Level-Crossing Principles

In Normative Externalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 119-129 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter introduces normative externalism about epistemology. It takes what is central to normative externalism to be the denial of level-crossing principles. A level-crossing principle says there is a necessary connection between the propriety of a belief (in some sense of propriety), and the propriety of believing that very belief to be proper. The main theme of this part is outlined: level-crossing principles are inconsistent with evidentialism, and it is level-crossing principles, not evidentialism, that should be abandoned. The chapter also discusses the relationship between state-level evaluations, like the rationality of a belief, and agent-level evaluations, like the wisdom of a believer. And it briefly discusses the role of evidence in mathematics, and how the kind of evidentialism I favor extends to mathematical belief.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Higher-Order Evidence.Brian Weatherson - 2019 - In Normative Externalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 130-145.
Circles, Epistemic and Benign.Brian Weatherson - 2019 - In Normative Externalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 146-169.
Conflicts of Normativity.Andrew Reisner - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Oxford
A Short Refutation of Strict Normative Evidentialism.Andrew E. Reisner - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (5):1-9.
Akrasia.Brian Weatherson - 2019 - In Normative Externalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 170-185.
Reasons and Theoretical Rationality.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - In Daniel Star, The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Evidence.Michael Tooley - 2019 - In Graham Oppy, A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 303–322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
3 (#2,296,125)

6 months
3 (#1,866,497)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Weatherson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

References found in this work

Higher Order Evidence.David Christensen - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):185-215.
Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Studia Logica 48 (2):260-261.
Does Murphy's Law Apply in Epistemology?: Self-Doubt and Rational Ideals.David Christensen - 2007 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne, Oxford Studies in Epistemology: Volume 2. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Games, Beliefs and Credences.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (2):209-236.

View all 6 references / Add more references