- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Criteria for scientific choice
Minerva 1 (2):159-171 (1963)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Revisiting ‘Weinberg’s Choice’: Classic Tensions in the Concept of Scientific Merit. [REVIEW]Tomas Hellström & Merle Jacob - 2012 - Minerva 50 (3):381-396.
McAllister's aesthetics in science: A critical notice.David Davies - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):25 – 32.
The simplicity of theories: Its degree and form. [REVIEW]James W. McAllister - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):1-14.
Criteria and evaluation of cognitive theories.Petros A. M. Gelepithis - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):607-609.
Scientific value.Lars Bergström - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):189-202.
Scientific choice, basic science and applied missions.Alvin M. Weinberg - 1965 - Minerva 3 (4):515-523.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
104 (#483,715)
6 months
16 (#712,980)
2013-12-01
Downloads
104 (#483,715)
6 months
16 (#712,980)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Well-Ordered Science’s Basic Problem.Cristian Larroulet Philippi - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (2):365-375.
Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories.Elena Castellani - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (2):251-267.
Modes of Relevance in Research: Towards Understanding the Promises and Possibilities of Doing Relevance.Lucas Brunet, Maximilian Fochler, Ruth Müller & Lisa Sigl - 2025 - Minerva 63 (2):183-203.
Claiming Relevance for Social Science and the Humanities: Relevance Expressions Across Methodological Divides.Tomas Hellström & Merle Jacob - forthcoming - Minerva:1-23.
Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation.Barry Bozeman & Daniel Sarewitz - 2011 - Minerva 49 (1):1-23.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation