Every year, I swear I'm going to keep better tabs on the books I read through the year, and I don't. We're only six days into 2012, and I've finished
V for Vengeance and halfway through
N is for Noose in the Kinsey Millhone series.
Unfortunately, I don't have enough time do in-depth reviews of either, but I will say this. Halfway through the series (starting with
Q is for Quarry, if I'm recalling correctly) Grafton completely changed the way she wrote the books. Instead of always being from Millhone's first-person perspective, she started including narration from other characters. I can see the literary value behind it, as it does help build tension and create a red herring effect of sorts, but it just strikes me as odd that she'd do it after she has over a dozen books with a rigid formula under her belt.
So it irritates me, and I'm realizing that although it's helped flesh the characters out and generate a greater sense of urgency to the mystery, I actually prefer the old Millhone books. This is in stark contrast to the Stephanie Plum series, where the books get more and more hilariously absurd because Evanovich has proven her merit and she can do ridiculous things like have Lula fight a giant chicken with no recourse to her over all sales.
Which reminds me, to digress a bit. Along those same lines, I'm excited about the
One for the Money Evanovich adaptation coming out this month. I must have been living under a rock during the filming process, because the first I heard of it was watching a preview during an episode of "Teen Mom" last week. I've been an avid follower of the books for about a decade, ever since I borrowed
To the Nines from Caroline while traveling to Geneseo the month after we graduated high school. I'm not sure how you make an adaptation of a book series rounding out number 18, but I'm excited to see it, and if it's any testament, I occasionally read snippets aloud to B and
he actually wants to see it, too.
So far, the reaction to the cast has been pretty mixed. I understand why people want Sandra Bullock, and I wouldn't consider myself a rabid Katherine Heigl fan, but I admit I think she's a smarter cast for Stephaie Plum (though I'm worried about how hard she'll fall trying to pull off the Jersey accent) because she looks like how I've always pictured the character, and Bullock seems to be focusing on a more "respectable" drama genre, if she's still interested in acting at all. On the plus side, Evanovich has considered Heigl as "
the real Stephanie Plum" since 2007, so that's a pretty powerful endorsement.
As far as the rest of the cast, I'm not familiar with either of the actors playing Ranger or Morelli, but I think Ranger looks spot-on, and the greasy, rat-faced man slated to play Vincent Plum is perfect, too. I'm disappointed in the casting of Grandma Mazur only because I picture the character as a modern Sophia Petrillo, and feel that her proximity to the late Estelle Getty and rabid fan club makes Betty White the best choice, rather than Debbie Reynolds. But, I also admit Betty White is big and buxom, whereas the more petite Reynolds is probably more consistent with how Evanovich imagined her.
As far as Sherri Shepherd as Lula, I shouldn't have read up on her. Her ignorance on "The View" pisses me off, but maybe she can use that to her advantage playing the former 'ho who provides pretty politically incorrect comic relief.
So, back to the book. I have to say I liked the storyline of
V better than some of the yarns Grafton has been spinning this late in the series. It featured an organized crime read, a grieving mother, a stupefied widower, and a gangster with a heart of gold, and although I'm not sure why, she's seemed to put a lot of effort into humanizing folks that probably ought to be seen as villains. Still, it was a quick page-turner and easy read for any Grafton fan.
Kinsey didn't experience any notable personal growth, which surprised me, given how
U is for Undertow ended by allowing her a reunion with some folks from her past. Beyond a few passages referencing the end of her first marriage and her status as an orphan, there was no continuation of the family saga played out from the other book, or mention of how it might have concluded. That's one issue I have with reading any of Grafton's novels--a relationship might end between two books, and the reader is left without ever knowing why, and the character will emerge a few years later with no apparent chemistry to Kinsey. Personally, loopholes in a series irritate me, especially in a mystery series, where all questions are supposed to be answered.