- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The nonidentity problem, disability, and the role morality of prospective parents
Ethics 116 (1):132-152 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Melinda A. Roberts, David T. Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. [REVIEW]Jörg Chet Tremmel - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (4).
What Are Parents For?: Reproductive Ethics after the Nonidentity Problem.Bernard G. Prusak - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (2):37-47.
Review of Anita Silvers, David Wasserman, and Mary Mahowald, disability, difference, discrimination: Perspectives on justice in bioethics and public policy. [REVIEW]Alan H. Goldman - 2000 - Ethics 110 (4).
Review of Anita Silvers, David Wasserman, and Mary Mahowald, Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy:Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. [REVIEW]Alan H. Goldman - 2000 - Ethics 110 (4):873-875.
Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts, Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 49--68.
Anita Silvers, David Wasserman and Mary B. Mahowald, Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy Reviewed by.Ritz Chow - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19 (6):445-447.
Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce?David Benatar & David Wasserman (eds.) - 2015 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
The intractability of the nonidentity problem.David Heyd - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts, Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 3--25.
Book review: Anita Silvers, David Wasserman, and Mary B. Mahowald. Disability, difference, and discrimination: Perspectives on justice in bioethics and public policy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998. [REVIEW]Eva Feder Kittay - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (1):209-213.
Two Varieties of “Better-For” Judgements.Peter Herissone-Kelly - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts, Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 249--263.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
295 (#146,849)
6 months
19 (#572,430)
2009-01-28
Downloads
295 (#146,849)
6 months
19 (#572,430)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
AI Alignment vs. AI Ethical Treatment: Ten Challenges.Adam Bradley & Bradford Saad - forthcoming - Analytic Philosophy.
Is there a tension between AI safety and AI welfare?Robert Long, Jeff Sebo & Toni Sims - 2025 - Philosophical Studies 182 (7):2005-2033.
Harming as causing harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts, Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 137--154.
The Semi-Future Democracy. A Liberal Theory of the Long-term View.Andre Santos Campos - 2024 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation