Divine Necessity and the Cosmological Argument

The Monist 54 (3):401-415 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An analysis of the use of "necessary" in the cosmological argument reveals that the criticism of it, i.e., that its conclusion is self-contradictory because no existential proposition can be logically necessary, is due to the mistaken contention that the necessity involved is logical rather than conditional necessity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A new cosmological argument undone.Michael J. Almeida & Neal D. Judisch - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55-64.
Closed systems, explanations, and the cosmological argument.Kevin Davey & Mark Lippelmann - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):89-101.
Cosmological Argument: A Pragmatic Defense.Evan Sandsmark & Jason L. Megill - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):127 - 142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
203 (#198,848)

6 months
53 (#161,292)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce Reichenbach
Augsburg College

Citations of this work

Clarke, independence and necessity.Robin Attfield - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1 (2):67 – 82.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references