A much misread proposition from Proclus' elements of theology

Classical Quarterly 65 (1):433-438 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proposition 28 from Proclus'Elements of Theologyis consistently cited as saying that every producing causefirstbrings about effects that are like it andtheneffects that are unlike it. This is a theorem to which Proclus is indeed committed, but I argue that it is not what Proclus is claiming here. At this stage of his general argument, he merely argues that every cause produces things that are like it, without saying anything about other products than the immediate ones. The standard interpretation of proposition 28 is therefore wrong. This becomes clear if one pays close attention to the argumentative structure of theElements of Theologyand to the proof given for proposition 28.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-03

Downloads
70 (#845,963)

6 months
6 (#1,539,328)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Proclus and Self-Predication.Pieter D’Hoine - 2019 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2):461-470.
A Wholesome Trinity.Arthur Oosthout - 2022 - Ancient Philosophy 42 (2):515-536.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Proclus: Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science.Lucas Siorvanes - 1997 - Edinburgh: Yale University Press.

Add more references