CRISPR-Cas immunity: beyond nonself and defence

Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):6 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary of Koonin’s target paper, we defend an extended view of CRISPR-Cas immunity by arguing that CRISPR-Cas includes, but cannot be reduced to, defence against nonself. CRISPR-Cas systems can target endogenous elements and tolerate exogenous elements. We conclude that the vocabulary of “defence” and “nonself” might be misleading when describing CRISPR-Cas systems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-04

Downloads
98 (#529,305)

6 months
13 (#895,072)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Pradeu
CNRS & University Of Bordeaux

Citations of this work

Not by structures alone: Can the immune system recognize microbial functions?Gregor P. Greslehner - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 84 (C):101336.

Add more citations