Death

In Graham Oppy, A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 262–274 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend two major theses: (i) because the dead no longer exist, the dead cannot be harmed or wronged; and (ii) because the dead cannot be harmed or wronged, it is irrational to care about the future postmortem state of our reputations. I explain away common intuitions that the dead can be harmed by pointing to our ability to imagine ourselves in the place of a dead person. When we imagine ourselves in the place of a dead person, we exploit a third person perspective that is simply not available to a dead person.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Welfare and Harm After Death.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 2013 - In James Stacey Taylor, The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death: New Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 188-209.
Harming the Dead.James Stacey Taylor - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:185-202.
Posthumous Harm.Steven Luper - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):63 - 72.
Harm, Change, and Time.C. Belshaw - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (5):425-444.
Dead Wrong: The Ethics of Posthumous Harm.David Boonin - 2019 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
54 (#1,106,882)

6 months
21 (#496,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Beth Seacord
College of Southern Nevada

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references