On Some Mistaken Beliefs About Core Logic and Some Mistaken Core Beliefs About Logic

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (4):559-578 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is in part a reply to a recent work of Vidal-Rosset, which expresses various mistaken beliefs about Core Logic. Rebutting these leads us further to identify, and argue against, some mistaken core beliefs about logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-10

Downloads
101 (#505,715)

6 months
5 (#1,607,410)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Tennant
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

The Logic for Mathematics without Ex Falso Quodlibet.Neil Tennant - 2024 - Philosophia Mathematica 32 (2):177-215.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Frege.P. T. Geach & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):140-141.
Aristotle’s Syllogistic and Core Logic.Neil Tennant - 2014 - History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (2):120-147.
The independence of connectives.Timothy Smiley - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (4):426-436.
Cut for core logic.Neil Tennant - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):450-479.
Cut for classical core logic.Neil Tennant - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):236-256.

View all 13 references / Add more references