Judas Work

Environmental Philosophy 5 (2):51-66 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I examine four modes of thinking about the betrayals involved in the planned mass deaths of animals, specifically the wild donkeys of North Australia. I consider the wild, but in contrast to the positive valence this concept has acquired in environmental literature, I work with a set of negative connotations that I encountered in conversations with Aboriginal people in North Australia. I explore the wild as a form of narcissism, to use Hatley’s terminology, and I engage with animal mass deaths as an outcome of processes of disconnection and catastrophe. My analysis examines how the colonising wild is the tearing apart of the fabric of life and death on earth.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zoos: A Philosophical Tour.Keekok Lee - 2005 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The wild animal as a research animal.Jac A. A. Swart - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):181-197.
The Medical Treatment of Wild Animals.Robert W. Loftin - 1985 - Environmental Ethics 7 (3):231-239.
The concept of intrinsic value and transgenic animals.H. Verhoog - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):147-160.
“Taming the Wild Profusion of Existing Things”?Clare Palmer - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (4):339-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
103 (#490,971)

6 months
10 (#1,124,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Life’s potentiality as multispecies gift.João Aldeia - 2024 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 24:15-30.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The foundations of bioethics.Hugo Tristram Engelhardt - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references