Avatar

its piggy dog hour

@aceynk

Aloe | she/her & it/its | i'm >18 | tma | white

Pinned

i’m Aloe. im a girl. tma & i love trans girls with all my heart.

the heart of my politics is marxism-leninism and transfeminism.

---

i check the blogs of people who follow me, i might softblock for a variety of reasons. you can always ask to follow, though!

---

i also run @notaloen as an art / aes blog!

======

For Palestinian fundraisers — I tend not to reply to messages, but I will queue donation request posts if you do message me a request. thank you, and i wish you the best in everything. From the river to the sea.

======

Avatar
Reblogged bunniope

Why are there just blobs of fake rubber meat that a bunch of unrelated microbes can build in the dirt but they've only ever been found in china and can't be classified any further than "biological objects"

“These ugly looking creatures”

Avatar
Reblogged

how did it honestly even survive

Avatar
Reblogged

If you've ever gained something from my writing, or you enjoy my games, I've set up a ko-fi!

it helps me pay for:

- bottom surgery

- laser hair removal

- college

it also gives me more time to devote to:

- my writing

- development of my game, Enter the Wyrm, which is playable now for free in open alpha!

thank you 🫶

Currently trying to afford the required hair removal to get my bottom surgery! I'm 2% of the way there!

update: 5%!!!

we are at 9%!!!!!!

Avatar
Reblogged

i've been marinating the idea of generalizing dirichlet convolutions in several ways and what has been interesting was finding which methods of generalization just boil down to being dirichlet convolutions again under the hood and which don't.

for example, try generalizing by selecting only divisors of a certain form. let h be some function h : N_{>0} -> N_{>0}.

now write the convolution as:

(f * g)(n) = Σ_{ h(d) | n } f(h(d))•g(n / h(d))

if we define an indicator function t(x) to return 1 when x is in the image of h, and 0 otherwise, we can rewrite this as:

(f * g)(n) = Σ_{ d | n ; t(d) = 1 } f(d)•g(n/d) -> (f * g)(n) = Σ_{ d | n } t(d)•f(d)•g(n/d) -> (tf * g)(n)

which is just dirichlet convolution again. (this is pretty obvious if u think about it for a minute, but i was exhausted when first working on this & proved it via dirichlet series rather than the simple route lmao)

as far as i've seen so far, the way to generalize to expand upon dirichlet convolutions comes down to information. u need to make it so that the inner functions f,g don't "know" as much about n when passed arguments in the sum. it's a little hard to explain this but it makes sense to me intuitively.

one example of a generalization that's more interesting to me recently is iterating over numbers coprime to n rather than divisors. where a divisor set might look like {1, 3, 5, 15} and pair up as (1,15), (3,5), the set of integers coprime to 15 in this case would be {1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14} and pair up as (1,14), (2,13), (4,11), (7,8).

so in this case the dirichlet convolution would sum up f(1)g(15) + f(3)g(5) + f(5)g(3) + f(15)g(1), but the generalization would sum up:

f(1)g(14) + f(2)g(13) + f(4)g(11) + f(7)g(8) + f(8)g(7) + f(11)g(4) + f(13)g(2) + f(14)g(1)

which has a different relationship to knowledge of n than dirichlet convolutions do. which is interesting to explore. where dirichlet convolutions pair up (x,y) such that xy = n, this approach pairs up numbers such that x+y = n, which might be interesting for looking for connections between addition & multiplication. additionally, i don't think that this convolution over coprime numbers is able to be represented as a dirichlet convolution, and might deal with a unique space of arithmetic functions.

it's very possible this is like a Known structure & nothing new but whatever i'm having fun exploring.

i've been marinating the idea of generalizing dirichlet convolutions in several ways and what has been interesting was finding which methods of generalization just boil down to being dirichlet convolutions again under the hood and which don't.

for example, try generalizing by selecting only divisors of a certain form. let h be some function h : N_{>0} -> N_{>0}.

now write the convolution as:

(f * g)(n) = Σ_{ h(d) | n } f(h(d))•g(n / h(d))

if we define an indicator function t(x) to return 1 when x is in the image of h, and 0 otherwise, we can rewrite this as:

(f * g)(n) = Σ_{ d | n ; t(d) = 1 } f(d)•g(n/d) -> (f * g)(n) = Σ_{ d | n } t(d)•f(d)•g(n/d) -> (tf * g)(n)

which is just dirichlet convolution again. (this is pretty obvious if u think about it for a minute, but i was exhausted when first working on this & proved it via dirichlet series rather than the simple route lmao)

as far as i've seen so far, the way to generalize to expand upon dirichlet convolutions comes down to information. u need to make it so that the inner functions f,g don't "know" as much about n when passed arguments in the sum. it's a little hard to explain this but it makes sense to me intuitively.

one example of a generalization that's more interesting to me recently is iterating over numbers coprime to n rather than divisors. where a divisor set might look like {1, 3, 5, 15} and pair up as (1,15), (3,5), the set of integers coprime to 15 in this case would be {1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14} and pair up as (1,14), (2,13), (4,11), (7,8).

so in this case the dirichlet convolution would sum up f(1)g(15) + f(3)g(5) + f(5)g(3) + f(15)g(1), but the generalization would sum up:

f(1)g(14) + f(2)g(13) + f(4)g(11) + f(7)g(8) + f(8)g(7) + f(11)g(4) + f(13)g(2) + f(14)g(1)

which has a different relationship to knowledge of n than dirichlet convolutions do. which is interesting to explore. where dirichlet convolutions pair up (x,y) such that xy = n, this approach pairs up numbers such that x+y = n, which might be interesting for looking for connections between addition & multiplication. additionally, i don't think that this convolution over coprime numbers is able to be represented as a dirichlet convolution, and might deal with a unique space of arithmetic functions.

Avatar
Reblogged

reference / inspiration pictures for a level i wanna make

Avatar
Reblogged

i'm sorry but im 99% sure the new pjackk is fake. you can go to any old pjackk post and see that that blog is still de-activated. the blog might be run by the original person (cant confirm cause i dont have a way to contact them) but i can confidently say i dont think they would give famed "scary hunk with some hairy junk" lover pjackk an icon with the lesbian pride flag

Avatar
Reblogged

i'm sorry but im 99% sure the new pjackk is fake. you can go to any old pjackk post and see that that blog is still de-activated. the blog might be run by the original person (cant confirm cause i dont have a way to contact them) but i can confidently say i dont think they would give famed "scary hunk with some hairy junk" lover pjackk an icon with the lesbian pride flag