- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is 'science as social' a feminist insight?
Social Epistemology 16 (3):233 – 249 (2002)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
On Black-boxing gender: Some social questions for Bruno Latour.Susan Sturman - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):181 – 184.
The open end: Social naturalism, feminist values and the integrity of epistemology.Catherine Hundleby - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (3):251 – 265.
Veritistic epistemology and feminist epistemology: A-rational epistemics?Cassandra L. Pinnick - 2000 - Social Epistemology 14 (4):281 – 291.
Which Groups Have Scientific Knowledge? Wray Vs. Rolin.Chris Dragos - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (5):611-623.
Veritistic Social Epistemology and Information Science.Don Fallis - 2000 - Social Epistemology 14 (4):305 – 316.
Introduction: Social epistemology and information science.Don Fallis - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (1):1 – 4.
Japan's reception of science in the light of social epistemology.Tadashi Kobayashi - 1999 - Social Epistemology 13 (3 & 4):251 – 256.
The ideal of objectivity in political dialogue: Liberal and feminist approaches.Kevin M. Graham - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (3):295 – 309.
Trust and information: The role of trust in the social epistemology of information science.Ashley Mcdowell - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (1):51 – 63.
Social epistemology as risk management of technoscience: The rationale and a model of democratization of science.Hideyuki Hirakawa - 1999 - Social Epistemology 13 (3 & 4):257 – 261.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
209 (#192,947)
6 months
14 (#866,120)
2009-01-28
Downloads
209 (#192,947)
6 months
14 (#866,120)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science.Justin Biddle - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):124-133.
What Knowers Know Well: Women, Work, and the Academy.Alison Wylie - 2011 - In Heidi Grasswick, Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge. Springer. pp. 157-179.
On Black-boxing gender: Some social questions for Bruno Latour.Susan Sturman - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):181 – 184.
Los valores como recursos epistémicos en las críticas feministas de la ciencia.Marta I. González García - 2022 - SCIO Revista de Filosofía 22:235-263.
Sharon Clough : Siblings under the Skin: Feminism, Social Justice and Analytic Philosophy.Kristina Rolin - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (2):224-227.
References found in this work
The advancement of science: science without legend, objectivity without illusions.Philip Kitcher - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Laboratory Life: The construction of scientific facts.Bruno Latour & Steve Woolgar - 1986 - Princeton University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation