Fraud in science

Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (4):1135-1150 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Even as today’s spectacular advances in science enhance the quality of life, so also are new opportunities created for those who would deliberately mislead a scientifically ill-informed public. The scientific community, made up of those who participate in professional science organizations and publish their methods and findings in the open scientific literature, have a responsibility to keep the public informed of scams carried out in the name of science. Fraud within the scientific community should be quickly exposed by the culture of openness. Secrecy in the name of national security offers a refuge for fraudulent science

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining and Understanding fraud.G. J. Rossouw - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):885-895.
Fraud in science an economic approach.James R. Wible - 1992 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (1):5-27.
Bibliography on scientific fraud.A. C. Higgins - 1994 - Albany, N.Y.: Exams Unlimited.
In support of fraud trials without a jury.Sally Serena Ramage - 2005 - The Criminal Lawyer 156 (156):1-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-29

Downloads
49 (#1,198,397)

6 months
1 (#2,175,231)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

With all this Pseudoscience, Why so Little Pseudotechnology?Sven Ove Hansson - 2022 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 2:226-241.
Tant de pseudosciences, si peu de pseudotechnologies.Sven Ove Hansson - 2022 - Mεtascience: Discours Général Scientifique 2:267-283. Translated by François Maurice.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references