Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect

Yale University Press (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1989, the Cold War abruptly ended and it seemed as if the world was at last safe for democracy. But a spirit of uneasiness, discontent, and world-weariness soon arose and has persisted in Europe, in America, and elsewhere for two decades. To discern the meaning of this malaise we must investigate the nature of liberal democracy, says the author of this provocative book, and he undertakes to do so through a detailed investigation of the thinking of Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Tocqueville. Paul A. Rahe argues that these political thinkers anticipated the modern liberal republic's propensity to drift in the direction of “soft despotism”—a condition that arises within a democracy when paternalistic state power expands and gradually undermines the spirit of self-government. Such an eventuality, feared by Tocqueville in the nineteenth century, has now become a reality throughout the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. So Rahe asserts, and he explains what must be done to reverse this unfortunate trend.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-22

Downloads
33 (#1,530,636)

6 months
8 (#1,306,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Anthony Rahe
Hillsdale College

Citations of this work

Ethics and politics of virtue: from Classical Antiquity to Modern Society.Andrés de Francisco Díaz - 2025 - Ingenium. Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología En Historia de Las Ideas 19:13-20.
Montesquieu's natural rights constitutionalism.Paul A. Rahe - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):51-81.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references