Anima and Animus in Jung’s Time and Ours

In James J. Dillon, Complex and Archetype: Exploring the Forces which Animate Our Lives. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 163-190 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter presents the historical context of Jung’s controversial notions of anima and animus. It shows that the typological associations that have come to define these terms were a vestige of Jung’s work on the association tests which were amplified in his 1921 book Psychological Types. It proposes that rather than the psychological functions of thinking and feeling, it is intuition which may be most attuned to Jung’s early presentations of these ideas. It summarizes three early works on anima, animus, and gender in analytical psychology before highlighting the reformulation of anima offered by James Hillman, some version of which seemingly prevails among those seeking to revise this aspect of Jung’s thought. The chapter demonstrates, however, that by returning to Jung’s earliest articulations of these notions, anima and animus emerge anew as fundamentally non-gendered functions of relation between consciousness and the unconscious which, as such, retain their interpretive utility in the midst of modern social conditions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychological Types.C. G. Jung & H. Godwin Baynes - 1923 - Journal of Philosophy 20 (23):636-640.
Psychological Types.C. G. Jung - 1971 - Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-11-18

Downloads
22 (#1,786,890)

6 months
17 (#661,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references