactionary.

Well if we think that way, Harry had the same fate as Snape did. We all see what he did with his life.

At eleven years old, Harry inherits a fortune. Snape doesn’t. That’s economic capital (go read some Marxist sociology).

At eleven, Harry has friends who would literally die for him. Snape doesn’t. That’s social capital.

At eleven, Harry has adults who genuinely care about him and look out for him. Snape doesn’t. Again, social capital.

At eleven, Harry has an institution that ultimately backs him. His teachers protect him, advocate for him, and repeatedly intervene on his behalf. Snape doesn’t. That’s institutional capital.

So no, Harry and Snape did not start from the same position or have the same opportunities. Ignoring differences in material conditions and pretending everyone has the same choices regardless of class and support systems is the opposite of a structural analysis.

I sincerely hope you don’t consider yourself left-wing, because this argument is pure meritocratic individualism, babe.

Oh my god you talk so much and say the exactly same things over and over. Its not that deep bro. You are comparing yourself or the modern world to wizards who lived in a racist society and had to fight in a war at 17. You know literally nothing about. If you don't enjoy them just shut up and go talk about your own interests. I feel like a person who "knows so much" and read "so many things" should know this already. Now get the f out of my page bro.

It’s always funny how you can tell someone has run out of arguments when they suddenly switch from discussing the actual point to getting defensive and telling people to “leave their page.”

You went from “Harry and Snape had the same opportunities” to “stop talking about it, it’s not that deep” because you couldn’t actually address the differences in economic, social, and institutional capital between them.

If your only response to an argument is “you talk too much” instead of engaging with what’s being said, that’s usually a pretty clear sign you don’t have a counterargument.

Or in my native language: que eres más tonta que una mierda, pava

No it's literally because you talk too much and i have so many better things to do than to discuss this with you, and its so obvious even if a wrote a whole page about this you still wouldn't be convinced, it is so clear from the way you talk. Just let people enjoy their own interests and try not to be such a loser. Not everybody cares or wants your opinion.

Or in my native language: Hadi yallah isine bak kardes

Your “interest” here seems to be defending class privilege, though, lol.

It’s funny how “let people enjoy their interests” suddenly becomes the argument when someone challenges the social implications of the characters and points out the material differences between them. Nobody is stopping you from enjoying anything, you’re just annoyed that someone is actually analysing the themes instead of accepting the surface-level reading.

Also, saying “you talk too much” is not a counterargument. It’s just a way to avoid engaging with the argument when you don’t have a response.

Oh okay, youll die alone btw just saying 🫶🫶

Drunk Regulus becomes a lovey dovey looking at everyone with stars in his eyes, blinking fast like a baby, gets very sleepy.

Drunk Sirius thinks he is a god, or something close to that.

Drunk Remus becomes confident and cocky, making fun of everyone.

Drunk James has 2 stages after few frinks James thinks he is the strongest man ever and offers to arm wrestle with everyone after more than few he becomes numb and kinda stupid.

Drunk Peter even after 1 drink gets emotional and starts to thank people for being his friends.

She likes Regulus Black but Snape is so bad. Okaaaaay

Well Snape had a choice, Regulus didn't. Also only one betrayed their friend sooo

Regulus had a name, family money, and he would’ve inherited even more from his uncle, just like Sirius did. What did Snape have? An abusive father? A house in the worst neighborhood of a grim industrial town in the 1970s? A literal slum? Not even enough money to buy decent clothes?

Do you seriously not realize how classist it is to pretend an aristocrat and a working-class kid growing up in poverty had the same opportunities? That’s just denying material reality.

Funny how you bring up Nazis while arguing exactly like a reactionary.

Well if we think that way, Harry had the same fate as Snape did. We all see what he did with his life.

At eleven years old, Harry inherits a fortune. Snape doesn’t. That’s economic capital (go read some Marxist sociology).

At eleven, Harry has friends who would literally die for him. Snape doesn’t. That’s social capital.

At eleven, Harry has adults who genuinely care about him and look out for him. Snape doesn’t. Again, social capital.

At eleven, Harry has an institution that ultimately backs him. His teachers protect him, advocate for him, and repeatedly intervene on his behalf. Snape doesn’t. That’s institutional capital.

So no, Harry and Snape did not start from the same position or have the same opportunities. Ignoring differences in material conditions and pretending everyone has the same choices regardless of class and support systems is the opposite of a structural analysis.

I sincerely hope you don’t consider yourself left-wing, because this argument is pure meritocratic individualism, babe.

Oh my god you talk so much and say the exactly same things over and over. Its not that deep bro. You are comparing yourself or the modern world to wizards who lived in a racist society and had to fight in a war at 17. You know literally nothing about. If you don't enjoy them just shut up and go talk about your own interests. I feel like a person who "knows so much" and read "so many things" should know this already. Now get the f out of my page bro.

It’s always funny how you can tell someone has run out of arguments when they suddenly switch from discussing the actual point to getting defensive and telling people to “leave their page.”

You went from “Harry and Snape had the same opportunities” to “stop talking about it, it’s not that deep” because you couldn’t actually address the differences in economic, social, and institutional capital between them.

If your only response to an argument is “you talk too much” instead of engaging with what’s being said, that’s usually a pretty clear sign you don’t have a counterargument.

Or in my native language: que eres más tonta que una mierda, pava

And im gonna block you probably so have a good life 👍👍

Drunk Regulus becomes a lovey dovey looking at everyone with stars in his eyes, blinking fast like a baby, gets very sleepy.

Drunk Sirius thinks he is a god, or something close to that.

Drunk Remus becomes confident and cocky, making fun of everyone.

Drunk James has 2 stages after few frinks James thinks he is the strongest man ever and offers to arm wrestle with everyone after more than few he becomes numb and kinda stupid.

Drunk Peter even after 1 drink gets emotional and starts to thank people for being his friends.

She likes Regulus Black but Snape is so bad. Okaaaaay

Well Snape had a choice, Regulus didn't. Also only one betrayed their friend sooo

Regulus had a name, family money, and he would’ve inherited even more from his uncle, just like Sirius did. What did Snape have? An abusive father? A house in the worst neighborhood of a grim industrial town in the 1970s? A literal slum? Not even enough money to buy decent clothes?

Do you seriously not realize how classist it is to pretend an aristocrat and a working-class kid growing up in poverty had the same opportunities? That’s just denying material reality.

Funny how you bring up Nazis while arguing exactly like a reactionary.

Well if we think that way, Harry had the same fate as Snape did. We all see what he did with his life.

At eleven years old, Harry inherits a fortune. Snape doesn’t. That’s economic capital (go read some Marxist sociology).

At eleven, Harry has friends who would literally die for him. Snape doesn’t. That’s social capital.

At eleven, Harry has adults who genuinely care about him and look out for him. Snape doesn’t. Again, social capital.

At eleven, Harry has an institution that ultimately backs him. His teachers protect him, advocate for him, and repeatedly intervene on his behalf. Snape doesn’t. That’s institutional capital.

So no, Harry and Snape did not start from the same position or have the same opportunities. Ignoring differences in material conditions and pretending everyone has the same choices regardless of class and support systems is the opposite of a structural analysis.

I sincerely hope you don’t consider yourself left-wing, because this argument is pure meritocratic individualism, babe.

Oh my god you talk so much and say the exactly same things over and over. Its not that deep bro. You are comparing yourself or the modern world to wizards who lived in a racist society and had to fight in a war at 17. You know literally nothing about. If you don't enjoy them just shut up and go talk about your own interests. I feel like a person who "knows so much" and read "so many things" should know this already. Now get the f out of my page bro.

It’s always funny how you can tell someone has run out of arguments when they suddenly switch from discussing the actual point to getting defensive and telling people to “leave their page.”

You went from “Harry and Snape had the same opportunities” to “stop talking about it, it’s not that deep” because you couldn’t actually address the differences in economic, social, and institutional capital between them.

If your only response to an argument is “you talk too much” instead of engaging with what’s being said, that’s usually a pretty clear sign you don’t have a counterargument.

Or in my native language: que eres más tonta que una mierda, pava

No it's literally because you talk too much and i have so many better things to do than to discuss this with you, and its so obvious even if a wrote a whole page about this you still wouldn't be convinced, it is so clear from the way you talk. Just let people enjoy their own interests and try not to be such a loser. Not everybody cares or wants your opinion.

Or in my native language: Hadi yallah isine bak kardes