Indiscriminability and the phenomenal

Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):91-112 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I describe and criticize M.G.F. Martin's version of disjunctivism, and his argument for it from premises about self-knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disjunctivism, Discrimination, and Categorization.Diana Raffman - 2014 - In Berit Brogaard, Does Perception Have Content? New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 179-196.
Transparency and Imagining Seeing.Fabian Dorsch - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (3):173-200.
What the Internal Could Be.Madhucchanda Sen - 2015 - In Externalism and the Mental. Delhi, IN: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 53-108.
Indiscriminability.Katalin Farkas - 2008 - In The Subject’s Point of View. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 100-126.
What Is Negative Disjunctivism?David de Bruijn - 2022 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 12 (2):150-170.
Naïve realism and extreme disjunctivism.M. D. Conduct - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (3):201-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
523 (#103,981)

6 months
39 (#219,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susanna Siegel
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Why Naive Realism?Heather Logue - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (2pt2):211-237.
Hallucination and Its Objects.Alex Byrne & Riccardo Manzotti - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (3):327-359.
Why explain visual experience in terms of content?Adam Pautz - 2010 - In Bence Nanay, Perceiving the world. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 254--309.
Disjunctivism and perceptual psychology.Tyler Burge - 2005 - Philosophical Topics 33 (1):1-78.

View all 69 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references