Bad apples: Feminist politics and feminist scholarship

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):354-388 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some exceptional and surprising mistakes of scholarship made in the writings of a number of feminist academics (Ruth Bleier, Ruth Hubbard, Susan Bordo, Sandra Harding, and Rae Langton) are examined in detail. This essay offers the psychological hypothesis that these mistakes were the result of political passion and concludes with some remarks about the ability of the social sciences to study the effect of the politics of the researcher on the quality of his or her research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes.Susan Bordo (ed.) - 1999 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Feminist Pornography as Feminist Propaganda, and Ideological Catch-22s.Aidan McGlynn - 2021 - In Jennifer Lackey, Applied Epistemology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 283-302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,169 (#13,193)

6 months
329 (#20,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Gender, Objectivity, and Realism.Alan Soble - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):509-530.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
Naturalness.Cian Dorr & John Hawthorne - 2013 - In Karen Bennett & Dean W. Zimmerman, Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 8. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 1.

View all 89 references / Add more references