Rebooting the bootstrap argument: Two puzzles for bootstrap theories of concept development

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):145 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Origin of Concepts sets out an impressive defense of the view that children construct entirely new systems of concepts. We offer here two questions about this theory. First, why doesn't the bootstrapping process provide a pattern for translating between the old and new systems, contradicting their claimed incommensurability? Second, can the bootstrapping process properly distinguish meaning change from belief change?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
111 (#437,428)

6 months
19 (#605,215)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Can Bootstrapping Explain Concept Learning?Jacob Beck - 2017 - Cognition 158 (C):110–121.
Reifying Representations.Michael Rescorla - 2020 - In Joulia Smortchkova, Krzysztof Dołęga & Tobias Schlicht, What Are Mental Representations? New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 135-177.
Counterfactuals as Strict Conditionals.Andrea Iacona - 2015 - Disputatio 7 (41):165-191.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Radical concept nativism.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2002 - Cognition 86 (1):25-55.
Concepts: a potboiler.Jerry Fodor - 1994 - Cognition 50 (1-3):95-113.
From numerical concepts to concepts of number.Lance J. Rips, Amber Bloomfield & Jennifer Asmuth - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):623-642.

View all 7 references / Add more references