The Unorthodox Margaret Cavendish

In Karen Detlefsen & Lisa Shapiro, The Routledge Handbook of Women and Early Modern European Philosophy. Routledge (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that, while Cavendish did express orthodox piety, she is likely to have been read by her contemporaries as heterodox and deistic at best, atheistic at worst. Furthermore, they would have been right: it is seemingly impossible to reconcile her metaphysical and epistemological views with particular providence, miracles, the incarnation and revelation. We proceed by outlining her general metaphysical position (section 1) before looking in some detail at her discussion of immaterial beings (section 2). We then consider the implications of these views for certain orthodox Christian doctrines (section 3).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-01

Downloads
723 (#80,501)

6 months
246 (#38,124)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tom Stoneham
University of York
Peter West
Northeastern University London

Citations of this work

The Depth of Margaret Cavendish's Ecology.Peter West & Manuel Fasko - 2025 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 12 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1651 - Baltimore,: Clarendon Press. Edited by C. B. Macpherson.
Margaret Cavendish on Motion and Mereology.Alison Peterman - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (3):471-499.
Observations upon Experimental Philosophy.Margaret Cavendish & Eileen O'neill - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):175-177.

View all 16 references / Add more references