World without design: the ontological consequences of naturalism

New York: Oxford University Press (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical naturalism, according to which philosophy is continuous with the natural sciences, has dominated the Western academy for well over a century, but Michael Rea claims that it is without rational foundation. Rea argues compellingly to the surprising conclusion that naturalists are committed to rejecting realism about material objects, materialism, and perhaps realism about other minds.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
263 (#159,111)

6 months
24 (#434,395)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Rea
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

The Epistemic Axiology of Theism.Elizabeth Jackson - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Debunking Arguments in Metaethics and Metaphysics.Daniel Z. Korman - 2019 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Brian P. McLaughlin, Metaphysics and Cognitive Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 337-363.
Epistemic humility, arguments from evil, and moral skepticism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 2:17-57.
Power-ing up neo-aristotelian natural goodness.Ben Page - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3755-3775.

View all 66 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Y.Bernd Moeller & Bruno Jahn - 2005 - In Bernd Moeller & Bruno Jahn, Deutsche Biographische Enzyklopädie der Theologie und der Kirchen (DBETh). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Saur. pp. 1437-1438.
Rational Intuition.Linda Osbeck & Barbara Held (eds.) - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references